Cargando…

Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE: There are many barriers to accessing mental health assessments including cost and stigma. Even when individuals receive professional care, assessments are intermittent and may be limited partly due to the episodic nature of psychiatric symptoms. Therefore, machine‐learning technology usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Low, Daniel M., Bentley, Kate H., Ghosh, Satrajit S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.354
_version_ 1783501350222430208
author Low, Daniel M.
Bentley, Kate H.
Ghosh, Satrajit S.
author_facet Low, Daniel M.
Bentley, Kate H.
Ghosh, Satrajit S.
author_sort Low, Daniel M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: There are many barriers to accessing mental health assessments including cost and stigma. Even when individuals receive professional care, assessments are intermittent and may be limited partly due to the episodic nature of psychiatric symptoms. Therefore, machine‐learning technology using speech samples obtained in the clinic or remotely could one day be a biomarker to improve diagnosis and treatment. To date, reviews have only focused on using acoustic features from speech to detect depression and schizophrenia. Here, we present the first systematic review of studies using speech for automated assessments across a broader range of psychiatric disorders. METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We included studies from the last 10 years using speech to identify the presence or severity of disorders within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐5). For each study, we describe sample size, clinical evaluation method, speech‐eliciting tasks, machine learning methodology, performance, and other relevant findings. RESULTS: 1395 studies were screened of which 127 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were on depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder, and the remaining on post‐traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, and eating disorders. 63% of studies built machine learning predictive models, and the remaining 37% performed null‐hypothesis testing only. We provide an online database with our search results and synthesize how acoustic features appear in each disorder. CONCLUSION: Speech processing technology could aid mental health assessments, but there are many obstacles to overcome, especially the need for comprehensive transdiagnostic and longitudinal studies. Given the diverse types of data sets, feature extraction, computational methodologies, and evaluation criteria, we provide guidelines for both acquiring data and building machine learning models with a focus on testing hypotheses, open science, reproducibility, and generalizability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3a
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7042657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70426572020-03-03 Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review Low, Daniel M. Bentley, Kate H. Ghosh, Satrajit S. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Laryngology, Speech and Language Science OBJECTIVE: There are many barriers to accessing mental health assessments including cost and stigma. Even when individuals receive professional care, assessments are intermittent and may be limited partly due to the episodic nature of psychiatric symptoms. Therefore, machine‐learning technology using speech samples obtained in the clinic or remotely could one day be a biomarker to improve diagnosis and treatment. To date, reviews have only focused on using acoustic features from speech to detect depression and schizophrenia. Here, we present the first systematic review of studies using speech for automated assessments across a broader range of psychiatric disorders. METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We included studies from the last 10 years using speech to identify the presence or severity of disorders within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐5). For each study, we describe sample size, clinical evaluation method, speech‐eliciting tasks, machine learning methodology, performance, and other relevant findings. RESULTS: 1395 studies were screened of which 127 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were on depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder, and the remaining on post‐traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, and eating disorders. 63% of studies built machine learning predictive models, and the remaining 37% performed null‐hypothesis testing only. We provide an online database with our search results and synthesize how acoustic features appear in each disorder. CONCLUSION: Speech processing technology could aid mental health assessments, but there are many obstacles to overcome, especially the need for comprehensive transdiagnostic and longitudinal studies. Given the diverse types of data sets, feature extraction, computational methodologies, and evaluation criteria, we provide guidelines for both acquiring data and building machine learning models with a focus on testing hypotheses, open science, reproducibility, and generalizability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3a John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7042657/ /pubmed/32128436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.354 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Laryngology, Speech and Language Science
Low, Daniel M.
Bentley, Kate H.
Ghosh, Satrajit S.
Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review
title Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review
title_full Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review
title_fullStr Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review
title_short Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review
title_sort automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: a systematic review
topic Laryngology, Speech and Language Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.354
work_keys_str_mv AT lowdanielm automatedassessmentofpsychiatricdisordersusingspeechasystematicreview
AT bentleykateh automatedassessmentofpsychiatricdisordersusingspeechasystematicreview
AT ghoshsatrajits automatedassessmentofpsychiatricdisordersusingspeechasystematicreview