Cargando…

Long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: A randomised phase II trial (ISRCTN53643604)

BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of men with poor prognosis, non-seminoma germ cell tumours (GCTs) die with standard BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) chemotherapy. An intensive regimen, CBOP/BEP (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/BEP), met response targets in a randomised, phase II tria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cafferty, Fay H., White, Jeff D., Shamash, Jonathan, Hennig, Ivo, Stenning, Sally P., Huddart, Robert A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32007714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.028
_version_ 1783501706337714176
author Cafferty, Fay H.
White, Jeff D.
Shamash, Jonathan
Hennig, Ivo
Stenning, Sally P.
Huddart, Robert A.
author_facet Cafferty, Fay H.
White, Jeff D.
Shamash, Jonathan
Hennig, Ivo
Stenning, Sally P.
Huddart, Robert A.
author_sort Cafferty, Fay H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of men with poor prognosis, non-seminoma germ cell tumours (GCTs) die with standard BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) chemotherapy. An intensive regimen, CBOP/BEP (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/BEP), met response targets in a randomised, phase II trial (74% complete response or partial response marker negative, 90% confidence interval (CI) 61%–85%). AIM: To assess long-term outcomes and late toxicity associated with CBOP/BEP. METHODS: Patients with poor prognosis extracranial GCT were randomised to 4xBEP or CBOP/BEP (2xCBOP, 2xBO, 3xBEP with 15,000iu of bleomycin). Low-dose, stabilising chemotherapy before entry was permitted. Response rates (primary outcome) were reported previously. Here, we report secondary outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and late toxicity. Prognostic factors and the impact of marker decline are assessed in exploratory analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients (43 CBOP/BEP) were randomised. After median 63 months follow-up, 3-year PFS is 55.7% (95% CI: 39.7%, 69.0%) for CBOP/BEP and 38.7% (95% CI: 24.7%, 52.4%) for BEP (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59 (0.33, 1.06), p = 0.079). Three-year OS is 65.0% (48.8%, 77.2%) and 58.5% (43.0%, 71.2%), respectively (HR: 0.79 (0.41, 1.52), p = 0.49). Twelve-month toxicity was affected by subsequent treatments, with no clear differences between arms. Stabilising chemotherapy was associated with poorer PFS (HR: 2.09 (1.14, 3.81), p = 0.017), whereas unfavourable marker decline, in 60 (70%) patients, was not. CONCLUSION: Although not powered for PFS, results for CBOP/BEP are promising. Impact on OS was less clear (and will be affected by subsequent therapy). Further study in an international phase III trial is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 53643604.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Science Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70450842020-03-05 Long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: A randomised phase II trial (ISRCTN53643604) Cafferty, Fay H. White, Jeff D. Shamash, Jonathan Hennig, Ivo Stenning, Sally P. Huddart, Robert A. Eur J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of men with poor prognosis, non-seminoma germ cell tumours (GCTs) die with standard BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) chemotherapy. An intensive regimen, CBOP/BEP (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/BEP), met response targets in a randomised, phase II trial (74% complete response or partial response marker negative, 90% confidence interval (CI) 61%–85%). AIM: To assess long-term outcomes and late toxicity associated with CBOP/BEP. METHODS: Patients with poor prognosis extracranial GCT were randomised to 4xBEP or CBOP/BEP (2xCBOP, 2xBO, 3xBEP with 15,000iu of bleomycin). Low-dose, stabilising chemotherapy before entry was permitted. Response rates (primary outcome) were reported previously. Here, we report secondary outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and late toxicity. Prognostic factors and the impact of marker decline are assessed in exploratory analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients (43 CBOP/BEP) were randomised. After median 63 months follow-up, 3-year PFS is 55.7% (95% CI: 39.7%, 69.0%) for CBOP/BEP and 38.7% (95% CI: 24.7%, 52.4%) for BEP (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59 (0.33, 1.06), p = 0.079). Three-year OS is 65.0% (48.8%, 77.2%) and 58.5% (43.0%, 71.2%), respectively (HR: 0.79 (0.41, 1.52), p = 0.49). Twelve-month toxicity was affected by subsequent treatments, with no clear differences between arms. Stabilising chemotherapy was associated with poorer PFS (HR: 2.09 (1.14, 3.81), p = 0.017), whereas unfavourable marker decline, in 60 (70%) patients, was not. CONCLUSION: Although not powered for PFS, results for CBOP/BEP are promising. Impact on OS was less clear (and will be affected by subsequent therapy). Further study in an international phase III trial is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 53643604. Elsevier Science Ltd 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7045084/ /pubmed/32007714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.028 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cafferty, Fay H.
White, Jeff D.
Shamash, Jonathan
Hennig, Ivo
Stenning, Sally P.
Huddart, Robert A.
Long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: A randomised phase II trial (ISRCTN53643604)
title Long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: A randomised phase II trial (ISRCTN53643604)
title_full Long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: A randomised phase II trial (ISRCTN53643604)
title_fullStr Long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: A randomised phase II trial (ISRCTN53643604)
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: A randomised phase II trial (ISRCTN53643604)
title_short Long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: A randomised phase II trial (ISRCTN53643604)
title_sort long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: a randomised phase ii trial (isrctn53643604)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32007714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.12.028
work_keys_str_mv AT caffertyfayh longtermoutcomeswithintensiveinductionchemotherapycarboplatinbleomycinvincristineandcisplatinbleomycinetoposideandcisplatinandstandardbleomycinetoposideandcisplatininpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursarandomisedphaseiitrialisrctn53643604
AT whitejeffd longtermoutcomeswithintensiveinductionchemotherapycarboplatinbleomycinvincristineandcisplatinbleomycinetoposideandcisplatinandstandardbleomycinetoposideandcisplatininpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursarandomisedphaseiitrialisrctn53643604
AT shamashjonathan longtermoutcomeswithintensiveinductionchemotherapycarboplatinbleomycinvincristineandcisplatinbleomycinetoposideandcisplatinandstandardbleomycinetoposideandcisplatininpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursarandomisedphaseiitrialisrctn53643604
AT hennigivo longtermoutcomeswithintensiveinductionchemotherapycarboplatinbleomycinvincristineandcisplatinbleomycinetoposideandcisplatinandstandardbleomycinetoposideandcisplatininpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursarandomisedphaseiitrialisrctn53643604
AT stenningsallyp longtermoutcomeswithintensiveinductionchemotherapycarboplatinbleomycinvincristineandcisplatinbleomycinetoposideandcisplatinandstandardbleomycinetoposideandcisplatininpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursarandomisedphaseiitrialisrctn53643604
AT huddartroberta longtermoutcomeswithintensiveinductionchemotherapycarboplatinbleomycinvincristineandcisplatinbleomycinetoposideandcisplatinandstandardbleomycinetoposideandcisplatininpoorprognosisgermcelltumoursarandomisedphaseiitrialisrctn53643604