Cargando…

Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study

There are various scanners available in dental practice with various accuracies. The aim of this study was to compare the 3D capturing accuracy of scans obtained from Trios 3 and Dental Wings scanner. A reference mandibular model was printed from FormLab with reference points in three axes (X, Y, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amornvit, Pokpong, Sanohkan, Sasiwimol, Peampring, Chaimongkon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5739312
_version_ 1783501322299899904
author Amornvit, Pokpong
Sanohkan, Sasiwimol
Peampring, Chaimongkon
author_facet Amornvit, Pokpong
Sanohkan, Sasiwimol
Peampring, Chaimongkon
author_sort Amornvit, Pokpong
collection PubMed
description There are various scanners available in dental practice with various accuracies. The aim of this study was to compare the 3D capturing accuracy of scans obtained from Trios 3 and Dental Wings scanner. A reference mandibular model was printed from FormLab with reference points in three axes (X, Y, and XY and Z). The printed model was scanned 5 times with 3 scans: normal scan by Trios 3 (Trios 3A), high-resolution scan by Trios 3 (Trios 3B), and normal scan by Dental Wings. After scan, the stereolithography (stl) files were generated. Then, the measurements were made from the computer software using Rhinoceros 3D (Rhino, Robert McNeel & Associates for Windows, Washington DC, USA). The measurements made with digital caliper were taken as control. Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA with post hoc using Sheffe (P < 0.01). Trios 3 presented higher accuracy than Dental Wings and high resolution showed better results. The Dental Wings showed less accuracy at the measurements >50 mm of length and >30 mm in width. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) of control with the Trios 3A and Trios 3B. Similarly, for the measurements in Z-axis, there was no significant difference of control with each scan (Trios 3A, Trios 3B, and Dental Wings). Accuracy of the scan is affected by the length of the scanning area and scanning pattern. It is less recommended to Dental Wings scan >3-unit prosthesis and that crosses the midline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7042536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70425362020-03-07 Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study Amornvit, Pokpong Sanohkan, Sasiwimol Peampring, Chaimongkon J Healthc Eng Research Article There are various scanners available in dental practice with various accuracies. The aim of this study was to compare the 3D capturing accuracy of scans obtained from Trios 3 and Dental Wings scanner. A reference mandibular model was printed from FormLab with reference points in three axes (X, Y, and XY and Z). The printed model was scanned 5 times with 3 scans: normal scan by Trios 3 (Trios 3A), high-resolution scan by Trios 3 (Trios 3B), and normal scan by Dental Wings. After scan, the stereolithography (stl) files were generated. Then, the measurements were made from the computer software using Rhinoceros 3D (Rhino, Robert McNeel & Associates for Windows, Washington DC, USA). The measurements made with digital caliper were taken as control. Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA with post hoc using Sheffe (P < 0.01). Trios 3 presented higher accuracy than Dental Wings and high resolution showed better results. The Dental Wings showed less accuracy at the measurements >50 mm of length and >30 mm in width. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) of control with the Trios 3A and Trios 3B. Similarly, for the measurements in Z-axis, there was no significant difference of control with each scan (Trios 3A, Trios 3B, and Dental Wings). Accuracy of the scan is affected by the length of the scanning area and scanning pattern. It is less recommended to Dental Wings scan >3-unit prosthesis and that crosses the midline. Hindawi 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7042536/ /pubmed/32148745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5739312 Text en Copyright © 2020 Pokpong Amornvit et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Amornvit, Pokpong
Sanohkan, Sasiwimol
Peampring, Chaimongkon
Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study
title Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study
title_full Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study
title_short Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study
title_sort studying the optical 3d accuracy of intraoral scans: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5739312
work_keys_str_mv AT amornvitpokpong studyingtheoptical3daccuracyofintraoralscansaninvitrostudy
AT sanohkansasiwimol studyingtheoptical3daccuracyofintraoralscansaninvitrostudy
AT peampringchaimongkon studyingtheoptical3daccuracyofintraoralscansaninvitrostudy