Cargando…

The uptake of population size estimation studies for key populations in guiding HIV responses on the African continent

BACKGROUND: There has been a heightened emphasis on prioritizing data to inform evidence-based HIV responses, including data focused on both defining the content and scale of HIV programs in response to evidence-based need. Consequently, population size estimation (PSE) studies for key populations h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viswasam, Nikita, Lyons, Carrie E., MacAllister, Jack, Millett, Greg, Sherwood, Jennifer, Rao, Amrita, Baral, Stefan D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7043736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32101551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228634
_version_ 1783501447311130624
author Viswasam, Nikita
Lyons, Carrie E.
MacAllister, Jack
Millett, Greg
Sherwood, Jennifer
Rao, Amrita
Baral, Stefan D.
author_facet Viswasam, Nikita
Lyons, Carrie E.
MacAllister, Jack
Millett, Greg
Sherwood, Jennifer
Rao, Amrita
Baral, Stefan D.
author_sort Viswasam, Nikita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There has been a heightened emphasis on prioritizing data to inform evidence-based HIV responses, including data focused on both defining the content and scale of HIV programs in response to evidence-based need. Consequently, population size estimation (PSE) studies for key populations have become increasingly common to define the necessary scale of specific programs for key populations. This study aims to assess the research utilization of these size estimates in informing HIV policy and program documents across the African continent. METHODS: This study included two phases; Phase 1 was a review of all PSE for key populations, including men who have sex with men (MSM), female sex workers (FSW), people who use drugs (PWUD), and transgender persons in the 54 countries across Africa published from January 2009—December 2017. Phase 2 was a review of 23 different types of documents released between January 2009 –January 2019, with a focus on the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria investments, for evidence of stakeholder engagement in PSE studies, as well as key population PSE research utilization to inform HIV programming and international HIV investments. RESULTS: Of 118 size estimates identified in 39 studies, less than 15% were utilized in PEPFAR Country Operational Plans or national strategic health plan documents, and less than 2% in Global Fund Concept Notes. Of 39 PSE studies, over 50% engaged stakeholders in study implementation and identified target population stakeholders, a third of studies identified policy or program stakeholders, and 15% involved stakeholders in study design. CONCLUSION: The past decade has seen an increase in PSE studies conducted for key populations in more generalized HIV epidemic settings which involve significant investments of finances and human resources. However, there remains limited evidence of sustained uptake of these data to guide the HIV responses. Increasing uptake necessitates effective stakeholder engagement and data-oriented capacity building to optimize research utilization and facilitate data-driven and human rights-affirming HIV responses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7043736
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70437362020-03-09 The uptake of population size estimation studies for key populations in guiding HIV responses on the African continent Viswasam, Nikita Lyons, Carrie E. MacAllister, Jack Millett, Greg Sherwood, Jennifer Rao, Amrita Baral, Stefan D. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: There has been a heightened emphasis on prioritizing data to inform evidence-based HIV responses, including data focused on both defining the content and scale of HIV programs in response to evidence-based need. Consequently, population size estimation (PSE) studies for key populations have become increasingly common to define the necessary scale of specific programs for key populations. This study aims to assess the research utilization of these size estimates in informing HIV policy and program documents across the African continent. METHODS: This study included two phases; Phase 1 was a review of all PSE for key populations, including men who have sex with men (MSM), female sex workers (FSW), people who use drugs (PWUD), and transgender persons in the 54 countries across Africa published from January 2009—December 2017. Phase 2 was a review of 23 different types of documents released between January 2009 –January 2019, with a focus on the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria investments, for evidence of stakeholder engagement in PSE studies, as well as key population PSE research utilization to inform HIV programming and international HIV investments. RESULTS: Of 118 size estimates identified in 39 studies, less than 15% were utilized in PEPFAR Country Operational Plans or national strategic health plan documents, and less than 2% in Global Fund Concept Notes. Of 39 PSE studies, over 50% engaged stakeholders in study implementation and identified target population stakeholders, a third of studies identified policy or program stakeholders, and 15% involved stakeholders in study design. CONCLUSION: The past decade has seen an increase in PSE studies conducted for key populations in more generalized HIV epidemic settings which involve significant investments of finances and human resources. However, there remains limited evidence of sustained uptake of these data to guide the HIV responses. Increasing uptake necessitates effective stakeholder engagement and data-oriented capacity building to optimize research utilization and facilitate data-driven and human rights-affirming HIV responses. Public Library of Science 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7043736/ /pubmed/32101551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228634 Text en © 2020 Viswasam et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Viswasam, Nikita
Lyons, Carrie E.
MacAllister, Jack
Millett, Greg
Sherwood, Jennifer
Rao, Amrita
Baral, Stefan D.
The uptake of population size estimation studies for key populations in guiding HIV responses on the African continent
title The uptake of population size estimation studies for key populations in guiding HIV responses on the African continent
title_full The uptake of population size estimation studies for key populations in guiding HIV responses on the African continent
title_fullStr The uptake of population size estimation studies for key populations in guiding HIV responses on the African continent
title_full_unstemmed The uptake of population size estimation studies for key populations in guiding HIV responses on the African continent
title_short The uptake of population size estimation studies for key populations in guiding HIV responses on the African continent
title_sort uptake of population size estimation studies for key populations in guiding hiv responses on the african continent
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7043736/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32101551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228634
work_keys_str_mv AT viswasamnikita theuptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT lyonscarriee theuptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT macallisterjack theuptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT millettgreg theuptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT sherwoodjennifer theuptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT raoamrita theuptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT baralstefand theuptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT theuptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT viswasamnikita uptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT lyonscarriee uptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT macallisterjack uptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT millettgreg uptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT sherwoodjennifer uptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT raoamrita uptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT baralstefand uptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent
AT uptakeofpopulationsizeestimationstudiesforkeypopulationsinguidinghivresponsesontheafricancontinent