Cargando…

The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies

Societal changes and the increasing desire and opportunity to preserve fertility have increased the demand for effective assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and have increased the range of scenarios in which ART is now used. In recent years, the “freeze-all” strategy of cryopreserving all oocyt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosch, Ernesto, De Vos, Michel, Humaidan, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32153506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00067
_version_ 1783501498930429952
author Bosch, Ernesto
De Vos, Michel
Humaidan, Peter
author_facet Bosch, Ernesto
De Vos, Michel
Humaidan, Peter
author_sort Bosch, Ernesto
collection PubMed
description Societal changes and the increasing desire and opportunity to preserve fertility have increased the demand for effective assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and have increased the range of scenarios in which ART is now used. In recent years, the “freeze-all” strategy of cryopreserving all oocytes or good quality embryos produced in an IVF cycle to transfer later—at a time that is more appropriate for reasons of medical need, efficacy, or desirability—has emerged as an accepted and valuable alternative to fresh embryo transfer. Indeed, improvements in cryopreservation techniques (vitrification) and the development of more efficient ovarian stimulation protocols have facilitated a dramatic increase in the practice of elective frozen embryo transfer (eFET). Alongside these advances, debate continues about whether eFET should be a standard treatment option available to the whole IVF population or if it is important to identify patient subgroups who are most likely to benefit from such an approach. Achieving successful outcomes in ART, whether by fresh or frozen embryo transfer, is influenced by a wide range of factors. As well as the efficiency of IVF and embryo transfer protocols and techniques, factors affecting implantation include maternal aging, sperm quality, the vaginal and endometrial microbiome, and peri-implantation levels of serum progesterone. The safety of eFET, both during ART cycles and on longer-term obstetric and neonatal outcomes, is also an important consideration. In this review, we explore the benefits and risks of freeze-all strategies in different scenarios. We review available evidence on the outcomes achieved with elective cryopreservation strategies and practices and how these compare with more traditional IVF cycles with fresh embryo transfers, both in the general IVF population and in subgroups of special interest. In addition, we consider how to optimize and individualize “freeze-all” procedures to achieve successful reproductive outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7044122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70441222020-03-09 The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies Bosch, Ernesto De Vos, Michel Humaidan, Peter Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Societal changes and the increasing desire and opportunity to preserve fertility have increased the demand for effective assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and have increased the range of scenarios in which ART is now used. In recent years, the “freeze-all” strategy of cryopreserving all oocytes or good quality embryos produced in an IVF cycle to transfer later—at a time that is more appropriate for reasons of medical need, efficacy, or desirability—has emerged as an accepted and valuable alternative to fresh embryo transfer. Indeed, improvements in cryopreservation techniques (vitrification) and the development of more efficient ovarian stimulation protocols have facilitated a dramatic increase in the practice of elective frozen embryo transfer (eFET). Alongside these advances, debate continues about whether eFET should be a standard treatment option available to the whole IVF population or if it is important to identify patient subgroups who are most likely to benefit from such an approach. Achieving successful outcomes in ART, whether by fresh or frozen embryo transfer, is influenced by a wide range of factors. As well as the efficiency of IVF and embryo transfer protocols and techniques, factors affecting implantation include maternal aging, sperm quality, the vaginal and endometrial microbiome, and peri-implantation levels of serum progesterone. The safety of eFET, both during ART cycles and on longer-term obstetric and neonatal outcomes, is also an important consideration. In this review, we explore the benefits and risks of freeze-all strategies in different scenarios. We review available evidence on the outcomes achieved with elective cryopreservation strategies and practices and how these compare with more traditional IVF cycles with fresh embryo transfers, both in the general IVF population and in subgroups of special interest. In addition, we consider how to optimize and individualize “freeze-all” procedures to achieve successful reproductive outcomes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7044122/ /pubmed/32153506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00067 Text en Copyright © 2020 Bosch, De Vos and Humaidan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Bosch, Ernesto
De Vos, Michel
Humaidan, Peter
The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies
title The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies
title_full The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies
title_fullStr The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies
title_full_unstemmed The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies
title_short The Future of Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technologies
title_sort future of cryopreservation in assisted reproductive technologies
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32153506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00067
work_keys_str_mv AT boschernesto thefutureofcryopreservationinassistedreproductivetechnologies
AT devosmichel thefutureofcryopreservationinassistedreproductivetechnologies
AT humaidanpeter thefutureofcryopreservationinassistedreproductivetechnologies
AT boschernesto futureofcryopreservationinassistedreproductivetechnologies
AT devosmichel futureofcryopreservationinassistedreproductivetechnologies
AT humaidanpeter futureofcryopreservationinassistedreproductivetechnologies