Cargando…

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety, efficiency and preferred indication for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) compared with conventional laparoscopic (CL) surgery for benign ovarian masses. DESIGN: A systemic review and cumulative meta-analysis were performed in line with the crite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Yun, Liu, Mubiao, Ye, Haiyan, He, Jianhui, Chen, Jianguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032331
_version_ 1783501696105709568
author Lin, Yun
Liu, Mubiao
Ye, Haiyan
He, Jianhui
Chen, Jianguo
author_facet Lin, Yun
Liu, Mubiao
Ye, Haiyan
He, Jianhui
Chen, Jianguo
author_sort Lin, Yun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety, efficiency and preferred indication for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) compared with conventional laparoscopic (CL) surgery for benign ovarian masses. DESIGN: A systemic review and cumulative meta-analysis were performed in line with the criteria of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation: levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. DATA SOURCES: We comprehensively searched the electronic databases including PubMed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library in November 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies published in recent 10 years, which investigated the performance of LESS versus CL in patients at all ages with benign ovarian masses. RESULTS: Four RCTs and nine retrospective studies published in recent decade including 1542 cases (744 cases for LESS and 798 cases for CL) were identified. Perioperative complication was consisted of intraoperative and postoperative complications, including ileus, wound infection or dehiscence and incisional hernia. Although LESS has less postoperative analgesic consumption (46.78% and 79.25%; OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.74, p<0.001) and shorter hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD): −0.24 days; 95% CI: −0.35 to −0.14; p<0.001), CL has less perioperative complications (6.59% and 2.85%; OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.05 to 4.11, p=0.04) and shorter operative time (WMD: 3.43 min; 95% CI: −0.03 to 6.88; p=0.05). Body mass index, history of previous abdominal surgery, size of adnexal mass, estimated blood loss and postoperative pain scores did not differ significantly between two techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The indications of LESS for benign ovarian masses are similar to CL and it has better postoperative recovery. However, with less perioperative complications, CL surgery is safer than LESS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70450362020-03-09 Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lin, Yun Liu, Mubiao Ye, Haiyan He, Jianhui Chen, Jianguo BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety, efficiency and preferred indication for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) compared with conventional laparoscopic (CL) surgery for benign ovarian masses. DESIGN: A systemic review and cumulative meta-analysis were performed in line with the criteria of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation: levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. DATA SOURCES: We comprehensively searched the electronic databases including PubMed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library in November 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies published in recent 10 years, which investigated the performance of LESS versus CL in patients at all ages with benign ovarian masses. RESULTS: Four RCTs and nine retrospective studies published in recent decade including 1542 cases (744 cases for LESS and 798 cases for CL) were identified. Perioperative complication was consisted of intraoperative and postoperative complications, including ileus, wound infection or dehiscence and incisional hernia. Although LESS has less postoperative analgesic consumption (46.78% and 79.25%; OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.74, p<0.001) and shorter hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD): −0.24 days; 95% CI: −0.35 to −0.14; p<0.001), CL has less perioperative complications (6.59% and 2.85%; OR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.05 to 4.11, p=0.04) and shorter operative time (WMD: 3.43 min; 95% CI: −0.03 to 6.88; p=0.05). Body mass index, history of previous abdominal surgery, size of adnexal mass, estimated blood loss and postoperative pain scores did not differ significantly between two techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The indications of LESS for benign ovarian masses are similar to CL and it has better postoperative recovery. However, with less perioperative complications, CL surgery is safer than LESS. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7045036/ /pubmed/32066600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032331 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Lin, Yun
Liu, Mubiao
Ye, Haiyan
He, Jianhui
Chen, Jianguo
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort laparoendoscopic single-site surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032331
work_keys_str_mv AT linyun laparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerycomparedwithconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignovarianmassesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liumubiao laparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerycomparedwithconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignovarianmassesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yehaiyan laparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerycomparedwithconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignovarianmassesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hejianhui laparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerycomparedwithconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignovarianmassesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenjianguo laparoendoscopicsinglesitesurgerycomparedwithconventionallaparoscopicsurgeryforbenignovarianmassesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis