Cargando…
Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design
OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the iLead intervention and to investigate whether or not transfer of training can be supported by contextualising the intervention (recruiting all managers from one branch of the organisation while focusing on one implementation case, as well as traini...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31932392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033227 |
_version_ | 1783501689756581888 |
---|---|
author | Richter, Anne Lornudd, Caroline von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica Lundmark, Robert Mosson, Rebecca Eskner Skoger, Ulrika Hirvikoski, Tatja Hasson, Henna |
author_facet | Richter, Anne Lornudd, Caroline von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica Lundmark, Robert Mosson, Rebecca Eskner Skoger, Ulrika Hirvikoski, Tatja Hasson, Henna |
author_sort | Richter, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the iLead intervention and to investigate whether or not transfer of training can be supported by contextualising the intervention (recruiting all managers from one branch of the organisation while focusing on one implementation case, as well as training senior management). DESIGN: A pre-evaluation–postevaluation design was applied using mixed methods with process and effect surveys and interviews to measure the effects on three levels. SETTING: Healthcare managers from Stockholm’s regional healthcare organisation were invited to the training. PARTICIPANTS: 52 managers participated in the iLead intervention. Group 1 consisted of 21 managers from different organisations and with different implementation cases. Group 2, representing the contextualised group, consisted of 31 managers from the same organisation, working on the same implementation case, where senior management also received training. INTERVENTION: iLead is an intervention where healthcare managers are trained in implementation leadership based on the full-range leadership model. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Reactions, knowledge and implementation leadership are measured. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative analyses indicate that iLead was perceived to be of high quality and capable of increasing participants’ knowledge. Mixed effects were found regarding changes in behaviours. The contextualisation did not have a boosting effect on behaviour change. Hence, group 2 did not increase its active implementation leadership in comparison with group 1. CONCLUSIONS: iLead introduces a new approach to how implementation leadership can be trained when knowledge of effective leadership for implementations is combined with findings on the importance of environmental factors for the transfer of training. Even though managers reported general positive effects, transfer was not facilitated through the contextualisation of the intervention. There is a need to further develop approaches to help participants subsequently apply the learnt skills in their work environment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7045007 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70450072020-03-09 Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design Richter, Anne Lornudd, Caroline von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica Lundmark, Robert Mosson, Rebecca Eskner Skoger, Ulrika Hirvikoski, Tatja Hasson, Henna BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the iLead intervention and to investigate whether or not transfer of training can be supported by contextualising the intervention (recruiting all managers from one branch of the organisation while focusing on one implementation case, as well as training senior management). DESIGN: A pre-evaluation–postevaluation design was applied using mixed methods with process and effect surveys and interviews to measure the effects on three levels. SETTING: Healthcare managers from Stockholm’s regional healthcare organisation were invited to the training. PARTICIPANTS: 52 managers participated in the iLead intervention. Group 1 consisted of 21 managers from different organisations and with different implementation cases. Group 2, representing the contextualised group, consisted of 31 managers from the same organisation, working on the same implementation case, where senior management also received training. INTERVENTION: iLead is an intervention where healthcare managers are trained in implementation leadership based on the full-range leadership model. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Reactions, knowledge and implementation leadership are measured. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative analyses indicate that iLead was perceived to be of high quality and capable of increasing participants’ knowledge. Mixed effects were found regarding changes in behaviours. The contextualisation did not have a boosting effect on behaviour change. Hence, group 2 did not increase its active implementation leadership in comparison with group 1. CONCLUSIONS: iLead introduces a new approach to how implementation leadership can be trained when knowledge of effective leadership for implementations is combined with findings on the importance of environmental factors for the transfer of training. Even though managers reported general positive effects, transfer was not facilitated through the contextualisation of the intervention. There is a need to further develop approaches to help participants subsequently apply the learnt skills in their work environment. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7045007/ /pubmed/31932392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033227 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Richter, Anne Lornudd, Caroline von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica Lundmark, Robert Mosson, Rebecca Eskner Skoger, Ulrika Hirvikoski, Tatja Hasson, Henna Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design |
title | Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design |
title_full | Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design |
title_short | Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design |
title_sort | evaluation of ilead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31932392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richteranne evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign AT lornuddcaroline evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign AT vonthieleschwarzulrica evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign AT lundmarkrobert evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign AT mossonrebecca evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign AT esknerskogerulrika evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign AT hirvikoskitatja evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign AT hassonhenna evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign |