Cargando…
The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinimetric validation of the I-DECIDED tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and decision-making. DESIGN AND SETTING: I-DECIDED is an eight-step tool derived from international vascular access guidelines into a structured mnemonic for device assessment and d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035239 |
_version_ | 1783501665717977088 |
---|---|
author | Ray-Barruel, Gillian Cooke, Marie Chopra, Vineet Mitchell, Marion Rickard, Claire M |
author_facet | Ray-Barruel, Gillian Cooke, Marie Chopra, Vineet Mitchell, Marion Rickard, Claire M |
author_sort | Ray-Barruel, Gillian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinimetric validation of the I-DECIDED tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and decision-making. DESIGN AND SETTING: I-DECIDED is an eight-step tool derived from international vascular access guidelines into a structured mnemonic for device assessment and decision-making. The clinimetric evaluation process was conducted in three distinct phases. METHODS: Initial face validity was confirmed with a vascular access working group. Next, content validity testing was conducted via online survey with vascular access experts and clinicians from Australia, the UK, the USA and Canada. Finally, inter-rater reliability was conducted between 34 pairs of assessors for a total of 68 peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) assessments. Assessments were timed to ensure feasibility, and the second rater was blinded to the first’s findings. Content validity index (CVI), mean item-level CVI (I-CVI), internal consistency, mean proportion of agreement, observed and expected inter-rater agreements, and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappas (PABAK) were calculated. Ethics approvals were obtained from university and hospital ethics committees. RESULTS: The I-DECIDED tool demonstrated strong content validity among international vascular access experts (n=7; mean I-CVI=0.91; mean proportion of agreement=0.91) and clinicians (n=11; mean I-CVI=0.93; mean proportion of agreement=0.94), and high inter-rater reliability in seven adult medical-surgical wards of three Australian hospitals. Overall, inter-rater reliability was 87.13%, with PABAK for each principle ranging from 0.5882 (‘patient education’) to 1.0000 (‘document the decision’). Time to complete assessments averaged 2 min, and nurse-reported acceptability was high. CONCLUSION: This is the first comprehensive, evidence-based, valid and reliable PIVC assessment and decision tool. We recommend studies to evaluate the outcome of implementing this tool in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 12617000067370 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7044901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70449012020-03-09 The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation Ray-Barruel, Gillian Cooke, Marie Chopra, Vineet Mitchell, Marion Rickard, Claire M BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinimetric validation of the I-DECIDED tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and decision-making. DESIGN AND SETTING: I-DECIDED is an eight-step tool derived from international vascular access guidelines into a structured mnemonic for device assessment and decision-making. The clinimetric evaluation process was conducted in three distinct phases. METHODS: Initial face validity was confirmed with a vascular access working group. Next, content validity testing was conducted via online survey with vascular access experts and clinicians from Australia, the UK, the USA and Canada. Finally, inter-rater reliability was conducted between 34 pairs of assessors for a total of 68 peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) assessments. Assessments were timed to ensure feasibility, and the second rater was blinded to the first’s findings. Content validity index (CVI), mean item-level CVI (I-CVI), internal consistency, mean proportion of agreement, observed and expected inter-rater agreements, and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappas (PABAK) were calculated. Ethics approvals were obtained from university and hospital ethics committees. RESULTS: The I-DECIDED tool demonstrated strong content validity among international vascular access experts (n=7; mean I-CVI=0.91; mean proportion of agreement=0.91) and clinicians (n=11; mean I-CVI=0.93; mean proportion of agreement=0.94), and high inter-rater reliability in seven adult medical-surgical wards of three Australian hospitals. Overall, inter-rater reliability was 87.13%, with PABAK for each principle ranging from 0.5882 (‘patient education’) to 1.0000 (‘document the decision’). Time to complete assessments averaged 2 min, and nurse-reported acceptability was high. CONCLUSION: This is the first comprehensive, evidence-based, valid and reliable PIVC assessment and decision tool. We recommend studies to evaluate the outcome of implementing this tool in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 12617000067370 BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7044901/ /pubmed/31969371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035239 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Ray-Barruel, Gillian Cooke, Marie Chopra, Vineet Mitchell, Marion Rickard, Claire M The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation |
title | The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation |
title_full | The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation |
title_fullStr | The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation |
title_short | The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation |
title_sort | i-decided clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035239 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raybarruelgillian theidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation AT cookemarie theidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation AT chopravineet theidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation AT mitchellmarion theidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation AT rickardclairem theidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation AT raybarruelgillian idecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation AT cookemarie idecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation AT chopravineet idecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation AT mitchellmarion idecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation AT rickardclairem idecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation |