Cargando…

TULIP: a randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of lateral compression injuries of the pelvis with complete sacral fractures (LC1) in the non-fragility fracture patient—a feasibility study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic fractures are the most common type of pelvic fracture. The majority of LC1 fractures are considered stable. Fractures where a complete sacral fracture is present increases the degree of potential instability and have the potential to displace ove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnfield, Steven, Ingram, Jenny, Halliday, Ruth, Griffin, Xavier, Greenwood, Rosemary, Kandiyali, Rebecca, Thompson, Julian, Glynn, Joel, Beasant, Lucy, McArthur, John, Bates, Peter, Acharya, Mehool
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036588
_version_ 1783501654192029696
author Barnfield, Steven
Ingram, Jenny
Halliday, Ruth
Griffin, Xavier
Greenwood, Rosemary
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Thompson, Julian
Glynn, Joel
Beasant, Lucy
McArthur, John
Bates, Peter
Acharya, Mehool
author_facet Barnfield, Steven
Ingram, Jenny
Halliday, Ruth
Griffin, Xavier
Greenwood, Rosemary
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Thompson, Julian
Glynn, Joel
Beasant, Lucy
McArthur, John
Bates, Peter
Acharya, Mehool
author_sort Barnfield, Steven
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic fractures are the most common type of pelvic fracture. The majority of LC1 fractures are considered stable. Fractures where a complete sacral fracture is present increases the degree of potential instability and have the potential to displace over time. Non-operative management of these unstable fractures may involve restricted weight bearing and significant rehabilitation. Frequent monitoring with X-rays is also necessary for displacement of the fracture. Operative stabilisation of these fractures may be appropriate to prevent displacement of the fracture. This may allow patients to mobilise pain-free, quicker. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a feasibility study to inform the design of a full definitive randomised controlled trial to guide the most appropriate management of these injuries. Participants will be recruited from major trauma centres and randomly allocated to either operative or non-operative management of their injuries. A variety of outcome instruments, measuring health-related quality of life, functional outcome and pain, will be completed at several time points up to 12 months post injury. Qualitative interviews will be undertaken with participants to explore their views of the treatments under investigation and trial processes. Eligibility and recruitment to the study will be analysed to inform the feasibility of a definitive trial. Completion rates of the measurement instruments will be assessed, as well as their sensitivity to change and the presence of floor or ceiling effects in this population, to inform the choice of the primary outcome for a definitive trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the study was given by the South West—Central Bristol NHS Research Ethics Committee on 2nd July 2018 (Ref; 18/SW/0135). The study will be reported in relevant specialist journals and through presentation at specialist conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10649958
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7044852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70448522020-03-09 TULIP: a randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of lateral compression injuries of the pelvis with complete sacral fractures (LC1) in the non-fragility fracture patient—a feasibility study protocol Barnfield, Steven Ingram, Jenny Halliday, Ruth Griffin, Xavier Greenwood, Rosemary Kandiyali, Rebecca Thompson, Julian Glynn, Joel Beasant, Lucy McArthur, John Bates, Peter Acharya, Mehool BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic fractures are the most common type of pelvic fracture. The majority of LC1 fractures are considered stable. Fractures where a complete sacral fracture is present increases the degree of potential instability and have the potential to displace over time. Non-operative management of these unstable fractures may involve restricted weight bearing and significant rehabilitation. Frequent monitoring with X-rays is also necessary for displacement of the fracture. Operative stabilisation of these fractures may be appropriate to prevent displacement of the fracture. This may allow patients to mobilise pain-free, quicker. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a feasibility study to inform the design of a full definitive randomised controlled trial to guide the most appropriate management of these injuries. Participants will be recruited from major trauma centres and randomly allocated to either operative or non-operative management of their injuries. A variety of outcome instruments, measuring health-related quality of life, functional outcome and pain, will be completed at several time points up to 12 months post injury. Qualitative interviews will be undertaken with participants to explore their views of the treatments under investigation and trial processes. Eligibility and recruitment to the study will be analysed to inform the feasibility of a definitive trial. Completion rates of the measurement instruments will be assessed, as well as their sensitivity to change and the presence of floor or ceiling effects in this population, to inform the choice of the primary outcome for a definitive trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the study was given by the South West—Central Bristol NHS Research Ethics Committee on 2nd July 2018 (Ref; 18/SW/0135). The study will be reported in relevant specialist journals and through presentation at specialist conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10649958 BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7044852/ /pubmed/32047021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036588 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Barnfield, Steven
Ingram, Jenny
Halliday, Ruth
Griffin, Xavier
Greenwood, Rosemary
Kandiyali, Rebecca
Thompson, Julian
Glynn, Joel
Beasant, Lucy
McArthur, John
Bates, Peter
Acharya, Mehool
TULIP: a randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of lateral compression injuries of the pelvis with complete sacral fractures (LC1) in the non-fragility fracture patient—a feasibility study protocol
title TULIP: a randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of lateral compression injuries of the pelvis with complete sacral fractures (LC1) in the non-fragility fracture patient—a feasibility study protocol
title_full TULIP: a randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of lateral compression injuries of the pelvis with complete sacral fractures (LC1) in the non-fragility fracture patient—a feasibility study protocol
title_fullStr TULIP: a randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of lateral compression injuries of the pelvis with complete sacral fractures (LC1) in the non-fragility fracture patient—a feasibility study protocol
title_full_unstemmed TULIP: a randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of lateral compression injuries of the pelvis with complete sacral fractures (LC1) in the non-fragility fracture patient—a feasibility study protocol
title_short TULIP: a randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of lateral compression injuries of the pelvis with complete sacral fractures (LC1) in the non-fragility fracture patient—a feasibility study protocol
title_sort tulip: a randomised controlled trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of lateral compression injuries of the pelvis with complete sacral fractures (lc1) in the non-fragility fracture patient—a feasibility study protocol
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036588
work_keys_str_mv AT barnfieldsteven tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT ingramjenny tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT hallidayruth tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT griffinxavier tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT greenwoodrosemary tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT kandiyalirebecca tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT thompsonjulian tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT glynnjoel tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT beasantlucy tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT mcarthurjohn tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT batespeter tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol
AT acharyamehool tuliparandomisedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentoflateralcompressioninjuriesofthepelviswithcompletesacralfractureslc1inthenonfragilityfracturepatientafeasibilitystudyprotocol