Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcomes and Costs for Biologically Based, Local Tissue Rearrangement, and Free Flap Reconstruction

Various surgical techniques exist for lower extremity reconstruction, but limited high-quality data exist to inform treatment strategies. Using multi-institutional data and rigorous matching, the authors evaluated the effectiveness and cost of three common surgical reconstructive modalities. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozak, Geoffrey M., Hsu, Jesse Y., Broach, Robyn B., Shakir, Sameer, Calvert, Catherine, Stranix, John. T, Messa, Charles, Levin, L. Scott, Serletti, Joseph M., Kovach, Stephen J., Fischer, John P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7043725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32097331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006589
_version_ 1783501444719050752
author Kozak, Geoffrey M.
Hsu, Jesse Y.
Broach, Robyn B.
Shakir, Sameer
Calvert, Catherine
Stranix, John. T
Messa, Charles
Levin, L. Scott
Serletti, Joseph M.
Kovach, Stephen J.
Fischer, John P.
author_facet Kozak, Geoffrey M.
Hsu, Jesse Y.
Broach, Robyn B.
Shakir, Sameer
Calvert, Catherine
Stranix, John. T
Messa, Charles
Levin, L. Scott
Serletti, Joseph M.
Kovach, Stephen J.
Fischer, John P.
author_sort Kozak, Geoffrey M.
collection PubMed
description Various surgical techniques exist for lower extremity reconstruction, but limited high-quality data exist to inform treatment strategies. Using multi-institutional data and rigorous matching, the authors evaluated the effectiveness and cost of three common surgical reconstructive modalities. METHODS: All adult subjects with lower extremity wounds who received bilayer wound matrix, local tissue rearrangement, or free flap reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed (from 2010 to 2017). Cohorts’ comorbidities and wound characteristics were balanced. Graft success at 180 days was the primary outcome; readmissions, reoperations, and costs were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Five hundred one subjects (166 matrix, 190 rearrangement, and 145 free flap patients) were evaluated. Matched subjects (n = 312; 104/group) were analyzed. Reconstruction success at 180 days for matrix, local tissue rearrangement, and free flaps was 69.2 percent, 91.3 percent, and 93.3 percent (p < 0.001), and total costs per subject were $34,877, $35,220, and $53,492 (p < 0.001), respectively. Median length of stay was at least 2 days longer for free flaps (p < 0.0001). Readmissions and reoperations were greater for free flaps. Local tissue rearrangement, if achievable, provided success at low cost. Free flaps were effective with large, traumatic wounds but at higher costs and longer length of stay. Matrices successfully treated older, obese patients without exposed bone. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity reconstruction can be performed effectively using multiple modalities with varying degrees of success and costs. Local tissue rearrangement and free flaps demonstrate success rates greater than 90 percent. Bilayer wound matrix-based reconstruction effectively treats a distinct patient population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7043725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70437252020-03-10 Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcomes and Costs for Biologically Based, Local Tissue Rearrangement, and Free Flap Reconstruction Kozak, Geoffrey M. Hsu, Jesse Y. Broach, Robyn B. Shakir, Sameer Calvert, Catherine Stranix, John. T Messa, Charles Levin, L. Scott Serletti, Joseph M. Kovach, Stephen J. Fischer, John P. Plast Reconstr Surg Reconstructive: Lower Extremity: Original Articles Various surgical techniques exist for lower extremity reconstruction, but limited high-quality data exist to inform treatment strategies. Using multi-institutional data and rigorous matching, the authors evaluated the effectiveness and cost of three common surgical reconstructive modalities. METHODS: All adult subjects with lower extremity wounds who received bilayer wound matrix, local tissue rearrangement, or free flap reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed (from 2010 to 2017). Cohorts’ comorbidities and wound characteristics were balanced. Graft success at 180 days was the primary outcome; readmissions, reoperations, and costs were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Five hundred one subjects (166 matrix, 190 rearrangement, and 145 free flap patients) were evaluated. Matched subjects (n = 312; 104/group) were analyzed. Reconstruction success at 180 days for matrix, local tissue rearrangement, and free flaps was 69.2 percent, 91.3 percent, and 93.3 percent (p < 0.001), and total costs per subject were $34,877, $35,220, and $53,492 (p < 0.001), respectively. Median length of stay was at least 2 days longer for free flaps (p < 0.0001). Readmissions and reoperations were greater for free flaps. Local tissue rearrangement, if achievable, provided success at low cost. Free flaps were effective with large, traumatic wounds but at higher costs and longer length of stay. Matrices successfully treated older, obese patients without exposed bone. CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity reconstruction can be performed effectively using multiple modalities with varying degrees of success and costs. Local tissue rearrangement and free flaps demonstrate success rates greater than 90 percent. Bilayer wound matrix-based reconstruction effectively treats a distinct patient population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-03 2000-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7043725/ /pubmed/32097331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006589 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reconstructive: Lower Extremity: Original Articles
Kozak, Geoffrey M.
