Cargando…
Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study
OBJECTIVES: Dyspnoea and chest pain are symptoms shared with multiple pathologies ranging from the benign to life-threatening diseases. A Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) has been validated to measure the general practitioner’s (GPs) sense of alarm or sense of reassurance. The aim of the study was t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034348 |
_version_ | 1783501650430787584 |
---|---|
author | Barais, Marie Fossard, Emilie Dany, Antoine Montier, Tristan Stolper, Erik Van Royen, Paul |
author_facet | Barais, Marie Fossard, Emilie Dany, Antoine Montier, Tristan Stolper, Erik Van Royen, Paul |
author_sort | Barais, Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Dyspnoea and chest pain are symptoms shared with multiple pathologies ranging from the benign to life-threatening diseases. A Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) has been validated to measure the general practitioner’s (GPs) sense of alarm or sense of reassurance. The aim of the study was to estimate the diagnostic test accuracy of GPs’ sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and chest pain. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Prospective observational study in general practice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged between 18 and 80 years, consulting their GP for dyspnoea and/or chest pain, were considered for enrolment. These GPs had to complete the GFQ immediately after the consultation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Life-threatening and non-life-threatening diseases have previously been defined according to the pathologies or symptoms in the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC)-2 classification. The index test was the sense of alarm and the reference standard was the final diagnosis at 4 weeks. RESULTS: 25 GPs filled in 235 GFQ questionnaires. The positive likelihood ratio for the sense of alarm was 2.12 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.82), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.55 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Where the physician experienced a sense of alarm when a patient consulted him/her for dyspnoea and/or chest pain, the post-test odds that this patient had, in fact, a life-threatening disease was about twice as high as the pretest odds. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02932982. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7044836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70448362020-03-09 Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study Barais, Marie Fossard, Emilie Dany, Antoine Montier, Tristan Stolper, Erik Van Royen, Paul BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Dyspnoea and chest pain are symptoms shared with multiple pathologies ranging from the benign to life-threatening diseases. A Gut Feelings Questionnaire (GFQ) has been validated to measure the general practitioner’s (GPs) sense of alarm or sense of reassurance. The aim of the study was to estimate the diagnostic test accuracy of GPs’ sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and chest pain. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Prospective observational study in general practice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged between 18 and 80 years, consulting their GP for dyspnoea and/or chest pain, were considered for enrolment. These GPs had to complete the GFQ immediately after the consultation. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Life-threatening and non-life-threatening diseases have previously been defined according to the pathologies or symptoms in the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC)-2 classification. The index test was the sense of alarm and the reference standard was the final diagnosis at 4 weeks. RESULTS: 25 GPs filled in 235 GFQ questionnaires. The positive likelihood ratio for the sense of alarm was 2.12 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.82), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.55 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Where the physician experienced a sense of alarm when a patient consulted him/her for dyspnoea and/or chest pain, the post-test odds that this patient had, in fact, a life-threatening disease was about twice as high as the pretest odds. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02932982. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7044836/ /pubmed/32075841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034348 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Barais, Marie Fossard, Emilie Dany, Antoine Montier, Tristan Stolper, Erik Van Royen, Paul Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study |
title | Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study |
title_full | Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study |
title_short | Accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study |
title_sort | accuracy of the general practitioner’s sense of alarm when confronted with dyspnoea and/or chest pain: a prospective observational study |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034348 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baraismarie accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT fossardemilie accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT danyantoine accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT montiertristan accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT stolpererik accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy AT vanroyenpaul accuracyofthegeneralpractitionerssenseofalarmwhenconfrontedwithdyspnoeaandorchestpainaprospectiveobservationalstudy |