Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment

As the basis for managing the risks of chemical exposure, the Chemical Risk Assessment (CRA) process can impact a substantial part of the economy, the health of hundreds of millions of people, and the condition of the environment. However, the number of properly assessed chemicals falls short of soc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wittwehr, Clemens, Blomstedt, Paul, Gosling, John Paul, Peltola, Tomi, Raffael, Barbara, Richarz, Andrea-Nicole, Sienkiewicz, Marta, Whaley, Paul, Worth, Andrew, Whelan, Maurice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7043333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2019.100114
_version_ 1783501426793644032
author Wittwehr, Clemens
Blomstedt, Paul
Gosling, John Paul
Peltola, Tomi
Raffael, Barbara
Richarz, Andrea-Nicole
Sienkiewicz, Marta
Whaley, Paul
Worth, Andrew
Whelan, Maurice
author_facet Wittwehr, Clemens
Blomstedt, Paul
Gosling, John Paul
Peltola, Tomi
Raffael, Barbara
Richarz, Andrea-Nicole
Sienkiewicz, Marta
Whaley, Paul
Worth, Andrew
Whelan, Maurice
author_sort Wittwehr, Clemens
collection PubMed
description As the basis for managing the risks of chemical exposure, the Chemical Risk Assessment (CRA) process can impact a substantial part of the economy, the health of hundreds of millions of people, and the condition of the environment. However, the number of properly assessed chemicals falls short of societal needs due to a lack of experts for evaluation, interference of third party interests, and the sheer volume of potentially relevant information on the chemicals from disparate sources. In order to explore ways in which computational methods may help overcome this discrepancy between the number of chemical risk assessments required on the one hand and the number and adequateness of assessments actually being conducted on the other, the European Commission's Joint Research Centre organised a workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Chemical Risk Assessment (AI4CRA). The workshop identified a number of areas where Artificial Intelligence could potentially increase the number and quality of regulatory risk management decisions based on CRA, involving process simulation, supporting evaluation, identifying problems, facilitating collaboration, finding experts, evidence gathering, systematic review, knowledge discovery, and building cognitive models. Although these are interconnected, they are organised and discussed under two main themes: scientific-technical process and social aspects and the decision making process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7043333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier B.V
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70433332020-03-03 Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment Wittwehr, Clemens Blomstedt, Paul Gosling, John Paul Peltola, Tomi Raffael, Barbara Richarz, Andrea-Nicole Sienkiewicz, Marta Whaley, Paul Worth, Andrew Whelan, Maurice Comput Toxicol Article As the basis for managing the risks of chemical exposure, the Chemical Risk Assessment (CRA) process can impact a substantial part of the economy, the health of hundreds of millions of people, and the condition of the environment. However, the number of properly assessed chemicals falls short of societal needs due to a lack of experts for evaluation, interference of third party interests, and the sheer volume of potentially relevant information on the chemicals from disparate sources. In order to explore ways in which computational methods may help overcome this discrepancy between the number of chemical risk assessments required on the one hand and the number and adequateness of assessments actually being conducted on the other, the European Commission's Joint Research Centre organised a workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Chemical Risk Assessment (AI4CRA). The workshop identified a number of areas where Artificial Intelligence could potentially increase the number and quality of regulatory risk management decisions based on CRA, involving process simulation, supporting evaluation, identifying problems, facilitating collaboration, finding experts, evidence gathering, systematic review, knowledge discovery, and building cognitive models. Although these are interconnected, they are organised and discussed under two main themes: scientific-technical process and social aspects and the decision making process. Elsevier B.V 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7043333/ /pubmed/32140631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2019.100114 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wittwehr, Clemens
Blomstedt, Paul
Gosling, John Paul
Peltola, Tomi
Raffael, Barbara
Richarz, Andrea-Nicole
Sienkiewicz, Marta
Whaley, Paul
Worth, Andrew
Whelan, Maurice
Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment
title Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment
title_full Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment
title_short Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment
title_sort artificial intelligence for chemical risk assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7043333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2019.100114
work_keys_str_mv AT wittwehrclemens artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment
AT blomstedtpaul artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment
AT goslingjohnpaul artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment
AT peltolatomi artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment
AT raffaelbarbara artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment
AT richarzandreanicole artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment
AT sienkiewiczmarta artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment
AT whaleypaul artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment
AT worthandrew artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment
AT whelanmaurice artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment