Cargando…

Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU): a research protocol

INTRODUCTION: Population ageing and increasing chronic illness burden have sparked interest in innovative care models. While self-management interventions (SMIs) are drawing increasing attention, evidence of their efficacy is mostly based on pairwise meta-analysis, generally derived from randomised...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballester, Marta, Orrego, Carola, Heijmans, Monique, Alonso-Coello, Pablo, Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël, Mavridis, Dimitri, Groene, O, Immonen, Kaisa, Wagner, Cordula, Canelo-Aybar, Carlos, Sunol, Rosa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034680
_version_ 1783501670475366400
author Ballester, Marta
Orrego, Carola
Heijmans, Monique
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël
Mavridis, Dimitri
Groene, O
Immonen, Kaisa
Wagner, Cordula
Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
Sunol, Rosa
author_facet Ballester, Marta
Orrego, Carola
Heijmans, Monique
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël
Mavridis, Dimitri
Groene, O
Immonen, Kaisa
Wagner, Cordula
Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
Sunol, Rosa
author_sort Ballester, Marta
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Population ageing and increasing chronic illness burden have sparked interest in innovative care models. While self-management interventions (SMIs) are drawing increasing attention, evidence of their efficacy is mostly based on pairwise meta-analysis, generally derived from randomised controlled trials comparing interventions versus a control or no intervention. As such, relevant efficacy data for comparisons among different SMIs that can be applied to specific chronic conditions are missing. Therefore, the relevance of the available evidence for decision-making at clinical, organisational and policy levels is limited. AIM: To identify, compare and rank the most effective and cost-effective SMIs for adults with four high-priority chronic conditions: type 2 diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All activities will be conducted as part of the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe(COMPAR-EU, Comparing effectiveness of self-management interventions in 4 high priority chronic diseases inEurope) Project, an European Union (EU)-funded project designed to bridge the gap between current knowledge and practice on SMIs. In the first phase of the project, we will develop and validate a taxonomy, and a Core Outcome Set for each condition. These activities will inform a series of systematic review and network meta-analysis about the effectiveness of SMIs. We will also perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of the most effective SMIs and an evaluation of contextual factors. We will finally develop tailored decision-making tools for the different relevant stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee (University Institute for Primary Care Research - IDIAP Jordi Gol). All patients and other stakeholders will provide informed consent prior to participation. This project has been funded by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 754936). Results will be of interest to relevant stakeholder groups (patients, professionals, managers, policymakers and industry), and will be disseminated in a tailored multi-pronged approach that will include deployment of an interactive platform.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7044921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70449212020-03-09 Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU): a research protocol Ballester, Marta Orrego, Carola Heijmans, Monique Alonso-Coello, Pablo Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël Mavridis, Dimitri Groene, O Immonen, Kaisa Wagner, Cordula Canelo-Aybar, Carlos Sunol, Rosa BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Population ageing and increasing chronic illness burden have sparked interest in innovative care models. While self-management interventions (SMIs) are drawing increasing attention, evidence of their efficacy is mostly based on pairwise meta-analysis, generally derived from randomised controlled trials comparing interventions versus a control or no intervention. As such, relevant efficacy data for comparisons among different SMIs that can be applied to specific chronic conditions are missing. Therefore, the relevance of the available evidence for decision-making at clinical, organisational and policy levels is limited. AIM: To identify, compare and rank the most effective and cost-effective SMIs for adults with four high-priority chronic conditions: type 2 diabetes, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: All activities will be conducted as part of the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe(COMPAR-EU, Comparing effectiveness of self-management interventions in 4 high priority chronic diseases inEurope) Project, an European Union (EU)-funded project designed to bridge the gap between current knowledge and practice on SMIs. In the first phase of the project, we will develop and validate a taxonomy, and a Core Outcome Set for each condition. These activities will inform a series of systematic review and network meta-analysis about the effectiveness of SMIs. We will also perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of the most effective SMIs and an evaluation of contextual factors. We will finally develop tailored decision-making tools for the different relevant stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics committee (University Institute for Primary Care Research - IDIAP Jordi Gol). All patients and other stakeholders will provide informed consent prior to participation. This project has been funded by the EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 754936). Results will be of interest to relevant stakeholder groups (patients, professionals, managers, policymakers and industry), and will be disseminated in a tailored multi-pronged approach that will include deployment of an interactive platform. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7044921/ /pubmed/31959612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034680 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Ballester, Marta
Orrego, Carola
Heijmans, Monique
Alonso-Coello, Pablo
Versteegh, Matthijs Michaël
Mavridis, Dimitri
Groene, O
Immonen, Kaisa
Wagner, Cordula
Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
Sunol, Rosa
Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU): a research protocol
title Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU): a research protocol
title_full Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU): a research protocol
title_fullStr Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU): a research protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU): a research protocol
title_short Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in Europe (COMPAR-EU): a research protocol
title_sort comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions in four high-priority chronic conditions in europe (compar-eu): a research protocol
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034680
work_keys_str_mv AT ballestermarta comparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofselfmanagementinterventionsinfourhighprioritychronicconditionsineuropecompareuaresearchprotocol
AT orregocarola comparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofselfmanagementinterventionsinfourhighprioritychronicconditionsineuropecompareuaresearchprotocol
AT heijmansmonique comparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofselfmanagementinterventionsinfourhighprioritychronicconditionsineuropecompareuaresearchprotocol
AT alonsocoellopablo comparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofselfmanagementinterventionsinfourhighprioritychronicconditionsineuropecompareuaresearchprotocol
AT versteeghmatthijsmichael comparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofselfmanagementinterventionsinfourhighprioritychronicconditionsineuropecompareuaresearchprotocol
AT mavridisdimitri comparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofselfmanagementinterventionsinfourhighprioritychronicconditionsineuropecompareuaresearchprotocol
AT groeneo comparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofselfmanagementinterventionsinfourhighprioritychronicconditionsineuropecompareuaresearchprotocol
AT immonenkaisa comparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofselfmanagementinterventionsinfourhighprioritychronicconditionsineuropecompareuaresearchprotocol
AT wagnercordula comparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofselfmanagementinterventionsinfourhighprioritychronicconditionsineuropecompareuaresearchprotocol
AT caneloaybarcarlos comparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofselfmanagementinterventionsinfourhighprioritychronicconditionsineuropecompareuaresearchprotocol
AT sunolrosa comparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofselfmanagementinterventionsinfourhighprioritychronicconditionsineuropecompareuaresearchprotocol