Cargando…

Low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support (CDS) improves nutrition delivery for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), however, the prevalence of CDS to support nutrition is unknown. METHODS: Online surveys, with telephone and email validation of responses, were administered to NICU clinici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falciglia, Gustave H., Murthy, Karna, Holl, Jane L., Palac, Hannah L., Woods, Donna M., Robinson, Daniel T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31813935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0546-z
_version_ 1783501251946741760
author Falciglia, Gustave H.
Murthy, Karna
Holl, Jane L.
Palac, Hannah L.
Woods, Donna M.
Robinson, Daniel T.
author_facet Falciglia, Gustave H.
Murthy, Karna
Holl, Jane L.
Palac, Hannah L.
Woods, Donna M.
Robinson, Daniel T.
author_sort Falciglia, Gustave H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support (CDS) improves nutrition delivery for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), however, the prevalence of CDS to support nutrition is unknown. METHODS: Online surveys, with telephone and email validation of responses, were administered to NICU clinicians in the Children’s Hospital Neonatal Consortium (CHNC). We determined and compared the availability of CDS to calculate calories and fluid received in the prior 24 h, stratified by enteral and parenteral intake, using McNemar’s test. RESULTS: Clinicians at all 34 CHNC hospitals responded with 98 of 108 (91%) surveys completed. NICUs have considerably less CDS to calculate enteral calories received than enteral fluid received (32% vs. 82%, p < 0.001) and less CDS to calculate parenteral calories received than parenteral fluid received (29% vs. 82%, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Most CHNC NICUs are unable to reliably and consistently monitor caloric intake delivered to critically ill infants at risk for growth failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7042157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70421572020-03-04 Low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit Falciglia, Gustave H. Murthy, Karna Holl, Jane L. Palac, Hannah L. Woods, Donna M. Robinson, Daniel T. J Perinatol Article BACKGROUND: Clinical decision support (CDS) improves nutrition delivery for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), however, the prevalence of CDS to support nutrition is unknown. METHODS: Online surveys, with telephone and email validation of responses, were administered to NICU clinicians in the Children’s Hospital Neonatal Consortium (CHNC). We determined and compared the availability of CDS to calculate calories and fluid received in the prior 24 h, stratified by enteral and parenteral intake, using McNemar’s test. RESULTS: Clinicians at all 34 CHNC hospitals responded with 98 of 108 (91%) surveys completed. NICUs have considerably less CDS to calculate enteral calories received than enteral fluid received (32% vs. 82%, p < 0.001) and less CDS to calculate parenteral calories received than parenteral fluid received (29% vs. 82%, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Most CHNC NICUs are unable to reliably and consistently monitor caloric intake delivered to critically ill infants at risk for growth failure. Nature Publishing Group US 2019-12-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7042157/ /pubmed/31813935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0546-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Falciglia, Gustave H.
Murthy, Karna
Holl, Jane L.
Palac, Hannah L.
Woods, Donna M.
Robinson, Daniel T.
Low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
title Low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
title_full Low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
title_fullStr Low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
title_short Low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
title_sort low prevalence of clinical decision support to calculate caloric and fluid intake for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31813935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0546-z
work_keys_str_mv AT falcigliagustaveh lowprevalenceofclinicaldecisionsupporttocalculatecaloricandfluidintakeforinfantsintheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT murthykarna lowprevalenceofclinicaldecisionsupporttocalculatecaloricandfluidintakeforinfantsintheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT holljanel lowprevalenceofclinicaldecisionsupporttocalculatecaloricandfluidintakeforinfantsintheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT palachannahl lowprevalenceofclinicaldecisionsupporttocalculatecaloricandfluidintakeforinfantsintheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT woodsdonnam lowprevalenceofclinicaldecisionsupporttocalculatecaloricandfluidintakeforinfantsintheneonatalintensivecareunit
AT robinsondanielt lowprevalenceofclinicaldecisionsupporttocalculatecaloricandfluidintakeforinfantsintheneonatalintensivecareunit