Cargando…

Low-pass genome sequencing versus chromosomal microarray analysis: implementation in prenatal diagnosis

PURPOSE: Emerging studies suggest that low-pass genome sequencing (GS) provides additional diagnostic yield of clinically significant copy-number variants (CNVs) compared with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). However, a prospective back-to-back comparison evaluating accuracy, efficacy, and inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Huilin, Dong, Zirui, Zhang, Rui, Chau, Matthew Hoi Kin, Yang, Zhenjun, Tsang, Kathy Yin Ching, Wong, Hoi Kin, Gui, Baoheng, Meng, Zhuo, Xiao, Kelin, Zhu, Xiaofan, Wang, Yanfang, Chen, Shaoyun, Leung, Tak Yeung, Cheung, Sau Wai, Kwok, Yvonne K., Morton, Cynthia C., Zhu, Yuanfang, Choy, Kwong Wai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447483
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0634-7
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Emerging studies suggest that low-pass genome sequencing (GS) provides additional diagnostic yield of clinically significant copy-number variants (CNVs) compared with chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). However, a prospective back-to-back comparison evaluating accuracy, efficacy, and incremental yield of low-pass GS compared with CMA is warranted. METHODS: A total of 1,023 women undergoing prenatal diagnosis were enrolled. Each sample was subjected to low-pass GS and CMA for CNV analysis in parallel. CNVs were classified according to guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. RESULTS: Low-pass GS not only identified all 124 numerical disorders or pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) CNVs detected by CMA in 121 cases (11.8%, 121/1,023), but also defined 17 additional and clinically relevant P/LP CNVs in 17 cases (1.7%, 17/1,023). In addition, low-pass GS significantly reduced the technical repeat rate from 4.6% (47/1,023) for CMA to 0.5% (5/1,023) and required less DNA (50 ng) as input. CONCLUSION: In the context of prenatal diagnosis, low-pass GS identified additional and clinically significant information with enhanced resolution and increased sensitivity of detecting mosaicism as compared with the CMA platform used. This study provides strong evidence for applying low-pass GS as an alternative prenatal diagnostic test.