Cargando…
Binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression
The brain combines sounds from the two ears, but what is the algorithm used to achieve this summation of signals? Here we combine psychophysical amplitude modulation discrimination and steady-state electroencephalography (EEG) data to investigate the architecture of binaural combination for amplitud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60602-5 |
_version_ | 1783501531569455104 |
---|---|
author | Baker, D. H. Vilidaite, G. McClarnon, E. Valkova, E. Bruno, A. Millman, R. E. |
author_facet | Baker, D. H. Vilidaite, G. McClarnon, E. Valkova, E. Bruno, A. Millman, R. E. |
author_sort | Baker, D. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The brain combines sounds from the two ears, but what is the algorithm used to achieve this summation of signals? Here we combine psychophysical amplitude modulation discrimination and steady-state electroencephalography (EEG) data to investigate the architecture of binaural combination for amplitude-modulated tones. Discrimination thresholds followed a ‘dipper’ shaped function of pedestal modulation depth, and were consistently lower for binaural than monaural presentation of modulated tones. The EEG responses were greater for binaural than monaural presentation of modulated tones, and when a masker was presented to one ear, it produced only weak suppression of the response to a signal presented to the other ear. Both data sets were well-fit by a computational model originally derived for visual signal combination, but with suppression between the two channels (ears) being much weaker than in binocular vision. We suggest that the distinct ecological constraints on vision and hearing can explain this difference, if it is assumed that the brain avoids over-representing sensory signals originating from a single object. These findings position our understanding of binaural summation in a broader context of work on sensory signal combination in the brain, and delineate the similarities and differences between vision and hearing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7044261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70442612020-03-04 Binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression Baker, D. H. Vilidaite, G. McClarnon, E. Valkova, E. Bruno, A. Millman, R. E. Sci Rep Article The brain combines sounds from the two ears, but what is the algorithm used to achieve this summation of signals? Here we combine psychophysical amplitude modulation discrimination and steady-state electroencephalography (EEG) data to investigate the architecture of binaural combination for amplitude-modulated tones. Discrimination thresholds followed a ‘dipper’ shaped function of pedestal modulation depth, and were consistently lower for binaural than monaural presentation of modulated tones. The EEG responses were greater for binaural than monaural presentation of modulated tones, and when a masker was presented to one ear, it produced only weak suppression of the response to a signal presented to the other ear. Both data sets were well-fit by a computational model originally derived for visual signal combination, but with suppression between the two channels (ears) being much weaker than in binocular vision. We suggest that the distinct ecological constraints on vision and hearing can explain this difference, if it is assumed that the brain avoids over-representing sensory signals originating from a single object. These findings position our understanding of binaural summation in a broader context of work on sensory signal combination in the brain, and delineate the similarities and differences between vision and hearing. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7044261/ /pubmed/32103139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60602-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons License, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons License, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons License and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this License, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Baker, D. H. Vilidaite, G. McClarnon, E. Valkova, E. Bruno, A. Millman, R. E. Binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression |
title | Binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression |
title_full | Binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression |
title_fullStr | Binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression |
title_full_unstemmed | Binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression |
title_short | Binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression |
title_sort | binaural summation of amplitude modulation involves weak interaural suppression |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60602-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakerdh binauralsummationofamplitudemodulationinvolvesweakinterauralsuppression AT vilidaiteg binauralsummationofamplitudemodulationinvolvesweakinterauralsuppression AT mcclarnone binauralsummationofamplitudemodulationinvolvesweakinterauralsuppression AT valkovae binauralsummationofamplitudemodulationinvolvesweakinterauralsuppression AT brunoa binauralsummationofamplitudemodulationinvolvesweakinterauralsuppression AT millmanre binauralsummationofamplitudemodulationinvolvesweakinterauralsuppression |