Cargando…
Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access
The introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in healthcare systems around the world offers an opportunity to reconsider funding policies for prenatal screening. In some countries with universal access healthcare systems, pregnant women and their partners are asked to (co)pay for NIPT. In...
Autores principales: | Bunnik, Eline M, Kater-Kuipers, Adriana, Galjaard, Robert-Jan H, de Beaufort, Inez D |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7042959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31527142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105675 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Why NIPT should be publicly funded
por: Bunnik, Eline Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Rethinking counselling in prenatal screening: An ethical analysis of informed consent in the context of non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)
por: Kater‐Kuipers, Adriana, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals
por: Kater-Kuipers, A., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Implementing non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Netherlands: An interview study exploring opinions about and experiences with societal pressure, reimbursement, and an expanding scope
por: Bakkeren, Iris M., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Routinization of prenatal screening with the non-invasive prenatal test: pregnant women’s perspectives
por: van der Meij, Karuna R. M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)