Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of a patient-centred approach to managing multimorbidity in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Patients with multiple chronic health conditions are often managed in a disjointed fashion in primary care, with annual review clinic appointments offered separately for each condition. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of the 3D intervention, which was developed to imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thorn, Joanna, Man, Mei-See, Chaplin, Katherine, Bower, Peter, Brookes, Sara, Gaunt, Daisy, Fitzpatrick, Bridie, Gardner, Caroline, Guthrie, Bruce, Hollinghurst, Sandra, Lee, Victoria, Mercer, Stewart W, Salisbury, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030110
_version_ 1783501681976147968
author Thorn, Joanna
Man, Mei-See
Chaplin, Katherine
Bower, Peter
Brookes, Sara
Gaunt, Daisy
Fitzpatrick, Bridie
Gardner, Caroline
Guthrie, Bruce
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Lee, Victoria
Mercer, Stewart W
Salisbury, Chris
author_facet Thorn, Joanna
Man, Mei-See
Chaplin, Katherine
Bower, Peter
Brookes, Sara
Gaunt, Daisy
Fitzpatrick, Bridie
Gardner, Caroline
Guthrie, Bruce
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Lee, Victoria
Mercer, Stewart W
Salisbury, Chris
author_sort Thorn, Joanna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Patients with multiple chronic health conditions are often managed in a disjointed fashion in primary care, with annual review clinic appointments offered separately for each condition. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of the 3D intervention, which was developed to improve the system of care. DESIGN: Economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial. SETTING: General practices in three centres in England and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 797 adults with three or more chronic conditions were randomised to the 3D intervention, while 749 participants were randomised to receive usual care. INTERVENTION: The 3D approach: comprehensive 6-monthly general practitioner consultations, supported by medication reviews and nurse appointments. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary economic evaluation assessed the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS). Costs were related to changes in a range of secondary outcomes (QALYs accrued by both participants and carers, and deaths) in a cost–consequences analysis from the perspectives of the NHS/PSS, patients/carers and productivity losses. RESULTS: Very small increases were found in both QALYs (adjusted mean difference 0.007 (−0.009 to 0.023)) and costs (adjusted mean difference £126 (£−739 to £991)) in the intervention arm compared with usual care after 15 months. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £18 499, with a 50.8% chance of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY (55.8% at £30 000 per QALY). CONCLUSIONS: The small differences in costs and outcomes were consistent with chance, and the uncertainty was substantial; therefore, the evidence for the cost-effectiveness of the 3D approach from the NHS/PSS perspective should be considered equivocal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISCRTN06180958
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7044971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70449712020-03-09 Cost-effectiveness of a patient-centred approach to managing multimorbidity in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial Thorn, Joanna Man, Mei-See Chaplin, Katherine Bower, Peter Brookes, Sara Gaunt, Daisy Fitzpatrick, Bridie Gardner, Caroline Guthrie, Bruce Hollinghurst, Sandra Lee, Victoria Mercer, Stewart W Salisbury, Chris BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: Patients with multiple chronic health conditions are often managed in a disjointed fashion in primary care, with annual review clinic appointments offered separately for each condition. This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of the 3D intervention, which was developed to improve the system of care. DESIGN: Economic evaluation conducted alongside a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial. SETTING: General practices in three centres in England and Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 797 adults with three or more chronic conditions were randomised to the 3D intervention, while 749 participants were randomised to receive usual care. INTERVENTION: The 3D approach: comprehensive 6-monthly general practitioner consultations, supported by medication reviews and nurse appointments. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary economic evaluation assessed the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services (PSS). Costs were related to changes in a range of secondary outcomes (QALYs accrued by both participants and carers, and deaths) in a cost–consequences analysis from the perspectives of the NHS/PSS, patients/carers and productivity losses. RESULTS: Very small increases were found in both QALYs (adjusted mean difference 0.007 (−0.009 to 0.023)) and costs (adjusted mean difference £126 (£−739 to £991)) in the intervention arm compared with usual care after 15 months. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £18 499, with a 50.8% chance of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY (55.8% at £30 000 per QALY). CONCLUSIONS: The small differences in costs and outcomes were consistent with chance, and the uncertainty was substantial; therefore, the evidence for the cost-effectiveness of the 3D approach from the NHS/PSS perspective should be considered equivocal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISCRTN06180958 BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7044971/ /pubmed/31959601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030110 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Thorn, Joanna
Man, Mei-See
Chaplin, Katherine
Bower, Peter
Brookes, Sara
Gaunt, Daisy
Fitzpatrick, Bridie
Gardner, Caroline
Guthrie, Bruce
Hollinghurst, Sandra
Lee, Victoria
Mercer, Stewart W
Salisbury, Chris
Cost-effectiveness of a patient-centred approach to managing multimorbidity in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
title Cost-effectiveness of a patient-centred approach to managing multimorbidity in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Cost-effectiveness of a patient-centred approach to managing multimorbidity in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of a patient-centred approach to managing multimorbidity in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of a patient-centred approach to managing multimorbidity in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Cost-effectiveness of a patient-centred approach to managing multimorbidity in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort cost-effectiveness of a patient-centred approach to managing multimorbidity in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31959601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030110
work_keys_str_mv AT thornjoanna costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT manmeisee costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chaplinkatherine costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bowerpeter costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brookessara costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gauntdaisy costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fitzpatrickbridie costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gardnercaroline costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT guthriebruce costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hollinghurstsandra costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leevictoria costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mercerstewartw costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT salisburychris costeffectivenessofapatientcentredapproachtomanagingmultimorbidityinprimarycareapragmaticclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial