Cargando…

Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol

INTRODUCTION: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major public health problem affecting more than 2 million people worldwide. It is one of the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases. Haemodialysis (HD) is the most common therapeutic option but is also associated with a risk of cardiovascular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blankestijn, Peter J, Fischer, Kathrin I, Barth, Claudia, Cromm, Krister, Canaud, Bernard, Davenport, Andrew, Grobbee, Diederick E, Hegbrant, Jörgen, Roes, Kit C, Rose, Matthias, Strippoli, Giovanni FM, Vernooij, Robin WM, Woodward, Mark, de Wit, G Ardine, Bots, Michiel L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32029487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033228
_version_ 1783501672596635648
author Blankestijn, Peter J
Fischer, Kathrin I
Barth, Claudia
Cromm, Krister
Canaud, Bernard
Davenport, Andrew
Grobbee, Diederick E
Hegbrant, Jörgen
Roes, Kit C
Rose, Matthias
Strippoli, Giovanni FM
Vernooij, Robin WM
Woodward, Mark
de Wit, G Ardine
Bots, Michiel L
author_facet Blankestijn, Peter J
Fischer, Kathrin I
Barth, Claudia
Cromm, Krister
Canaud, Bernard
Davenport, Andrew
Grobbee, Diederick E
Hegbrant, Jörgen
Roes, Kit C
Rose, Matthias
Strippoli, Giovanni FM
Vernooij, Robin WM
Woodward, Mark
de Wit, G Ardine
Bots, Michiel L
author_sort Blankestijn, Peter J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major public health problem affecting more than 2 million people worldwide. It is one of the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases. Haemodialysis (HD) is the most common therapeutic option but is also associated with a risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and suboptimal quality of life. Over the past decades, haemodiafiltration (HDF) has become available. Although high-dose HDF has shown some promising survival advantage compared to conventional HD, the evidence remains controversial. A Cochrane systematic review found, in low-quality trials, with various convective forms of dialysis, a reduction in cardiovascular, but not all-cause mortality and the effects on non-fatal cardiovascular events and hospitalisation were uncertain. In contrast, an individual patient data analysis suggested that high-dose HDF reduced both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to HD. In view of these discrepant results, a definitive trial is required to determine whether high-dose HDF is preferable to high-flux HD. The comparison of high-dose HDF with high-flux HD (CONVINCE) study will assess the benefits and harms of high-dose HDF versus a conventional high-flux HD in adults with ESKD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This international, prospective, open label, randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 1800 ESKD adults treated with HD in nine European countries. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to high-dose HDF versus continuation of conventional high-flux HD. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 3 years’ follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular events, all-cause and infection-related hospitalisations, patient-reported outcomes (eg, health-related quality of life) and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CONVINCE study will address the question of benefits and harms of high-dose HDF compared to high-flux HD for kidney replacement therapy in patients with ESKD with a focus on survival, patient perspectives and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR 7138).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7044930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70449302020-03-09 Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol Blankestijn, Peter J Fischer, Kathrin I Barth, Claudia Cromm, Krister Canaud, Bernard Davenport, Andrew Grobbee, Diederick E Hegbrant, Jörgen Roes, Kit C Rose, Matthias Strippoli, Giovanni FM Vernooij, Robin WM Woodward, Mark de Wit, G Ardine Bots, Michiel L BMJ Open Renal Medicine INTRODUCTION: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major public health problem affecting more than 2 million people worldwide. It is one of the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases. Haemodialysis (HD) is the most common therapeutic option but is also associated with a risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and suboptimal quality of life. Over the past decades, haemodiafiltration (HDF) has become available. Although high-dose HDF has shown some promising survival advantage compared to conventional HD, the evidence remains controversial. A Cochrane systematic review found, in low-quality trials, with various convective forms of dialysis, a reduction in cardiovascular, but not all-cause mortality and the effects on non-fatal cardiovascular events and hospitalisation were uncertain. In contrast, an individual patient data analysis suggested that high-dose HDF reduced both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to HD. In view of these discrepant results, a definitive trial is required to determine whether high-dose HDF is preferable to high-flux HD. The comparison of high-dose HDF with high-flux HD (CONVINCE) study will assess the benefits and harms of high-dose HDF versus a conventional high-flux HD in adults with ESKD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This international, prospective, open label, randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 1800 ESKD adults treated with HD in nine European countries. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to high-dose HDF versus continuation of conventional high-flux HD. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 3 years’ follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular events, all-cause and infection-related hospitalisations, patient-reported outcomes (eg, health-related quality of life) and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The CONVINCE study will address the question of benefits and harms of high-dose HDF compared to high-flux HD for kidney replacement therapy in patients with ESKD with a focus on survival, patient perspectives and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR 7138). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7044930/ /pubmed/32029487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033228 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Renal Medicine
Blankestijn, Peter J
Fischer, Kathrin I
Barth, Claudia
Cromm, Krister
Canaud, Bernard
Davenport, Andrew
Grobbee, Diederick E
Hegbrant, Jörgen
Roes, Kit C
Rose, Matthias
Strippoli, Giovanni FM
Vernooij, Robin WM
Woodward, Mark
de Wit, G Ardine
Bots, Michiel L
Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol
title Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol
title_full Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol
title_fullStr Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol
title_short Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol
title_sort benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (convince) trial protocol
topic Renal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32029487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033228
work_keys_str_mv AT blankestijnpeterj benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT fischerkathrini benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT barthclaudia benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT crommkrister benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT canaudbernard benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT davenportandrew benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT grobbeediedericke benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT hegbrantjorgen benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT roeskitc benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT rosematthias benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT strippoligiovannifm benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT vernooijrobinwm benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT woodwardmark benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT dewitgardine benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol
AT botsmichiell benefitsandharmsofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationversushighfluxhaemodialysisthecomparisonofhighdosehaemodiafiltrationwithhighfluxhaemodialysisconvincetrialprotocol