Cargando…
Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol
INTRODUCTION: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major public health problem affecting more than 2 million people worldwide. It is one of the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases. Haemodialysis (HD) is the most common therapeutic option but is also associated with a risk of cardiovascular...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32029487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033228 |
_version_ | 1783501672596635648 |
---|---|
author | Blankestijn, Peter J Fischer, Kathrin I Barth, Claudia Cromm, Krister Canaud, Bernard Davenport, Andrew Grobbee, Diederick E Hegbrant, Jörgen Roes, Kit C Rose, Matthias Strippoli, Giovanni FM Vernooij, Robin WM Woodward, Mark de Wit, G Ardine Bots, Michiel L |
author_facet | Blankestijn, Peter J Fischer, Kathrin I Barth, Claudia Cromm, Krister Canaud, Bernard Davenport, Andrew Grobbee, Diederick E Hegbrant, Jörgen Roes, Kit C Rose, Matthias Strippoli, Giovanni FM Vernooij, Robin WM Woodward, Mark de Wit, G Ardine Bots, Michiel L |
author_sort | Blankestijn, Peter J |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major public health problem affecting more than 2 million people worldwide. It is one of the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases. Haemodialysis (HD) is the most common therapeutic option but is also associated with a risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and suboptimal quality of life. Over the past decades, haemodiafiltration (HDF) has become available. Although high-dose HDF has shown some promising survival advantage compared to conventional HD, the evidence remains controversial. A Cochrane systematic review found, in low-quality trials, with various convective forms of dialysis, a reduction in cardiovascular, but not all-cause mortality and the effects on non-fatal cardiovascular events and hospitalisation were uncertain. In contrast, an individual patient data analysis suggested that high-dose HDF reduced both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to HD. In view of these discrepant results, a definitive trial is required to determine whether high-dose HDF is preferable to high-flux HD. The comparison of high-dose HDF with high-flux HD (CONVINCE) study will assess the benefits and harms of high-dose HDF versus a conventional high-flux HD in adults with ESKD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This international, prospective, open label, randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 1800 ESKD adults treated with HD in nine European countries. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to high-dose HDF versus continuation of conventional high-flux HD. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 3 years’ follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular events, all-cause and infection-related hospitalisations, patient-reported outcomes (eg, health-related quality of life) and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CONVINCE study will address the question of benefits and harms of high-dose HDF compared to high-flux HD for kidney replacement therapy in patients with ESKD with a focus on survival, patient perspectives and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR 7138). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7044930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70449302020-03-09 Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol Blankestijn, Peter J Fischer, Kathrin I Barth, Claudia Cromm, Krister Canaud, Bernard Davenport, Andrew Grobbee, Diederick E Hegbrant, Jörgen Roes, Kit C Rose, Matthias Strippoli, Giovanni FM Vernooij, Robin WM Woodward, Mark de Wit, G Ardine Bots, Michiel L BMJ Open Renal Medicine INTRODUCTION: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major public health problem affecting more than 2 million people worldwide. It is one of the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases. Haemodialysis (HD) is the most common therapeutic option but is also associated with a risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and suboptimal quality of life. Over the past decades, haemodiafiltration (HDF) has become available. Although high-dose HDF has shown some promising survival advantage compared to conventional HD, the evidence remains controversial. A Cochrane systematic review found, in low-quality trials, with various convective forms of dialysis, a reduction in cardiovascular, but not all-cause mortality and the effects on non-fatal cardiovascular events and hospitalisation were uncertain. In contrast, an individual patient data analysis suggested that high-dose HDF reduced both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to HD. In view of these discrepant results, a definitive trial is required to determine whether high-dose HDF is preferable to high-flux HD. The comparison of high-dose HDF with high-flux HD (CONVINCE) study will assess the benefits and harms of high-dose HDF versus a conventional high-flux HD in adults with ESKD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This international, prospective, open label, randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 1800 ESKD adults treated with HD in nine European countries. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to high-dose HDF versus continuation of conventional high-flux HD. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 3 years’ follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular events, all-cause and infection-related hospitalisations, patient-reported outcomes (eg, health-related quality of life) and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CONVINCE study will address the question of benefits and harms of high-dose HDF compared to high-flux HD for kidney replacement therapy in patients with ESKD with a focus on survival, patient perspectives and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR 7138). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7044930/ /pubmed/32029487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033228 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Renal Medicine Blankestijn, Peter J Fischer, Kathrin I Barth, Claudia Cromm, Krister Canaud, Bernard Davenport, Andrew Grobbee, Diederick E Hegbrant, Jörgen Roes, Kit C Rose, Matthias Strippoli, Giovanni FM Vernooij, Robin WM Woodward, Mark de Wit, G Ardine Bots, Michiel L Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol |
title | Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol |
title_full | Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol |
title_fullStr | Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol |
title_short | Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol |
title_sort | benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (convince) trial protocol |
topic | Renal Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32029487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blankestijnpeterj benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT fischerkathrini benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT barthclaudia benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT crommkrister benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT canaudbernard benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT davenportandrew benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT grobbeediedericke benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT hegbrantjorgen benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT roeskitc benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT rosematthias benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT strippoligiovannifm benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT vernooijrobinwm benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT woodwardmark benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT dewitgardine benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol AT botsmichiell benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol |