Cargando…
Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis
OBJECTIVES: To establish the rates of publication and reporting of results for interventional clinical trials across Polish academic medical centres (AMCs) completed between 2009 and 2013. We aim also to compare the publication and reporting success between adult and paediatric trials. DESIGN: Cross...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31974090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034666 |
_version_ | 1783501686037282816 |
---|---|
author | Strzebonska, Karolina Wasylewski, Mateusz T Zaborowska, Lucja Riedel, Nico Wieschowski, Susanne Strech, Daniel Waligora, Marcin |
author_facet | Strzebonska, Karolina Wasylewski, Mateusz T Zaborowska, Lucja Riedel, Nico Wieschowski, Susanne Strech, Daniel Waligora, Marcin |
author_sort | Strzebonska, Karolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To establish the rates of publication and reporting of results for interventional clinical trials across Polish academic medical centres (AMCs) completed between 2009 and 2013. We aim also to compare the publication and reporting success between adult and paediatric trials. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: AMCs in Poland. PARTICIPANTS: AMCs with interventional trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Results reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov and publishing via journal publication. RESULTS: We identified 305 interventional clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, completed between 2009 and 2013 and affiliated with at least one AMC. Overall, 243 of the 305 trials (79.7%) had been published as articles or posted their summary results on ClinicalTrials.gov. Results were posted within a year of study completion and/or published within 2 years of study completion for 131 trials (43.0%). Dissemination by both posting and publishing results in a timely manner was achieved by four trials (1.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our cross-sectional analysis revealed that Polish AMCs fail to meet the expectation for timely disseminating the findings of all interventional clinical trials. Delayed dissemination and non-dissemination of trial results negatively affects decisions in healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7044990 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70449902020-03-09 Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis Strzebonska, Karolina Wasylewski, Mateusz T Zaborowska, Lucja Riedel, Nico Wieschowski, Susanne Strech, Daniel Waligora, Marcin BMJ Open Ethics OBJECTIVES: To establish the rates of publication and reporting of results for interventional clinical trials across Polish academic medical centres (AMCs) completed between 2009 and 2013. We aim also to compare the publication and reporting success between adult and paediatric trials. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: AMCs in Poland. PARTICIPANTS: AMCs with interventional trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Results reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov and publishing via journal publication. RESULTS: We identified 305 interventional clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, completed between 2009 and 2013 and affiliated with at least one AMC. Overall, 243 of the 305 trials (79.7%) had been published as articles or posted their summary results on ClinicalTrials.gov. Results were posted within a year of study completion and/or published within 2 years of study completion for 131 trials (43.0%). Dissemination by both posting and publishing results in a timely manner was achieved by four trials (1.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our cross-sectional analysis revealed that Polish AMCs fail to meet the expectation for timely disseminating the findings of all interventional clinical trials. Delayed dissemination and non-dissemination of trial results negatively affects decisions in healthcare. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7044990/ /pubmed/31974090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034666 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Ethics Strzebonska, Karolina Wasylewski, Mateusz T Zaborowska, Lucja Riedel, Nico Wieschowski, Susanne Strech, Daniel Waligora, Marcin Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis |
title | Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_full | Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_fullStr | Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_short | Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis |
title_sort | results dissemination of registered clinical trials across polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis |
topic | Ethics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7044990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31974090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034666 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strzebonskakarolina resultsdisseminationofregisteredclinicaltrialsacrosspolishacademicinstitutionsacrosssectionalanalysis AT wasylewskimateuszt resultsdisseminationofregisteredclinicaltrialsacrosspolishacademicinstitutionsacrosssectionalanalysis AT zaborowskalucja resultsdisseminationofregisteredclinicaltrialsacrosspolishacademicinstitutionsacrosssectionalanalysis AT riedelnico resultsdisseminationofregisteredclinicaltrialsacrosspolishacademicinstitutionsacrosssectionalanalysis AT wieschowskisusanne resultsdisseminationofregisteredclinicaltrialsacrosspolishacademicinstitutionsacrosssectionalanalysis AT strechdaniel resultsdisseminationofregisteredclinicaltrialsacrosspolishacademicinstitutionsacrosssectionalanalysis AT waligoramarcin resultsdisseminationofregisteredclinicaltrialsacrosspolishacademicinstitutionsacrosssectionalanalysis |