Cargando…

How large should a cause of death be in order to be included in mortality trend analysis? Deriving a cut-off point from retrospective trend analyses in 21 European countries

OBJECTIVES: The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) distinguishes a large number of causes of death (CODs) that could each be studied individually when monitoring time-trends. We aimed to develop recommendations for using the size of CODs as a criterion for their inclusion in long-term...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitratza, Marianna, Kardaun, Jan W P F, Kunst, Anton E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031702
_version_ 1783501670962954240
author Mitratza, Marianna
Kardaun, Jan W P F
Kunst, Anton E
author_facet Mitratza, Marianna
Kardaun, Jan W P F
Kunst, Anton E
author_sort Mitratza, Marianna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) distinguishes a large number of causes of death (CODs) that could each be studied individually when monitoring time-trends. We aimed to develop recommendations for using the size of CODs as a criterion for their inclusion in long-term trend analysis. DESIGN: Retrospective trend analysis. SETTING: 21 European countries of the WHO Mortality Database. PARTICIPANTS: Deaths from CODs (3-position ICD-10 codes) with ≥5 average annual deaths in a 15-year period between 2000 and 2016. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Fitting polynomial regression models, we examined for each COD in each country whether or not changes over time were statistically significant (with α=0.05) and we assessed correlates of this outcome. Applying receiver operating characteristicROC curve diagnostics, we derived COD size thresholds for selecting CODs for trends analysis. RESULTS: Across all countries, 64.0% of CODs had significant long-term trends. The odds of having a significant trend increased by 18% for every 10% increase of COD size. The independent effect of country was negligible. As compared to circulatory system diseases, the probability of a significant trend was lower for neoplasms and digestive system diseases, and higher for infectious diseases, mental diseases and signs-and-symptoms. We derived a general threshold of around 30 (range: 28–33) annual deaths for inclusion of a COD in trend analysis. The relevant threshold for neoplasms was around 65 (range: 61–70) and for infectious diseases was 20 (range: 19–20). CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood that long-term trends are detected with statistical significance is strongly related to COD size and varies between ICD-10 chapters, but has no independent relation to country. We recommend a general size criterion of 30 annual deaths to select CODs for long-term mortality-trends analysis in European countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7044923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70449232020-03-09 How large should a cause of death be in order to be included in mortality trend analysis? Deriving a cut-off point from retrospective trend analyses in 21 European countries Mitratza, Marianna Kardaun, Jan W P F Kunst, Anton E BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) distinguishes a large number of causes of death (CODs) that could each be studied individually when monitoring time-trends. We aimed to develop recommendations for using the size of CODs as a criterion for their inclusion in long-term trend analysis. DESIGN: Retrospective trend analysis. SETTING: 21 European countries of the WHO Mortality Database. PARTICIPANTS: Deaths from CODs (3-position ICD-10 codes) with ≥5 average annual deaths in a 15-year period between 2000 and 2016. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Fitting polynomial regression models, we examined for each COD in each country whether or not changes over time were statistically significant (with α=0.05) and we assessed correlates of this outcome. Applying receiver operating characteristicROC curve diagnostics, we derived COD size thresholds for selecting CODs for trends analysis. RESULTS: Across all countries, 64.0% of CODs had significant long-term trends. The odds of having a significant trend increased by 18% for every 10% increase of COD size. The independent effect of country was negligible. As compared to circulatory system diseases, the probability of a significant trend was lower for neoplasms and digestive system diseases, and higher for infectious diseases, mental diseases and signs-and-symptoms. We derived a general threshold of around 30 (range: 28–33) annual deaths for inclusion of a COD in trend analysis. The relevant threshold for neoplasms was around 65 (range: 61–70) and for infectious diseases was 20 (range: 19–20). CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood that long-term trends are detected with statistical significance is strongly related to COD size and varies between ICD-10 chapters, but has no independent relation to country. We recommend a general size criterion of 30 annual deaths to select CODs for long-term mortality-trends analysis in European countries. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7044923/ /pubmed/31969361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031702 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Mitratza, Marianna
Kardaun, Jan W P F
Kunst, Anton E
How large should a cause of death be in order to be included in mortality trend analysis? Deriving a cut-off point from retrospective trend analyses in 21 European countries
title How large should a cause of death be in order to be included in mortality trend analysis? Deriving a cut-off point from retrospective trend analyses in 21 European countries
title_full How large should a cause of death be in order to be included in mortality trend analysis? Deriving a cut-off point from retrospective trend analyses in 21 European countries
title_fullStr How large should a cause of death be in order to be included in mortality trend analysis? Deriving a cut-off point from retrospective trend analyses in 21 European countries
title_full_unstemmed How large should a cause of death be in order to be included in mortality trend analysis? Deriving a cut-off point from retrospective trend analyses in 21 European countries
title_short How large should a cause of death be in order to be included in mortality trend analysis? Deriving a cut-off point from retrospective trend analyses in 21 European countries
title_sort how large should a cause of death be in order to be included in mortality trend analysis? deriving a cut-off point from retrospective trend analyses in 21 european countries
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031702
work_keys_str_mv AT mitratzamarianna howlargeshouldacauseofdeathbeinordertobeincludedinmortalitytrendanalysisderivingacutoffpointfromretrospectivetrendanalysesin21europeancountries
AT kardaunjanwpf howlargeshouldacauseofdeathbeinordertobeincludedinmortalitytrendanalysisderivingacutoffpointfromretrospectivetrendanalysesin21europeancountries
AT kunstantone howlargeshouldacauseofdeathbeinordertobeincludedinmortalitytrendanalysisderivingacutoffpointfromretrospectivetrendanalysesin21europeancountries