Cargando…
Latent Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Susceptible to Adjuvant Treatment After Resection: A Clinical Deep Learning Approach
Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) frameworks have emerged as a novel approach in medicine. However, information regarding its applicability and effectiveness in a clinical prognostic factor setting remains unclear. Methods: The AI framework was derived from a pooled dataset of intrahepatic ch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00143 |
_version_ | 1783501296706256896 |
---|---|
author | Jeong, Seogsong Ge, Yang Chen, Jing Gao, Qiang Luo, Guijuan Zheng, Bo Sha, Meng Shen, Feng Cheng, Qingbao Sui, Chengjun Liu, Jingfeng Wang, Hongyang Xia, Qiang Chen, Lei |
author_facet | Jeong, Seogsong Ge, Yang Chen, Jing Gao, Qiang Luo, Guijuan Zheng, Bo Sha, Meng Shen, Feng Cheng, Qingbao Sui, Chengjun Liu, Jingfeng Wang, Hongyang Xia, Qiang Chen, Lei |
author_sort | Jeong, Seogsong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) frameworks have emerged as a novel approach in medicine. However, information regarding its applicability and effectiveness in a clinical prognostic factor setting remains unclear. Methods: The AI framework was derived from a pooled dataset of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients from three clinical centers (n = 1,421) by applying the TensorFlow deep learning algorithm to Cox-indicated pathologic (four), serologic (six), and etiologic (two) factors; this algorithm was validated using a dataset of ICC patients from an independent clinical center (n = 234). The model was compared to the commonly used staging system (American Joint Committee on Cancer; AJCC) and methodology (Cox regression) by evaluating the brier score (BS), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and area under curve (AUC) values. Results: The framework (BS, 0.17; AUC, 0.78) was found to be more accurate than the AJCC stage (BS, 0.48; AUC, 0.60; IDI, 0.29; NRI, 11.85; P < 0.001) and the Cox model (BS, 0.49; AUC, 0.70; IDI, 0.46; NRI, 46.11; P < 0.001). Furthermore, hazard ratios greater than three were identified in both overall survival (HR; 3.190; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.150–4.733; P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (HR, 3.559; 95% CI, 2.500–5.067; P < 0.001) between latent risk and stable groups in validation. In addition, the latent risk subgroup was found to be significantly benefited from adjuvant treatment (HR, 0.459; 95% CI, 0.360–0.586; P < 0.001). Conclusions: The AI framework seems promising in the prognostic estimation and stratification of susceptible individuals for adjuvant treatment in patients with ICC after resection. Future prospective validations are needed for the framework to be applied in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7042372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70423722020-03-05 Latent Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Susceptible to Adjuvant Treatment After Resection: A Clinical Deep Learning Approach Jeong, Seogsong Ge, Yang Chen, Jing Gao, Qiang Luo, Guijuan Zheng, Bo Sha, Meng Shen, Feng Cheng, Qingbao Sui, Chengjun Liu, Jingfeng Wang, Hongyang Xia, Qiang Chen, Lei Front Oncol Oncology Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) frameworks have emerged as a novel approach in medicine. However, information regarding its applicability and effectiveness in a clinical prognostic factor setting remains unclear. Methods: The AI framework was derived from a pooled dataset of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients from three clinical centers (n = 1,421) by applying the TensorFlow deep learning algorithm to Cox-indicated pathologic (four), serologic (six), and etiologic (two) factors; this algorithm was validated using a dataset of ICC patients from an independent clinical center (n = 234). The model was compared to the commonly used staging system (American Joint Committee on Cancer; AJCC) and methodology (Cox regression) by evaluating the brier score (BS), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and area under curve (AUC) values. Results: The framework (BS, 0.17; AUC, 0.78) was found to be more accurate than the AJCC stage (BS, 0.48; AUC, 0.60; IDI, 0.29; NRI, 11.85; P < 0.001) and the Cox model (BS, 0.49; AUC, 0.70; IDI, 0.46; NRI, 46.11; P < 0.001). Furthermore, hazard ratios greater than three were identified in both overall survival (HR; 3.190; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.150–4.733; P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (HR, 3.559; 95% CI, 2.500–5.067; P < 0.001) between latent risk and stable groups in validation. In addition, the latent risk subgroup was found to be significantly benefited from adjuvant treatment (HR, 0.459; 95% CI, 0.360–0.586; P < 0.001). Conclusions: The AI framework seems promising in the prognostic estimation and stratification of susceptible individuals for adjuvant treatment in patients with ICC after resection. Future prospective validations are needed for the framework to be applied in clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7042372/ /pubmed/32140448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00143 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jeong, Ge, Chen, Gao, Luo, Zheng, Sha, Shen, Cheng, Sui, Liu, Wang, Xia and Chen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Jeong, Seogsong Ge, Yang Chen, Jing Gao, Qiang Luo, Guijuan Zheng, Bo Sha, Meng Shen, Feng Cheng, Qingbao Sui, Chengjun Liu, Jingfeng Wang, Hongyang Xia, Qiang Chen, Lei Latent Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Susceptible to Adjuvant Treatment After Resection: A Clinical Deep Learning Approach |
title | Latent Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Susceptible to Adjuvant Treatment After Resection: A Clinical Deep Learning Approach |
title_full | Latent Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Susceptible to Adjuvant Treatment After Resection: A Clinical Deep Learning Approach |
title_fullStr | Latent Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Susceptible to Adjuvant Treatment After Resection: A Clinical Deep Learning Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Latent Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Susceptible to Adjuvant Treatment After Resection: A Clinical Deep Learning Approach |
title_short | Latent Risk Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Susceptible to Adjuvant Treatment After Resection: A Clinical Deep Learning Approach |
title_sort | latent risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma susceptible to adjuvant treatment after resection: a clinical deep learning approach |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeongseogsong latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT geyang latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT chenjing latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT gaoqiang latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT luoguijuan latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT zhengbo latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT shameng latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT shenfeng latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT chengqingbao latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT suichengjun latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT liujingfeng latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT wanghongyang latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT xiaqiang latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach AT chenlei latentriskintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomasusceptibletoadjuvanttreatmentafterresectionaclinicaldeeplearningapproach |