Cargando…
Point-of-care blood tests during home visits by out-of-hours primary care clinicians; a mixed methods evaluation of a service improvement
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate test usage and patient and clinician experience following the introduction of point-of-care (POC) blood tests into a primary care out-of-hours service. DESIGN: A mixed methods service evaluation comprising quantitative records of the clinical contexts of tests taken...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033428 |
_version_ | 1783501692597174272 |
---|---|
author | Hayward, Gail Dixon, Sharon Garland, Sophie Glogowska, Margaret Hunt, Helen Lasserson, Daniel |
author_facet | Hayward, Gail Dixon, Sharon Garland, Sophie Glogowska, Margaret Hunt, Helen Lasserson, Daniel |
author_sort | Hayward, Gail |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate test usage and patient and clinician experience following the introduction of point-of-care (POC) blood tests into a primary care out-of-hours service. DESIGN: A mixed methods service evaluation comprising quantitative records of the clinical contexts of tests taken and qualitative interviews with clinicians. Research permissions and governance were obtained for patient interviews. SETTING: Out-of-hours primary care. PARTICIPANTS: All patients requiring home visits from the service during the implementation period. INTERVENTIONS: The i-STAT POC blood test platform was introduced to two bases providing home visits for a period of 8 months. Venous blood samples were used and two cartridges were available. The CHEM8 cartridge measures sodium, potassium, chloride, total carbon dioxide (TCO2), anion gap, ionised calcium, glucose, urea, creatinine, haematocrit and haemoglobin. The CG4 cartridge measures lactate, pH, PaO2 and PCO2, TCO2, bicarbonate, base excess and oxygen saturation. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of home visits where tests were taken, the clinical contexts of those tests, the extent to which clinicians felt the tests had influenced their decisions, time taken to perform the test and problems encountered. Clinician and patient experiences of using POC tests. RESULTS: i-STAT POC tests were infrequently used, with successful tests taken at just 47 contacts over 8 months of implementation. The patients interviewed felt that testing had been beneficial for their care. Clinician interviews suggested barriers to POC tests, including practical challenges, concerns about time, doubt over whether they would improve clinical decision making and concern about increased medicolegal risk. Suggestions for improving adoption included sharing learning, adopting a whole team approach and developing protocols for usage. CONCLUSIONS: POC tests were not successfully adopted by an out-of-hours home visiting service in Oxfordshire. While some clinicians felt they could not add value, in other cases they resulted in improved patient experience. Adoption could be promoted by improving technical, team and education factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7045021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70450212020-03-09 Point-of-care blood tests during home visits by out-of-hours primary care clinicians; a mixed methods evaluation of a service improvement Hayward, Gail Dixon, Sharon Garland, Sophie Glogowska, Margaret Hunt, Helen Lasserson, Daniel BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate test usage and patient and clinician experience following the introduction of point-of-care (POC) blood tests into a primary care out-of-hours service. DESIGN: A mixed methods service evaluation comprising quantitative records of the clinical contexts of tests taken and qualitative interviews with clinicians. Research permissions and governance were obtained for patient interviews. SETTING: Out-of-hours primary care. PARTICIPANTS: All patients requiring home visits from the service during the implementation period. INTERVENTIONS: The i-STAT POC blood test platform was introduced to two bases providing home visits for a period of 8 months. Venous blood samples were used and two cartridges were available. The CHEM8 cartridge measures sodium, potassium, chloride, total carbon dioxide (TCO2), anion gap, ionised calcium, glucose, urea, creatinine, haematocrit and haemoglobin. The CG4 cartridge measures lactate, pH, PaO2 and PCO2, TCO2, bicarbonate, base excess and oxygen saturation. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of home visits where tests were taken, the clinical contexts of those tests, the extent to which clinicians felt the tests had influenced their decisions, time taken to perform the test and problems encountered. Clinician and patient experiences of using POC tests. RESULTS: i-STAT POC tests were infrequently used, with successful tests taken at just 47 contacts over 8 months of implementation. The patients interviewed felt that testing had been beneficial for their care. Clinician interviews suggested barriers to POC tests, including practical challenges, concerns about time, doubt over whether they would improve clinical decision making and concern about increased medicolegal risk. Suggestions for improving adoption included sharing learning, adopting a whole team approach and developing protocols for usage. CONCLUSIONS: POC tests were not successfully adopted by an out-of-hours home visiting service in Oxfordshire. While some clinicians felt they could not add value, in other cases they resulted in improved patient experience. Adoption could be promoted by improving technical, team and education factors. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7045021/ /pubmed/31948989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033428 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Hayward, Gail Dixon, Sharon Garland, Sophie Glogowska, Margaret Hunt, Helen Lasserson, Daniel Point-of-care blood tests during home visits by out-of-hours primary care clinicians; a mixed methods evaluation of a service improvement |
title | Point-of-care blood tests during home visits by out-of-hours primary care clinicians; a mixed methods evaluation of a service improvement |
title_full | Point-of-care blood tests during home visits by out-of-hours primary care clinicians; a mixed methods evaluation of a service improvement |
title_fullStr | Point-of-care blood tests during home visits by out-of-hours primary care clinicians; a mixed methods evaluation of a service improvement |
title_full_unstemmed | Point-of-care blood tests during home visits by out-of-hours primary care clinicians; a mixed methods evaluation of a service improvement |
title_short | Point-of-care blood tests during home visits by out-of-hours primary care clinicians; a mixed methods evaluation of a service improvement |
title_sort | point-of-care blood tests during home visits by out-of-hours primary care clinicians; a mixed methods evaluation of a service improvement |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033428 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haywardgail pointofcarebloodtestsduringhomevisitsbyoutofhoursprimarycarecliniciansamixedmethodsevaluationofaserviceimprovement AT dixonsharon pointofcarebloodtestsduringhomevisitsbyoutofhoursprimarycarecliniciansamixedmethodsevaluationofaserviceimprovement AT garlandsophie pointofcarebloodtestsduringhomevisitsbyoutofhoursprimarycarecliniciansamixedmethodsevaluationofaserviceimprovement AT glogowskamargaret pointofcarebloodtestsduringhomevisitsbyoutofhoursprimarycarecliniciansamixedmethodsevaluationofaserviceimprovement AT hunthelen pointofcarebloodtestsduringhomevisitsbyoutofhoursprimarycarecliniciansamixedmethodsevaluationofaserviceimprovement AT lassersondaniel pointofcarebloodtestsduringhomevisitsbyoutofhoursprimarycarecliniciansamixedmethodsevaluationofaserviceimprovement |