Cargando…
The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review
OBJECTIVE: Exercise is an effective modality for the prevention and treatment of chronic conditions and family physicians are the healthcare providers tasked to manage patients’ chronic disease status. However, little is known about the exercise documentation in family-physician records. Therefore,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32054628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034542 |
_version_ | 1783501651831685120 |
---|---|
author | Lindeman, Cliff McCurdy, Ashley Lamboglia, Carminda G Wohlers, Brendan Pham, Anh N Q Sivak, Allison Spence, John C |
author_facet | Lindeman, Cliff McCurdy, Ashley Lamboglia, Carminda G Wohlers, Brendan Pham, Anh N Q Sivak, Allison Spence, John C |
author_sort | Lindeman, Cliff |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Exercise is an effective modality for the prevention and treatment of chronic conditions and family physicians are the healthcare providers tasked to manage patients’ chronic disease status. However, little is known about the exercise documentation in family-physician records. Therefore, a scoping review was conducted to describe family-physician-recorded exercise-related advice to patients in electronic medical records. DESIGN: Scoping review. SETTING: Primary care clinics. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Medline, SPORTDiscus, Google, Dissertations & Theses Global, OCLC PapersFirst (via First Search) and included references were searched between 1 January 1990 and 10 June 2018. Extracted information included year, geographic origin, data input structure, input frequency and content of exercise inputs in family physicians’ electronic medical records. The primary outcomes are the structure, purpose and frequency of inputs. RESULTS: Of a possible 1758 documents, 83 remained after a title and abstract scan and 22 after a full-text review. These documents included 32 findings of physical activity/exercise medical record documentation: counselling/advising patients (50.0%), status (12.5%), embedded questionnaires (12.5%), status as a risk factor (12.5%), health promotion documentation (6.3%), inactivity status (3.1%) and grading (3.1%). The frequency of exercise inputs in primary care records vary from as low as 0.4% of patients with documentation of physical activity health promotion inputs to as high as 87.8% of patients with exercise or physical activity status recorded. The majority of included documents (63.6%) were focused on patients with identified chronic conditions. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the structure and purpose of exercise documentation is often unclear or unspecified. Studies that present exercise information from family-physician medical records tend to focus on patients with specific chronic conditions and present little detail about the field from which information was extracted. The review found that the proportion of patients with physical activity or exercise information is often less than half. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7044842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70448422020-03-09 The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review Lindeman, Cliff McCurdy, Ashley Lamboglia, Carminda G Wohlers, Brendan Pham, Anh N Q Sivak, Allison Spence, John C BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: Exercise is an effective modality for the prevention and treatment of chronic conditions and family physicians are the healthcare providers tasked to manage patients’ chronic disease status. However, little is known about the exercise documentation in family-physician records. Therefore, a scoping review was conducted to describe family-physician-recorded exercise-related advice to patients in electronic medical records. DESIGN: Scoping review. SETTING: Primary care clinics. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Medline, SPORTDiscus, Google, Dissertations & Theses Global, OCLC PapersFirst (via First Search) and included references were searched between 1 January 1990 and 10 June 2018. Extracted information included year, geographic origin, data input structure, input frequency and content of exercise inputs in family physicians’ electronic medical records. The primary outcomes are the structure, purpose and frequency of inputs. RESULTS: Of a possible 1758 documents, 83 remained after a title and abstract scan and 22 after a full-text review. These documents included 32 findings of physical activity/exercise medical record documentation: counselling/advising patients (50.0%), status (12.5%), embedded questionnaires (12.5%), status as a risk factor (12.5%), health promotion documentation (6.3%), inactivity status (3.1%) and grading (3.1%). The frequency of exercise inputs in primary care records vary from as low as 0.4% of patients with documentation of physical activity health promotion inputs to as high as 87.8% of patients with exercise or physical activity status recorded. The majority of included documents (63.6%) were focused on patients with identified chronic conditions. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the structure and purpose of exercise documentation is often unclear or unspecified. Studies that present exercise information from family-physician medical records tend to focus on patients with specific chronic conditions and present little detail about the field from which information was extracted. The review found that the proportion of patients with physical activity or exercise information is often less than half. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7044842/ /pubmed/32054628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034542 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Lindeman, Cliff McCurdy, Ashley Lamboglia, Carminda G Wohlers, Brendan Pham, Anh N Q Sivak, Allison Spence, John C The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review |
title | The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review |
title_full | The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review |
title_short | The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review |
title_sort | extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32054628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034542 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lindemancliff theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT mccurdyashley theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT lambogliacarmindag theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT wohlersbrendan theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT phamanhnq theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT sivakallison theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT spencejohnc theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT lindemancliff extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT mccurdyashley extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT lambogliacarmindag extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT wohlersbrendan extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT phamanhnq extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT sivakallison extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview AT spencejohnc extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview |