Cargando…
The psychometric evaluation of the Revised Exercise Addiction Inventory: Improved psychometric properties by changing item response rating
BACKGROUND: The Exercise Addiction Inventory (EAI) is a short, valid, and reliable instrument used to assess the risk for exercise addiction, and has already been used in numerous published studies. The EAI contains six items, rated on a 5-point scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree), which are...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Akadémiai Kiadó
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30920295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.06 |
_version_ | 1783501608841117696 |
---|---|
author | Attila, Szabo Amit, Pinto Mark D., Griffiths Rita, Kovácsik Zsolt, Demetrovics |
author_facet | Attila, Szabo Amit, Pinto Mark D., Griffiths Rita, Kovácsik Zsolt, Demetrovics |
author_sort | Attila, Szabo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Exercise Addiction Inventory (EAI) is a short, valid, and reliable instrument used to assess the risk for exercise addiction, and has already been used in numerous published studies. The EAI contains six items, rated on a 5-point scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree), which are based on the components model of addiction. The middle of the original scale (scoring 3 out of 5) reflects neither agreement nor disagreement, which conveys neutrality. However, the present authors believe that individual who provides a neutral opinion on each item (i.e., scoring 3) is a conceptual dilemma because it artificially increases the total score obtainable on the scale without yielding agreement or disagreement with a particular item. Indeed, the six items of the EAI are phrased in such way that respondents can either agree or disagree in the slightly to strongly range. METHODS: This study modified the EAI from a 5-point rating scale to a 6-point one, so that it eliminated a middle neutral response. A total of 277 exercising participants completed the Revised Exercise Addiction Inventory (EAI-R) and Exercise Dependence Scale. RESULTS: All psychometric properties of the EAI-R were superior to the originally published scale. CONCLUSION: Considering these findings, it is recommended that scholars now use the EAI-R in the future research if they need to assess the risk of exercise addiction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7044604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70446042020-03-06 The psychometric evaluation of the Revised Exercise Addiction Inventory: Improved psychometric properties by changing item response rating Attila, Szabo Amit, Pinto Mark D., Griffiths Rita, Kovácsik Zsolt, Demetrovics J Behav Addict Brief Report BACKGROUND: The Exercise Addiction Inventory (EAI) is a short, valid, and reliable instrument used to assess the risk for exercise addiction, and has already been used in numerous published studies. The EAI contains six items, rated on a 5-point scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree), which are based on the components model of addiction. The middle of the original scale (scoring 3 out of 5) reflects neither agreement nor disagreement, which conveys neutrality. However, the present authors believe that individual who provides a neutral opinion on each item (i.e., scoring 3) is a conceptual dilemma because it artificially increases the total score obtainable on the scale without yielding agreement or disagreement with a particular item. Indeed, the six items of the EAI are phrased in such way that respondents can either agree or disagree in the slightly to strongly range. METHODS: This study modified the EAI from a 5-point rating scale to a 6-point one, so that it eliminated a middle neutral response. A total of 277 exercising participants completed the Revised Exercise Addiction Inventory (EAI-R) and Exercise Dependence Scale. RESULTS: All psychometric properties of the EAI-R were superior to the originally published scale. CONCLUSION: Considering these findings, it is recommended that scholars now use the EAI-R in the future research if they need to assess the risk of exercise addiction. Akadémiai Kiadó 2019-03-28 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7044604/ /pubmed/30920295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.06 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the CC License is provided, and changes – if any – are indicated. (SID_1) |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Attila, Szabo Amit, Pinto Mark D., Griffiths Rita, Kovácsik Zsolt, Demetrovics The psychometric evaluation of the Revised Exercise Addiction Inventory: Improved psychometric properties by changing item response rating |
title | The psychometric evaluation of the Revised Exercise Addiction Inventory: Improved psychometric properties by changing item response rating |
title_full | The psychometric evaluation of the Revised Exercise Addiction Inventory: Improved psychometric properties by changing item response rating |
title_fullStr | The psychometric evaluation of the Revised Exercise Addiction Inventory: Improved psychometric properties by changing item response rating |
title_full_unstemmed | The psychometric evaluation of the Revised Exercise Addiction Inventory: Improved psychometric properties by changing item response rating |
title_short | The psychometric evaluation of the Revised Exercise Addiction Inventory: Improved psychometric properties by changing item response rating |
title_sort | psychometric evaluation of the revised exercise addiction inventory: improved psychometric properties by changing item response rating |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30920295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.06 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT attilaszabo thepsychometricevaluationoftherevisedexerciseaddictioninventoryimprovedpsychometricpropertiesbychangingitemresponserating AT amitpinto thepsychometricevaluationoftherevisedexerciseaddictioninventoryimprovedpsychometricpropertiesbychangingitemresponserating AT markdgriffiths thepsychometricevaluationoftherevisedexerciseaddictioninventoryimprovedpsychometricpropertiesbychangingitemresponserating AT ritakovacsik thepsychometricevaluationoftherevisedexerciseaddictioninventoryimprovedpsychometricpropertiesbychangingitemresponserating AT zsoltdemetrovics thepsychometricevaluationoftherevisedexerciseaddictioninventoryimprovedpsychometricpropertiesbychangingitemresponserating AT attilaszabo psychometricevaluationoftherevisedexerciseaddictioninventoryimprovedpsychometricpropertiesbychangingitemresponserating AT amitpinto psychometricevaluationoftherevisedexerciseaddictioninventoryimprovedpsychometricpropertiesbychangingitemresponserating AT markdgriffiths psychometricevaluationoftherevisedexerciseaddictioninventoryimprovedpsychometricpropertiesbychangingitemresponserating AT ritakovacsik psychometricevaluationoftherevisedexerciseaddictioninventoryimprovedpsychometricpropertiesbychangingitemresponserating AT zsoltdemetrovics psychometricevaluationoftherevisedexerciseaddictioninventoryimprovedpsychometricpropertiesbychangingitemresponserating |