Hsu, Jesse Y.
Broach, Robyn B.
Shakir, Sameer
Calvert, Catherine
Stranix, John. T
Messa, Charles
Levin, L. Scott
Serletti, Joseph M.
Kovach, Stephen J.
Fischer, John P.
Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcomes and Costs for Biologically Based, Local Tissue Rearrangement, and Free Flap Reconstruction
title Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcomes and Costs for Biologically Based, Local Tissue Rearrangement, and Free Flap Reconstruction
title_full Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcomes and Costs for Biologically Based, Local Tissue Rearrangement, and Free Flap Reconstruction
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcomes and Costs for Biologically Based, Local Tissue Rearrangement, and Free Flap Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcomes and Costs for Biologically Based, Local Tissue Rearrangement, and Free Flap Reconstruction
title_short Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Complex Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Outcomes and Costs for Biologically Based, Local Tissue Rearrangement, and Free Flap Reconstruction
title_sort comparative effectiveness analysis of complex lower extremity reconstruction: outcomes and costs for biologically based, local tissue rearrangement, and free flap reconstruction
topic Reconstructive: Lower Extremity: Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7043725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32097331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006589
work_keys_str_mv AT kozakgeoffreym comparativeeffectivenessanalysisofcomplexlowerextremityreconstructionoutcomesandcostsforbiologicallybasedlocaltissuerearrangementandfreeflapreconstruction
AT hsujessey comparativeeffectivenessanalysisofcomplexlowerextremityreconstructionoutcomesandcostsforbiologicallybasedlocaltissuerearrangementandfreeflapreconstruction
AT broachrobynb comparativeeffectivenessanalysisofcomplexlowerextremityreconstructionoutcomesandcostsforbiologicallybasedlocaltissuerearrangementandfreeflapreconstruction
AT shakirsameer comparativeeffectivenessanalysisofcomplexlowerextremityreconstructionoutcomesandcostsforbiologicallybasedlocaltissuerearrangementandfreeflapreconstruction
AT calvertcatherine comparativeeffectivenessanalysisofcomplexlowerextremityreconstructionoutcomesandcostsforbiologicallybasedlocaltissuerearrangementandfreeflapreconstruction
AT stranixjohnt comparativeeffectivenessanalysisofcomplexlowerextremityreconstructionoutcomesandcostsforbiologicallybasedlocaltissuerearrangementandfreeflapreconstruction
AT messacharles comparativeeffectivenessanalysisofcomplexlowerextremityreconstructionoutcomesandcostsforbiologicallybasedlocaltissuerearrangementandfreeflapreconstruction
AT levinlscott comparativeeffectivenessanalysisofcomplexlowerextremityreconstructionoutcomesandcostsforbiologicallybasedlocaltissuerearrangementandfreeflapreconstruction
AT serlettijosephm comparativeeffectivenessanalysisofcomplexlowerextremityreconstructionoutcomesandcostsforbiologicallybasedlocaltissuerearrangementandfreeflapreconstruction
AT kovachstephenj comparativeeffectivenessanalysisofcomplexlowerextremityreconstructionoutcomesandcostsforbiologicallybasedlocaltissuerearrangementandfreeflapreconstruction
AT fischerjohnp comparativeeffectivenessanalysisofcomplexlowerextremityreconstructionoutcomesandcostsforbiologicallybasedlocaltissuerearrangementandfreeflapreconstruction