Cargando…

Improving the design of studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis on health outcomes: a qualitative study of perspectives of diverse stakeholders

Background: Studies evaluating the impact of Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis (TB) have demonstrated varied effects on health outcomes with many studies showing inconclusive results. We explored perceptions among diverse stakeholders about studies evaluating the impact of TB diagnostic tests,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ochodo, Eleanor A., Naidoo, Selvan, Schumacher, Samuel, Steingart, Karen, Deeks, Jon, Cobelens, Frank, Bossuyt, Patrick M., Young, Taryn, Nicol, Mark P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32133421
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15551.1
_version_ 1783501144930123776
author Ochodo, Eleanor A.
Naidoo, Selvan
Schumacher, Samuel
Steingart, Karen
Deeks, Jon
Cobelens, Frank
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Young, Taryn
Nicol, Mark P.
author_facet Ochodo, Eleanor A.
Naidoo, Selvan
Schumacher, Samuel
Steingart, Karen
Deeks, Jon
Cobelens, Frank
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Young, Taryn
Nicol, Mark P.
author_sort Ochodo, Eleanor A.
collection PubMed
description Background: Studies evaluating the impact of Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis (TB) have demonstrated varied effects on health outcomes with many studies showing inconclusive results. We explored perceptions among diverse stakeholders about studies evaluating the impact of TB diagnostic tests, and identified suggestions for improving these studies. Methods: We used purposive sampling with consideration for differing expertise and geographical balance and conducted in depth semi-structured interviews. We interviewed English-speaking participants, including TB patients, and others involved in research, care or decision-making about TB diagnostics. We used the thematic approach to code and analyse the interview transcripts. Results: We interviewed 31 participants. Our study showed that stakeholders had different expectations with regard to test impact and how it is measured. TB test impact studies were perceived to be important for supporting implementation of tests but there were concerns about the unrealistic expectations placed on tests to improve outcomes in health systems with many influencing factors. To improve TB test impact studies, respondents suggested conducting health system assessments prior to the study; developing clear guidance on the study methodology and interpretation; improving study design by describing questions and interventions that consider the influences of the health-care ecosystem on the diagnostic test; selecting the target population at the health-care level most likely to benefit from the test; setting realistic targets for effect sizes in the sample size calculations; and interpreting study results carefully and avoiding categorisation and interpretation of results based on statistical significance alone. Researchers should involve multiple stakeholders in the design of studies. Advocating for more funding to support robust studies is essential. Conclusion: TB test impact studies were perceived to be important to support implementation of tests but there were concerns about their complexity. Process evaluations of their health system context and guidance for their design and interpretation are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7041361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70413612020-03-03 Improving the design of studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis on health outcomes: a qualitative study of perspectives of diverse stakeholders Ochodo, Eleanor A. Naidoo, Selvan Schumacher, Samuel Steingart, Karen Deeks, Jon Cobelens, Frank Bossuyt, Patrick M. Young, Taryn Nicol, Mark P. Wellcome Open Res Research Article Background: Studies evaluating the impact of Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis (TB) have demonstrated varied effects on health outcomes with many studies showing inconclusive results. We explored perceptions among diverse stakeholders about studies evaluating the impact of TB diagnostic tests, and identified suggestions for improving these studies. Methods: We used purposive sampling with consideration for differing expertise and geographical balance and conducted in depth semi-structured interviews. We interviewed English-speaking participants, including TB patients, and others involved in research, care or decision-making about TB diagnostics. We used the thematic approach to code and analyse the interview transcripts. Results: We interviewed 31 participants. Our study showed that stakeholders had different expectations with regard to test impact and how it is measured. TB test impact studies were perceived to be important for supporting implementation of tests but there were concerns about the unrealistic expectations placed on tests to improve outcomes in health systems with many influencing factors. To improve TB test impact studies, respondents suggested conducting health system assessments prior to the study; developing clear guidance on the study methodology and interpretation; improving study design by describing questions and interventions that consider the influences of the health-care ecosystem on the diagnostic test; selecting the target population at the health-care level most likely to benefit from the test; setting realistic targets for effect sizes in the sample size calculations; and interpreting study results carefully and avoiding categorisation and interpretation of results based on statistical significance alone. Researchers should involve multiple stakeholders in the design of studies. Advocating for more funding to support robust studies is essential. Conclusion: TB test impact studies were perceived to be important to support implementation of tests but there were concerns about their complexity. Process evaluations of their health system context and guidance for their design and interpretation are recommended. F1000 Research Limited 2019-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7041361/ /pubmed/32133421 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15551.1 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Ochodo EA et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ochodo, Eleanor A.
Naidoo, Selvan
Schumacher, Samuel
Steingart, Karen
Deeks, Jon
Cobelens, Frank
Bossuyt, Patrick M.
Young, Taryn
Nicol, Mark P.
Improving the design of studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis on health outcomes: a qualitative study of perspectives of diverse stakeholders
title Improving the design of studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis on health outcomes: a qualitative study of perspectives of diverse stakeholders
title_full Improving the design of studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis on health outcomes: a qualitative study of perspectives of diverse stakeholders
title_fullStr Improving the design of studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis on health outcomes: a qualitative study of perspectives of diverse stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed Improving the design of studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis on health outcomes: a qualitative study of perspectives of diverse stakeholders
title_short Improving the design of studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis on health outcomes: a qualitative study of perspectives of diverse stakeholders
title_sort improving the design of studies evaluating the impact of diagnostic tests for tuberculosis on health outcomes: a qualitative study of perspectives of diverse stakeholders
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32133421
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15551.1
work_keys_str_mv AT ochodoeleanora improvingthedesignofstudiesevaluatingtheimpactofdiagnostictestsfortuberculosisonhealthoutcomesaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofdiversestakeholders
AT naidooselvan improvingthedesignofstudiesevaluatingtheimpactofdiagnostictestsfortuberculosisonhealthoutcomesaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofdiversestakeholders
AT schumachersamuel improvingthedesignofstudiesevaluatingtheimpactofdiagnostictestsfortuberculosisonhealthoutcomesaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofdiversestakeholders
AT steingartkaren improvingthedesignofstudiesevaluatingtheimpactofdiagnostictestsfortuberculosisonhealthoutcomesaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofdiversestakeholders
AT deeksjon improvingthedesignofstudiesevaluatingtheimpactofdiagnostictestsfortuberculosisonhealthoutcomesaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofdiversestakeholders
AT cobelensfrank improvingthedesignofstudiesevaluatingtheimpactofdiagnostictestsfortuberculosisonhealthoutcomesaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofdiversestakeholders
AT bossuytpatrickm improvingthedesignofstudiesevaluatingtheimpactofdiagnostictestsfortuberculosisonhealthoutcomesaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofdiversestakeholders
AT youngtaryn improvingthedesignofstudiesevaluatingtheimpactofdiagnostictestsfortuberculosisonhealthoutcomesaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofdiversestakeholders
AT nicolmarkp improvingthedesignofstudiesevaluatingtheimpactofdiagnostictestsfortuberculosisonhealthoutcomesaqualitativestudyofperspectivesofdiversestakeholders