Cargando…

Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study

OBJECTIVES: Dyspnoea and chest pain are symptoms shared with multiple pathologies ranging from the benign to life-threatening diseases. A Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) has been validated to measure the general practitioner’s (GPs) sense of alarm or sense of reassurance. The aim of the study was t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barais, Marie, Fossard, Emilie, Dany, Antoine, Montier, Tristan, Stolper, Erik, Van Royen, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034348
_version_ 1783501650430787584
author Barais, Marie
Fossard, Emilie
Dany, Antoine
Montier, Tristan
Stolper, Erik
Van Royen, Paul
author_facet Barais, Marie
Fossard, Emilie
Dany, Antoine
Montier, Tristan
Stolper, Erik
Van Royen, Paul
author_sort Barais, Marie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Dyspnoea and chest pain are symptoms shared with multiple pathologies ranging from the benign to life-threatening diseases. A Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) has been validated to measure the general practitioner’s (GPs) sense of alarm or sense of reassurance. The aim of the study was to estimate the diagnostic test accuracy of GPs’ sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and chest pain. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Prospective observational study in general practice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged between 18 and 80 years, consulting their GP for dyspnoea and/or chest pain, were considered for enrolment. These GPs had to complete the GFQ immediately after the consultation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Life-threatening and non-life-threatening diseases have previously been defined according to the pathologies or symptoms in the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC)-2 classification. The index test was the sense of alarm and the reference standard was the final diagnosis at 4 weeks. RESULTS: 25 GPs filled in 235 GFQ questionnaires. The positive likelihood ratio for the sense of alarm was 2.12 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.82), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.55 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Where the physician experienced a sense of alarm when a patient consulted him/her for dyspnoea and/or chest pain, the post-test odds that this patient had, in fact, a life-threatening disease was about twice as high as the pretest odds. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02932982.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7044836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70448362020-03-09 Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study Barais, Marie Fossard, Emilie Dany, Antoine Montier, Tristan Stolper, Erik Van Royen, Paul BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Dyspnoea and chest pain are symptoms shared with multiple pathologies ranging from the benign to life-threatening diseases. A Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) has been validated to measure the general practitioner’s (GPs) sense of alarm or sense of reassurance. The aim of the study was to estimate the diagnostic test accuracy of GPs’ sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and chest pain. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Prospective observational study in general practice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged between 18 and 80 years, consulting their GP for dyspnoea and/or chest pain, were considered for enrolment. These GPs had to complete the GFQ immediately after the consultation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Life-threatening and non-life-threatening diseases have previously been defined according to the pathologies or symptoms in the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC)-2 classification. The index test was the sense of alarm and the reference standard was the final diagnosis at 4 weeks. RESULTS: 25 GPs filled in 235 GFQ questionnaires. The positive likelihood ratio for the sense of alarm was 2.12 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.82), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.55 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Where the physician experienced a sense of alarm when a patient consulted him/her for dyspnoea and/or chest pain, the post-test odds that this patient had, in fact, a life-threatening disease was about twice as high as the pretest odds. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02932982. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7044836/ /pubmed/32075841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034348 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Barais, Marie
Fossard, Emilie
Dany, Antoine
Montier, Tristan
Stolper, Erik
Van Royen, Paul
Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study
title Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study
title_full Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study
title_short Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study
title_sort accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034348
work_keys_str_mv AT baraismarie accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT fossardemilie accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT danyantoine accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT montiertristan accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT stolpererik accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vanroyenpaul accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy