Cargando…
The impact of acute remote ischaemic preconditioning on cerebrovascular function
PURPOSE: Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) refers to the protection conferred to tissues and organs via brief periods of ischaemia in a remote vascular territory, including the brain. Recent studies in humans report that RIPC provides neuroprotection against recurrent (ischaemic) stroke. To be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31932877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04297-1 |
_version_ | 1783501259457691648 |
---|---|
author | Carter, Howard H. Maxwell, Joseph D. Hellsten, Ylva Thompson, Andrew Thijssen, Dick H. J. Jones, Helen |
author_facet | Carter, Howard H. Maxwell, Joseph D. Hellsten, Ylva Thompson, Andrew Thijssen, Dick H. J. Jones, Helen |
author_sort | Carter, Howard H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) refers to the protection conferred to tissues and organs via brief periods of ischaemia in a remote vascular territory, including the brain. Recent studies in humans report that RIPC provides neuroprotection against recurrent (ischaemic) stroke. To better understand the ability of RIPC to improve brain health, the present study explored the potential for RIPC to acutely improve cerebrovascular function. METHODS: Eleven young healthy (females n = 6, age; 28.1 ± 3.7 years) and 9 older individuals (females n = 4, age 52.5 ± 6.7 years) at increased risk for stroke (cardiovascular disease risk factors) underwent assessments of cerebrovascular function, assessed by carbon dioxide (CO(2)) reactivity and cerebral autoregulation during normo- and hypercapnia (5% CO(2)) following 40 mins of bilateral arm RIPC or a sham condition. Squat-to-stand manoeuvres were performed to induce changes in blood pressure to assess cerebral autoregulation (0.10 Hz) and analysed via transfer function. RESULTS: We found no change in middle cerebral artery velocity or blood pressure across 40 mins of RIPC. Application of RIPC resulted in no change in CO(2) reactivity slopes (sham vs RIPC, 1.97 ± 0.88 vs 2.06 ± 0.69 cm/s/mmHg P = 0.61) or parameters of cerebral autoregulation during normocapnia (sham vs RIPC, normalised gain%, 1.27 ± 0.25 vs 1.22 ± 0.35, P = 0.46). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a single bout of RIPC does not influence cerebrovascular function acutely in healthy individuals, or those at increased cardiovascular risk. Given the previously reported protective role of RIPC on stroke recurrence in humans, it is possible that repeated bouts of RIPC may be necessary to impart beneficial effects on cerebrovascular function. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7042189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70421892020-03-10 The impact of acute remote ischaemic preconditioning on cerebrovascular function Carter, Howard H. Maxwell, Joseph D. Hellsten, Ylva Thompson, Andrew Thijssen, Dick H. J. Jones, Helen Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article PURPOSE: Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) refers to the protection conferred to tissues and organs via brief periods of ischaemia in a remote vascular territory, including the brain. Recent studies in humans report that RIPC provides neuroprotection against recurrent (ischaemic) stroke. To better understand the ability of RIPC to improve brain health, the present study explored the potential for RIPC to acutely improve cerebrovascular function. METHODS: Eleven young healthy (females n = 6, age; 28.1 ± 3.7 years) and 9 older individuals (females n = 4, age 52.5 ± 6.7 years) at increased risk for stroke (cardiovascular disease risk factors) underwent assessments of cerebrovascular function, assessed by carbon dioxide (CO(2)) reactivity and cerebral autoregulation during normo- and hypercapnia (5% CO(2)) following 40 mins of bilateral arm RIPC or a sham condition. Squat-to-stand manoeuvres were performed to induce changes in blood pressure to assess cerebral autoregulation (0.10 Hz) and analysed via transfer function. RESULTS: We found no change in middle cerebral artery velocity or blood pressure across 40 mins of RIPC. Application of RIPC resulted in no change in CO(2) reactivity slopes (sham vs RIPC, 1.97 ± 0.88 vs 2.06 ± 0.69 cm/s/mmHg P = 0.61) or parameters of cerebral autoregulation during normocapnia (sham vs RIPC, normalised gain%, 1.27 ± 0.25 vs 1.22 ± 0.35, P = 0.46). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a single bout of RIPC does not influence cerebrovascular function acutely in healthy individuals, or those at increased cardiovascular risk. Given the previously reported protective role of RIPC on stroke recurrence in humans, it is possible that repeated bouts of RIPC may be necessary to impart beneficial effects on cerebrovascular function. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-01-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7042189/ /pubmed/31932877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04297-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Carter, Howard H. Maxwell, Joseph D. Hellsten, Ylva Thompson, Andrew Thijssen, Dick H. J. Jones, Helen The impact of acute remote ischaemic preconditioning on cerebrovascular function |
title | The impact of acute remote ischaemic preconditioning on cerebrovascular function |
title_full | The impact of acute remote ischaemic preconditioning on cerebrovascular function |
title_fullStr | The impact of acute remote ischaemic preconditioning on cerebrovascular function |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of acute remote ischaemic preconditioning on cerebrovascular function |
title_short | The impact of acute remote ischaemic preconditioning on cerebrovascular function |
title_sort | impact of acute remote ischaemic preconditioning on cerebrovascular function |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31932877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04297-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carterhowardh theimpactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction AT maxwelljosephd theimpactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction AT hellstenylva theimpactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction AT thompsonandrew theimpactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction AT thijssendickhj theimpactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction AT joneshelen theimpactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction AT carterhowardh impactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction AT maxwelljosephd impactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction AT hellstenylva impactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction AT thompsonandrew impactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction AT thijssendickhj impactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction AT joneshelen impactofacuteremoteischaemicpreconditioningoncerebrovascularfunction |