Cargando…

Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a safe and routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for evaluation of large bowel diseases. Most common procedure related complications include bleeding and perforation but rarely a splenic Injury. AIM: To investigate the reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ullah, Waqas, Rashid, Mamoon Ur, Mehmood, Asif, Zafar, Yousaf, Hussain, Ishtiaq, Sarvepalli, Deepika, Hasan, Muhammad Khalid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128029
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v12.i2.55
_version_ 1783501495436574720
author Ullah, Waqas
Rashid, Mamoon Ur
Mehmood, Asif
Zafar, Yousaf
Hussain, Ishtiaq
Sarvepalli, Deepika
Hasan, Muhammad Khalid
author_facet Ullah, Waqas
Rashid, Mamoon Ur
Mehmood, Asif
Zafar, Yousaf
Hussain, Ishtiaq
Sarvepalli, Deepika
Hasan, Muhammad Khalid
author_sort Ullah, Waqas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a safe and routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for evaluation of large bowel diseases. Most common procedure related complications include bleeding and perforation but rarely a splenic Injury. AIM: To investigate the reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient with spleen injury, types of injury, diagnosis, management and outcomes of patients METHODS: A structured search on four databases was done and 45 articles with 68 patients were selected. The reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient with spleen injury, types of injury, diagnosis, management and outcomes of patients were identified and analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62.7 years with 64% females. Twenty two percent had a complete splenic rupture with colonoscopy while 63% had subcapsular hematoma, spleen laceration and spleen avulsion. The most common reason for colonoscopy was screening (46%) followed by diagnostic colonoscopy (28%). Eighty seven percent of patients presented with abdominal pain. Patients with spleen rupture mostly required splenectomy (47%), while minor spleen hematomas and lacerations were managed conservatively (38%). Six percent of the patients were managed with proximal splenic artery splenic embolization and 4% were managed with laparoscopic repair. The overall mortality was 10% while 77% had complete recovery. The reason of colonoscopy against presentation specifically, abdominal pain showed no statistical significance P = 0.69. The indication of colonoscopy had no significant impact on incidence of splenic injury (P = 0.89). Majority of the patients (47%) were managed with splenectomy while the rest were managed conservatively (P = 0.04). This association was moderately strong at a cramer’s V test (0.34). The Fisher exact test showed a higher mortality with spleen rupture (P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Spleen rupture due to colonoscopy is a significant concern and is associated with high mortality. The management of the patients can be individualized based on clinical presentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7044106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70441062020-03-03 Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication Ullah, Waqas Rashid, Mamoon Ur Mehmood, Asif Zafar, Yousaf Hussain, Ishtiaq Sarvepalli, Deepika Hasan, Muhammad Khalid World J Gastrointest Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a safe and routine diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for evaluation of large bowel diseases. Most common procedure related complications include bleeding and perforation but rarely a splenic Injury. AIM: To investigate the reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient with spleen injury, types of injury, diagnosis, management and outcomes of patients METHODS: A structured search on four databases was done and 45 articles with 68 patients were selected. The reason for colonoscopy, presentation of patient with spleen injury, types of injury, diagnosis, management and outcomes of patients were identified and analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 62.7 years with 64% females. Twenty two percent had a complete splenic rupture with colonoscopy while 63% had subcapsular hematoma, spleen laceration and spleen avulsion. The most common reason for colonoscopy was screening (46%) followed by diagnostic colonoscopy (28%). Eighty seven percent of patients presented with abdominal pain. Patients with spleen rupture mostly required splenectomy (47%), while minor spleen hematomas and lacerations were managed conservatively (38%). Six percent of the patients were managed with proximal splenic artery splenic embolization and 4% were managed with laparoscopic repair. The overall mortality was 10% while 77% had complete recovery. The reason of colonoscopy against presentation specifically, abdominal pain showed no statistical significance P = 0.69. The indication of colonoscopy had no significant impact on incidence of splenic injury (P = 0.89). Majority of the patients (47%) were managed with splenectomy while the rest were managed conservatively (P = 0.04). This association was moderately strong at a cramer’s V test (0.34). The Fisher exact test showed a higher mortality with spleen rupture (P = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Spleen rupture due to colonoscopy is a significant concern and is associated with high mortality. The management of the patients can be individualized based on clinical presentation. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-02-27 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7044106/ /pubmed/32128029 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v12.i2.55 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Ullah, Waqas
Rashid, Mamoon Ur
Mehmood, Asif
Zafar, Yousaf
Hussain, Ishtiaq
Sarvepalli, Deepika
Hasan, Muhammad Khalid
Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication
title Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication
title_full Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication
title_fullStr Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication
title_full_unstemmed Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication
title_short Splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: Rare but serious complication
title_sort splenic injuries secondary to colonoscopy: rare but serious complication
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128029
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v12.i2.55
work_keys_str_mv AT ullahwaqas splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication
AT rashidmamoonur splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication
AT mehmoodasif splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication
AT zafaryousaf splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication
AT hussainishtiaq splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication
AT sarvepallideepika splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication
AT hasanmuhammadkhalid splenicinjuriessecondarytocolonoscopyrarebutseriouscomplication