Cargando…

The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinimetric validation of the I-DECIDED tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and decision-making. DESIGN AND SETTING: I-DECIDED is an eight-step tool derived from international vascular access guidelines into a structured mnemonic for device assessment and d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ray-Barruel, Gillian, Cooke, Marie, Chopra, Vineet, Mitchell, Marion, Rickard, Claire M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035239
_version_ 1783501665717977088
author Ray-Barruel, Gillian
Cooke, Marie
Chopra, Vineet
Mitchell, Marion
Rickard, Claire M
author_facet Ray-Barruel, Gillian
Cooke, Marie
Chopra, Vineet
Mitchell, Marion
Rickard, Claire M
author_sort Ray-Barruel, Gillian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinimetric validation of the I-DECIDED tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and decision-making. DESIGN AND SETTING: I-DECIDED is an eight-step tool derived from international vascular access guidelines into a structured mnemonic for device assessment and decision-making. The clinimetric evaluation process was conducted in three distinct phases. METHODS: Initial face validity was confirmed with a vascular access working group. Next, content validity testing was conducted via online survey with vascular access experts and clinicians from Australia, the UK, the USA and Canada. Finally, inter-rater reliability was conducted between 34 pairs of assessors for a total of 68 peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) assessments. Assessments were timed to ensure feasibility, and the second rater was blinded to the first’s findings. Content validity index (CVI), mean item-level CVI (I-CVI), internal consistency, mean proportion of agreement, observed and expected inter-rater agreements, and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappas (PABAK) were calculated. Ethics approvals were obtained from university and hospital ethics committees. RESULTS: The I-DECIDED tool demonstrated strong content validity among international vascular access experts (n=7; mean I-CVI=0.91; mean proportion of agreement=0.91) and clinicians (n=11; mean I-CVI=0.93; mean proportion of agreement=0.94), and high inter-rater reliability in seven adult medical-surgical wards of three Australian hospitals. Overall, inter-rater reliability was 87.13%, with PABAK for each principle ranging from 0.5882 (‘patient education’) to 1.0000 (‘document the decision’). Time to complete assessments averaged 2 min, and nurse-reported acceptability was high. CONCLUSION: This is the first comprehensive, evidence-based, valid and reliable PIVC assessment and decision tool. We recommend studies to evaluate the outcome of implementing this tool in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 12617000067370
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7044901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70449012020-03-09 The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation Ray-Barruel, Gillian Cooke, Marie Chopra, Vineet Mitchell, Marion Rickard, Claire M BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinimetric validation of the I-DECIDED tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and decision-making. DESIGN AND SETTING: I-DECIDED is an eight-step tool derived from international vascular access guidelines into a structured mnemonic for device assessment and decision-making. The clinimetric evaluation process was conducted in three distinct phases. METHODS: Initial face validity was confirmed with a vascular access working group. Next, content validity testing was conducted via online survey with vascular access experts and clinicians from Australia, the UK, the USA and Canada. Finally, inter-rater reliability was conducted between 34 pairs of assessors for a total of 68 peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) assessments. Assessments were timed to ensure feasibility, and the second rater was blinded to the first’s findings. Content validity index (CVI), mean item-level CVI (I-CVI), internal consistency, mean proportion of agreement, observed and expected inter-rater agreements, and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappas (PABAK) were calculated. Ethics approvals were obtained from university and hospital ethics committees. RESULTS: The I-DECIDED tool demonstrated strong content validity among international vascular access experts (n=7; mean I-CVI=0.91; mean proportion of agreement=0.91) and clinicians (n=11; mean I-CVI=0.93; mean proportion of agreement=0.94), and high inter-rater reliability in seven adult medical-surgical wards of three Australian hospitals. Overall, inter-rater reliability was 87.13%, with PABAK for each principle ranging from 0.5882 (‘patient education’) to 1.0000 (‘document the decision’). Time to complete assessments averaged 2 min, and nurse-reported acceptability was high. CONCLUSION: This is the first comprehensive, evidence-based, valid and reliable PIVC assessment and decision tool. We recommend studies to evaluate the outcome of implementing this tool in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 12617000067370 BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7044901/ /pubmed/31969371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035239 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Ray-Barruel, Gillian
Cooke, Marie
Chopra, Vineet
Mitchell, Marion
Rickard, Claire M
The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation
title The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation
title_full The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation
title_fullStr The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation
title_short The I-DECIDED clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation
title_sort i-decided clinical decision-making tool for peripheral intravenous catheter assessment and safe removal: a clinimetric evaluation
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035239
work_keys_str_mv AT raybarruelgillian theidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation
AT cookemarie theidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation
AT chopravineet theidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation
AT mitchellmarion theidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation
AT rickardclairem theidecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation
AT raybarruelgillian idecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation
AT cookemarie idecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation
AT chopravineet idecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation
AT mitchellmarion idecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation
AT rickardclairem idecidedclinicaldecisionmakingtoolforperipheralintravenouscatheterassessmentandsaferemovalaclinimetricevaluation