Cargando…
Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment
As the basis for managing the risks of chemical exposure, the Chemical Risk Assessment (CRA) process can impact a substantial part of the economy, the health of hundreds of millions of people, and the condition of the environment. However, the number of properly assessed chemicals falls short of soc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7043333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2019.100114 |
_version_ | 1783501426793644032 |
---|---|
author | Wittwehr, Clemens Blomstedt, Paul Gosling, John Paul Peltola, Tomi Raffael, Barbara Richarz, Andrea-Nicole Sienkiewicz, Marta Whaley, Paul Worth, Andrew Whelan, Maurice |
author_facet | Wittwehr, Clemens Blomstedt, Paul Gosling, John Paul Peltola, Tomi Raffael, Barbara Richarz, Andrea-Nicole Sienkiewicz, Marta Whaley, Paul Worth, Andrew Whelan, Maurice |
author_sort | Wittwehr, Clemens |
collection | PubMed |
description | As the basis for managing the risks of chemical exposure, the Chemical Risk Assessment (CRA) process can impact a substantial part of the economy, the health of hundreds of millions of people, and the condition of the environment. However, the number of properly assessed chemicals falls short of societal needs due to a lack of experts for evaluation, interference of third party interests, and the sheer volume of potentially relevant information on the chemicals from disparate sources. In order to explore ways in which computational methods may help overcome this discrepancy between the number of chemical risk assessments required on the one hand and the number and adequateness of assessments actually being conducted on the other, the European Commission's Joint Research Centre organised a workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Chemical Risk Assessment (AI4CRA). The workshop identified a number of areas where Artificial Intelligence could potentially increase the number and quality of regulatory risk management decisions based on CRA, involving process simulation, supporting evaluation, identifying problems, facilitating collaboration, finding experts, evidence gathering, systematic review, knowledge discovery, and building cognitive models. Although these are interconnected, they are organised and discussed under two main themes: scientific-technical process and social aspects and the decision making process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7043333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70433332020-03-03 Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment Wittwehr, Clemens Blomstedt, Paul Gosling, John Paul Peltola, Tomi Raffael, Barbara Richarz, Andrea-Nicole Sienkiewicz, Marta Whaley, Paul Worth, Andrew Whelan, Maurice Comput Toxicol Article As the basis for managing the risks of chemical exposure, the Chemical Risk Assessment (CRA) process can impact a substantial part of the economy, the health of hundreds of millions of people, and the condition of the environment. However, the number of properly assessed chemicals falls short of societal needs due to a lack of experts for evaluation, interference of third party interests, and the sheer volume of potentially relevant information on the chemicals from disparate sources. In order to explore ways in which computational methods may help overcome this discrepancy between the number of chemical risk assessments required on the one hand and the number and adequateness of assessments actually being conducted on the other, the European Commission's Joint Research Centre organised a workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Chemical Risk Assessment (AI4CRA). The workshop identified a number of areas where Artificial Intelligence could potentially increase the number and quality of regulatory risk management decisions based on CRA, involving process simulation, supporting evaluation, identifying problems, facilitating collaboration, finding experts, evidence gathering, systematic review, knowledge discovery, and building cognitive models. Although these are interconnected, they are organised and discussed under two main themes: scientific-technical process and social aspects and the decision making process. Elsevier B.V 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7043333/ /pubmed/32140631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2019.100114 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wittwehr, Clemens Blomstedt, Paul Gosling, John Paul Peltola, Tomi Raffael, Barbara Richarz, Andrea-Nicole Sienkiewicz, Marta Whaley, Paul Worth, Andrew Whelan, Maurice Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment |
title | Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment |
title_full | Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment |
title_fullStr | Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment |
title_short | Artificial Intelligence for chemical risk assessment |
title_sort | artificial intelligence for chemical risk assessment |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7043333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2019.100114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wittwehrclemens artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment AT blomstedtpaul artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment AT goslingjohnpaul artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment AT peltolatomi artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment AT raffaelbarbara artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment AT richarzandreanicole artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment AT sienkiewiczmarta artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment AT whaleypaul artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment AT worthandrew artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment AT whelanmaurice artificialintelligenceforchemicalriskassessment |