Cargando…

Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the iLead intervention and to investigate whether or not transfer of training can be supported by contextualising the intervention (recruiting all managers from one branch of the organisation while focusing on one implementation case, as well as traini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richter, Anne, Lornudd, Caroline, von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica, Lundmark, Robert, Mosson, Rebecca, Eskner Skoger, Ulrika, Hirvikoski, Tatja, Hasson, Henna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31932392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033227
_version_ 1783501689756581888
author Richter, Anne
Lornudd, Caroline
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Lundmark, Robert
Mosson, Rebecca
Eskner Skoger, Ulrika
Hirvikoski, Tatja
Hasson, Henna
author_facet Richter, Anne
Lornudd, Caroline
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Lundmark, Robert
Mosson, Rebecca
Eskner Skoger, Ulrika
Hirvikoski, Tatja
Hasson, Henna
author_sort Richter, Anne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the iLead intervention and to investigate whether or not transfer of training can be supported by contextualising the intervention (recruiting all managers from one branch of the organisation while focusing on one implementation case, as well as training senior management). DESIGN: A pre-evaluation–postevaluation design was applied using mixed methods with process and effect surveys and interviews to measure the effects on three levels. SETTING: Healthcare managers from Stockholm’s regional healthcare organisation were invited to the training. PARTICIPANTS: 52 managers participated in the iLead intervention. Group 1 consisted of 21 managers from different organisations and with different implementation cases. Group 2, representing the contextualised group, consisted of 31 managers from the same organisation, working on the same implementation case, where senior management also received training. INTERVENTION: iLead is an intervention where healthcare managers are trained in implementation leadership based on the full-range leadership model. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Reactions, knowledge and implementation leadership are measured. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative analyses indicate that iLead was perceived to be of high quality and capable of increasing participants’ knowledge. Mixed effects were found regarding changes in behaviours. The contextualisation did not have a boosting effect on behaviour change. Hence, group 2 did not increase its active implementation leadership in comparison with group 1. CONCLUSIONS: iLead introduces a new approach to how implementation leadership can be trained when knowledge of effective leadership for implementations is combined with findings on the importance of environmental factors for the transfer of training. Even though managers reported general positive effects, transfer was not facilitated through the contextualisation of the intervention. There is a need to further develop approaches to help participants subsequently apply the learnt skills in their work environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70450072020-03-09 Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design Richter, Anne Lornudd, Caroline von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica Lundmark, Robert Mosson, Rebecca Eskner Skoger, Ulrika Hirvikoski, Tatja Hasson, Henna BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the iLead intervention and to investigate whether or not transfer of training can be supported by contextualising the intervention (recruiting all managers from one branch of the organisation while focusing on one implementation case, as well as training senior management). DESIGN: A pre-evaluation–postevaluation design was applied using mixed methods with process and effect surveys and interviews to measure the effects on three levels. SETTING: Healthcare managers from Stockholm’s regional healthcare organisation were invited to the training. PARTICIPANTS: 52 managers participated in the iLead intervention. Group 1 consisted of 21 managers from different organisations and with different implementation cases. Group 2, representing the contextualised group, consisted of 31 managers from the same organisation, working on the same implementation case, where senior management also received training. INTERVENTION: iLead is an intervention where healthcare managers are trained in implementation leadership based on the full-range leadership model. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Reactions, knowledge and implementation leadership are measured. RESULTS: Quantitative and qualitative analyses indicate that iLead was perceived to be of high quality and capable of increasing participants’ knowledge. Mixed effects were found regarding changes in behaviours. The contextualisation did not have a boosting effect on behaviour change. Hence, group 2 did not increase its active implementation leadership in comparison with group 1. CONCLUSIONS: iLead introduces a new approach to how implementation leadership can be trained when knowledge of effective leadership for implementations is combined with findings on the importance of environmental factors for the transfer of training. Even though managers reported general positive effects, transfer was not facilitated through the contextualisation of the intervention. There is a need to further develop approaches to help participants subsequently apply the learnt skills in their work environment. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7045007/ /pubmed/31932392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033227 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Richter, Anne
Lornudd, Caroline
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Lundmark, Robert
Mosson, Rebecca
Eskner Skoger, Ulrika
Hirvikoski, Tatja
Hasson, Henna
Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design
title Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design
title_full Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design
title_fullStr Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design
title_short Evaluation of iLead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design
title_sort evaluation of ilead, a generic implementation leadership intervention: mixed-method preintervention–postintervention design
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31932392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033227
work_keys_str_mv AT richteranne evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign
AT lornuddcaroline evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign
AT vonthieleschwarzulrica evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign
AT lundmarkrobert evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign
AT mossonrebecca evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign
AT esknerskogerulrika evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign
AT hirvikoskitatja evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign
AT hassonhenna evaluationofileadagenericimplementationleadershipinterventionmixedmethodpreinterventionpostinterventiondesign