Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial

OBJECTIVES: Cetuximab plus leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) is superior to FOLFOX-4 alone as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with RAS wild-type (RAS wt mCRC), with significantly improved survival benefit by TAILOR, an open-label, randomised, m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Huijuan, Huang, Lingfei, Gao, Peng, Zhu, Zhengyi, Ye, Weifeng, Ding, Haiying, Fang, Luo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32051297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030738
_version_ 1783501646613970944
author Wang, Huijuan
Huang, Lingfei
Gao, Peng
Zhu, Zhengyi
Ye, Weifeng
Ding, Haiying
Fang, Luo
author_facet Wang, Huijuan
Huang, Lingfei
Gao, Peng
Zhu, Zhengyi
Ye, Weifeng
Ding, Haiying
Fang, Luo
author_sort Wang, Huijuan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Cetuximab plus leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) is superior to FOLFOX-4 alone as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with RAS wild-type (RAS wt mCRC), with significantly improved survival benefit by TAILOR, an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase III trial. Nevertheless, the cost-effectiveness of these two regimens remains uncertain. The following study aims to determine whether cetuximab combined with FOLFOX-4 is a cost-effective regimen for patients with specific RAS wt mCRC in China. DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness model combined decision tree and Markov model was built to simulate pateints with RAS wt mCRC based on health states of dead, progressive and stable. The health outcomes from the TAILOR trial and utilities from published data were used respectively. Costs were calculated with reference to the Chinese societal perspective. The robustness of the results was evaluated by univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. PARTICIPANTS: The included patients were newly diagnosed Chinese patients with fully RAS wt mCRC. INTERVENTIONS: First-line treatment with either cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 or FOLFOX-4. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes are costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: Baseline analysis disclosed that the QALYs was increased by 0.383 caused by additional cetuximab, while an increase of US$62 947 was observed in relation to FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy. The ICER was US$164 044 per QALY, which exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$28 106 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the survival benefit, cetuximab combined with FOLFOX-4 is not a cost-effective treatment for the first-line regime of patients with RAS wt mCRC in China. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: TAILOR trial (NCT01228734); Post-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7044820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70448202020-03-09 Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial Wang, Huijuan Huang, Lingfei Gao, Peng Zhu, Zhengyi Ye, Weifeng Ding, Haiying Fang, Luo BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: Cetuximab plus leucovorin, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) is superior to FOLFOX-4 alone as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with RAS wild-type (RAS wt mCRC), with significantly improved survival benefit by TAILOR, an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase III trial. Nevertheless, the cost-effectiveness of these two regimens remains uncertain. The following study aims to determine whether cetuximab combined with FOLFOX-4 is a cost-effective regimen for patients with specific RAS wt mCRC in China. DESIGN: A cost-effectiveness model combined decision tree and Markov model was built to simulate pateints with RAS wt mCRC based on health states of dead, progressive and stable. The health outcomes from the TAILOR trial and utilities from published data were used respectively. Costs were calculated with reference to the Chinese societal perspective. The robustness of the results was evaluated by univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. PARTICIPANTS: The included patients were newly diagnosed Chinese patients with fully RAS wt mCRC. INTERVENTIONS: First-line treatment with either cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 or FOLFOX-4. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes are costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: Baseline analysis disclosed that the QALYs was increased by 0.383 caused by additional cetuximab, while an increase of US$62 947 was observed in relation to FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy. The ICER was US$164 044 per QALY, which exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$28 106 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the survival benefit, cetuximab combined with FOLFOX-4 is not a cost-effective treatment for the first-line regime of patients with RAS wt mCRC in China. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: TAILOR trial (NCT01228734); Post-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7044820/ /pubmed/32051297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030738 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Wang, Huijuan
Huang, Lingfei
Gao, Peng
Zhu, Zhengyi
Ye, Weifeng
Ding, Haiying
Fang, Luo
Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the TAILOR trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with ras wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer based on the tailor trial
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32051297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030738
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghuijuan costeffectivenessanalysisofcetuximabcombinedwithchemotherapyasafirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancerbasedonthetailortrial
AT huanglingfei costeffectivenessanalysisofcetuximabcombinedwithchemotherapyasafirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancerbasedonthetailortrial
AT gaopeng costeffectivenessanalysisofcetuximabcombinedwithchemotherapyasafirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancerbasedonthetailortrial
AT zhuzhengyi costeffectivenessanalysisofcetuximabcombinedwithchemotherapyasafirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancerbasedonthetailortrial
AT yeweifeng costeffectivenessanalysisofcetuximabcombinedwithchemotherapyasafirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancerbasedonthetailortrial
AT dinghaiying costeffectivenessanalysisofcetuximabcombinedwithchemotherapyasafirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancerbasedonthetailortrial
AT fangluo costeffectivenessanalysisofcetuximabcombinedwithchemotherapyasafirstlinetreatmentforpatientswithraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancerbasedonthetailortrial