Cargando…
Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication
BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a safe and routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for evaluation of large bowel diseases. Most common procedure related complications include bleeding and perforation but rarely a splenic Injury. AIM: To investigate the reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128029 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v12.i2.55 |
_version_ | 1783501495436574720 |
---|---|
author | Ullah, Waqas Rashid, Mamoon Ur Mehmood, Asif Zafar, Yousaf Hussain, Ishtiaq Sarvepalli, Deepika Hasan, Muhammad Khalid |
author_facet | Ullah, Waqas Rashid, Mamoon Ur Mehmood, Asif Zafar, Yousaf Hussain, Ishtiaq Sarvepalli, Deepika Hasan, Muhammad Khalid |
author_sort | Ullah, Waqas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a safe and routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for evaluation of large bowel diseases. Most common procedure related complications include bleeding and perforation but rarely a splenic Injury. AIM: To investigate the reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient with spleen injury, types of injury, diagnosis, management and outcomes of patients METHODS: A structured search on four databases was done and 45 articles with 68 patients were selected. The reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient with spleen injury, types of injury, diagnosis, management and outcomes of patients were identified and analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62.7 years with 64% females. Twenty two percent had a complete splenic rupture with colonoscopy while 63% had subcapsular hematoma, spleen laceration and spleen avulsion. The most common reason for colonoscopy was screening (46%) followed by diagnostic colonoscopy (28%). Eighty seven percent of patients presented with abdominal pain. Patients with spleen rupture mostly required splenectomy (47%), while minor spleen hematomas and lacerations were managed conservatively (38%). Six percent of the patients were managed with proximal splenic artery splenic embolization and 4% were managed with laparoscopic repair. The overall mortality was 10% while 77% had complete recovery. The reason of colonoscopy against presentation specifically, abdominal pain showed no statistical significance P = 0.69. The indication of colonoscopy had no significant impact on incidence of splenic injury (P = 0.89). Majority of the patients (47%) were managed with splenectomy while the rest were managed conservatively (P = 0.04). This association was moderately strong at a cramer’s V test (0.34). The Fisher exact test showed a higher mortality with spleen rupture (P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Spleen rupture due to colonoscopy is a significant concern and is associated with high mortality. The management of the patients can be individualized based on clinical presentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7044106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70441062020-03-03 Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication Ullah, Waqas Rashid, Mamoon Ur Mehmood, Asif Zafar, Yousaf Hussain, Ishtiaq Sarvepalli, Deepika Hasan, Muhammad Khalid World J Gastrointest Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a safe and routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for evaluation of large bowel diseases. Most common procedure related complications include bleeding and perforation but rarely a splenic Injury. AIM: To investigate the reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient with spleen injury, types of injury, diagnosis, management and outcomes of patients METHODS: A structured search on four databases was done and 45 articles with 68 patients were selected. The reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient with spleen injury, types of injury, diagnosis, management and outcomes of patients were identified and analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62.7 years with 64% females. Twenty two percent had a complete splenic rupture with colonoscopy while 63% had subcapsular hematoma, spleen laceration and spleen avulsion. The most common reason for colonoscopy was screening (46%) followed by diagnostic colonoscopy (28%). Eighty seven percent of patients presented with abdominal pain. Patients with spleen rupture mostly required splenectomy (47%), while minor spleen hematomas and lacerations were managed conservatively (38%). Six percent of the patients were managed with proximal splenic artery splenic embolization and 4% were managed with laparoscopic repair. The overall mortality was 10% while 77% had complete recovery. The reason of colonoscopy against presentation specifically, abdominal pain showed no statistical significance P = 0.69. The indication of colonoscopy had no significant impact on incidence of splenic injury (P = 0.89). Majority of the patients (47%) were managed with splenectomy while the rest were managed conservatively (P = 0.04). This association was moderately strong at a cramer’s V test (0.34). The Fisher exact test showed a higher mortality with spleen rupture (P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Spleen rupture due to colonoscopy is a significant concern and is associated with high mortality. The management of the patients can be individualized based on clinical presentation. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-02-27 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7044106/ /pubmed/32128029 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v12.i2.55 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Ullah, Waqas Rashid, Mamoon Ur Mehmood, Asif Zafar, Yousaf Hussain, Ishtiaq Sarvepalli, Deepika Hasan, Muhammad Khalid Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication |
title | Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication |
title_full | Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication |
title_fullStr | Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication |
title_full_unstemmed | Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication |
title_short | Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication |
title_sort | splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: rare but serious complication |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128029 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v12.i2.55 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ullahwaqas splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication AT rashidmamoonur splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication AT mehmoodasif splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication AT zafaryousaf splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication AT hussainishtiaq splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication AT sarvepallideepika splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication AT hasanmuhammadkhalid splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication |