Cargando…

The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE: Exercise is an effective modality for the prevention and treatment of chronic conditions and family physicians are the healthcare providers tasked to manage patients’ chronic disease status. However, little is known about the exercise documentation in family-physician records. Therefore,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindeman, Cliff, McCurdy, Ashley, Lamboglia, Carminda G, Wohlers, Brendan, Pham, Anh N Q, Sivak, Allison, Spence, John C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32054628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034542
_version_ 1783501651831685120
author Lindeman, Cliff
McCurdy, Ashley
Lamboglia, Carminda G
Wohlers, Brendan
Pham, Anh N Q
Sivak, Allison
Spence, John C
author_facet Lindeman, Cliff
McCurdy, Ashley
Lamboglia, Carminda G
Wohlers, Brendan
Pham, Anh N Q
Sivak, Allison
Spence, John C
author_sort Lindeman, Cliff
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Exercise is an effective modality for the prevention and treatment of chronic conditions and family physicians are the healthcare providers tasked to manage patients’ chronic disease status. However, little is known about the exercise documentation in family-physician records. Therefore, a scoping review was conducted to describe family-physician-recorded exercise-related advice to patients in electronic medical records. DESIGN: Scoping review. SETTING: Primary care clinics. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Medline, SPORTDiscus, Google, Dissertations & Theses Global, OCLC PapersFirst (via First Search) and included references were searched between 1 January 1990 and 10 June 2018. Extracted information included year, geographic origin, data input structure, input frequency and content of exercise inputs in family physicians’ electronic medical records. The primary outcomes are the structure, purpose and frequency of inputs. RESULTS: Of a possible 1758 documents, 83 remained after a title and abstract scan and 22 after a full-text review. These documents included 32 findings of physical activity/exercise medical record documentation: counselling/advising patients (50.0%), status (12.5%), embedded questionnaires (12.5%), status as a risk factor (12.5%), health promotion documentation (6.3%), inactivity status (3.1%) and grading (3.1%). The frequency of exercise inputs in primary care records vary from as low as 0.4% of patients with documentation of physical activity health promotion inputs to as high as 87.8% of patients with exercise or physical activity status recorded. The majority of included documents (63.6%) were focused on patients with identified chronic conditions. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the structure and purpose of exercise documentation is often unclear or unspecified. Studies that present exercise information from family-physician medical records tend to focus on patients with specific chronic conditions and present little detail about the field from which information was extracted. The review found that the proportion of patients with physical activity or exercise information is often less than half.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7044842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70448422020-03-09 The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review Lindeman, Cliff McCurdy, Ashley Lamboglia, Carminda G Wohlers, Brendan Pham, Anh N Q Sivak, Allison Spence, John C BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVE: Exercise is an effective modality for the prevention and treatment of chronic conditions and family physicians are the healthcare providers tasked to manage patients’ chronic disease status. However, little is known about the exercise documentation in family-physician records. Therefore, a scoping review was conducted to describe family-physician-recorded exercise-related advice to patients in electronic medical records. DESIGN: Scoping review. SETTING: Primary care clinics. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Medline, SPORTDiscus, Google, Dissertations & Theses Global, OCLC PapersFirst (via First Search) and included references were searched between 1 January 1990 and 10 June 2018. Extracted information included year, geographic origin, data input structure, input frequency and content of exercise inputs in family physicians’ electronic medical records. The primary outcomes are the structure, purpose and frequency of inputs. RESULTS: Of a possible 1758 documents, 83 remained after a title and abstract scan and 22 after a full-text review. These documents included 32 findings of physical activity/exercise medical record documentation: counselling/advising patients (50.0%), status (12.5%), embedded questionnaires (12.5%), status as a risk factor (12.5%), health promotion documentation (6.3%), inactivity status (3.1%) and grading (3.1%). The frequency of exercise inputs in primary care records vary from as low as 0.4% of patients with documentation of physical activity health promotion inputs to as high as 87.8% of patients with exercise or physical activity status recorded. The majority of included documents (63.6%) were focused on patients with identified chronic conditions. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the structure and purpose of exercise documentation is often unclear or unspecified. Studies that present exercise information from family-physician medical records tend to focus on patients with specific chronic conditions and present little detail about the field from which information was extracted. The review found that the proportion of patients with physical activity or exercise information is often less than half. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7044842/ /pubmed/32054628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034542 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Lindeman, Cliff
McCurdy, Ashley
Lamboglia, Carminda G
Wohlers, Brendan
Pham, Anh N Q
Sivak, Allison
Spence, John C
The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review
title The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review
title_full The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review
title_fullStr The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review
title_short The extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review
title_sort extent to which family physicians record their patients’ exercise in medical records: a scoping review
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32054628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034542
work_keys_str_mv AT lindemancliff theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT mccurdyashley theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT lambogliacarmindag theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT wohlersbrendan theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT phamanhnq theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT sivakallison theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT spencejohnc theextenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT lindemancliff extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT mccurdyashley extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT lambogliacarmindag extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT wohlersbrendan extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT phamanhnq extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT sivakallison extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview
AT spencejohnc extenttowhichfamilyphysiciansrecordtheirpatientsexerciseinmedicalrecordsascopingreview