Cargando…

Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe

Tinnitus remains a scientific and clinical problem whereby, in spite of increasing knowledge on effective treatment and management for tinnitus, very little impact on clinical practice has been observed. There is evidence that prolonged, obscure and indirect referral trajectories persist in usual ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cima, Rilana F F, Kikidis, Dimitris, Mazurek, Birgit, Haider, Haúla, Cederroth, Chistopher R, Norena, Arnaud, Lapira, Alec, Bibas, Athanasios, Hoare, Derek J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029346
_version_ 1783501709207666688
author Cima, Rilana F F
Kikidis, Dimitris
Mazurek, Birgit
Haider, Haúla
Cederroth, Chistopher R
Norena, Arnaud
Lapira, Alec
Bibas, Athanasios
Hoare, Derek J
author_facet Cima, Rilana F F
Kikidis, Dimitris
Mazurek, Birgit
Haider, Haúla
Cederroth, Chistopher R
Norena, Arnaud
Lapira, Alec
Bibas, Athanasios
Hoare, Derek J
author_sort Cima, Rilana F F
collection PubMed
description Tinnitus remains a scientific and clinical problem whereby, in spite of increasing knowledge on effective treatment and management for tinnitus, very little impact on clinical practice has been observed. There is evidence that prolonged, obscure and indirect referral trajectories persist in usual tinnitus care. OBJECTIVE: It is widely acknowledged that efforts to change professional practice are more successful if barriers are identified and implementation activities are systematically tailored to the specific determinants of practice. The aim of this study was to administer a health service evaluation survey to scope current practice and knowledge of standards in tinnitus care across Europe. The purpose of this survey was to specifically inform the development process of a European clinical guideline that would be implementable in all European countries. DESIGN: A health service evaluation survey was carried out. SETTING: The survey was carried out online across Europe. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical experts, researchers and policy-makers involved in national tinnitus healthcare and decision-making. OUTCOME MEASURES: A survey was developed by the study steering group, piloted on clinicians from the TINNET network and underwent two iterations before being finalised. The survey was then administered to clinicians and policy-makers from 24 European countries. RESULTS: Data collected from 625 respondents revealed significant differences in national healthcare structures, use of tinnitus definitions, opinions on characteristics of patients with tinnitus, assessment procedures and particularly in available treatment options. Differences between northern and eastern European countries were most notable. CONCLUSIONS: Most European countries do not have national clinical guidelines for the management of tinnitus. Reflective of this, clinical practices in tinnitus healthcare vary dramatically across countries. This equates to inequities of care for people with tinnitus across Europe and an opportunity to introduce standards in the form of a European clinical guideline. This survey has highlighted important barriers and facilitators to the implementation of such a guideline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70450982020-03-09 Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe Cima, Rilana F F Kikidis, Dimitris Mazurek, Birgit Haider, Haúla Cederroth, Chistopher R Norena, Arnaud Lapira, Alec Bibas, Athanasios Hoare, Derek J BMJ Open Health Services Research Tinnitus remains a scientific and clinical problem whereby, in spite of increasing knowledge on effective treatment and management for tinnitus, very little impact on clinical practice has been observed. There is evidence that prolonged, obscure and indirect referral trajectories persist in usual tinnitus care. OBJECTIVE: It is widely acknowledged that efforts to change professional practice are more successful if barriers are identified and implementation activities are systematically tailored to the specific determinants of practice. The aim of this study was to administer a health service evaluation survey to scope current practice and knowledge of standards in tinnitus care across Europe. The purpose of this survey was to specifically inform the development process of a European clinical guideline that would be implementable in all European countries. DESIGN: A health service evaluation survey was carried out. SETTING: The survey was carried out online across Europe. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical experts, researchers and policy-makers involved in national tinnitus healthcare and decision-making. OUTCOME MEASURES: A survey was developed by the study steering group, piloted on clinicians from the TINNET network and underwent two iterations before being finalised. The survey was then administered to clinicians and policy-makers from 24 European countries. RESULTS: Data collected from 625 respondents revealed significant differences in national healthcare structures, use of tinnitus definitions, opinions on characteristics of patients with tinnitus, assessment procedures and particularly in available treatment options. Differences between northern and eastern European countries were most notable. CONCLUSIONS: Most European countries do not have national clinical guidelines for the management of tinnitus. Reflective of this, clinical practices in tinnitus healthcare vary dramatically across countries. This equates to inequities of care for people with tinnitus across Europe and an opportunity to introduce standards in the form of a European clinical guideline. This survey has highlighted important barriers and facilitators to the implementation of such a guideline. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7045098/ /pubmed/31969359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029346 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Cima, Rilana F F
Kikidis, Dimitris
Mazurek, Birgit
Haider, Haúla
Cederroth, Chistopher R
Norena, Arnaud
Lapira, Alec
Bibas, Athanasios
Hoare, Derek J
Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe
title Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe
title_full Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe
title_fullStr Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe
title_full_unstemmed Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe
title_short Tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across Europe
title_sort tinnitus healthcare: a survey revealing extensive variation in opinion and practices across europe
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029346
work_keys_str_mv AT cimarilanaff tinnitushealthcareasurveyrevealingextensivevariationinopinionandpracticesacrosseurope
AT kikidisdimitris tinnitushealthcareasurveyrevealingextensivevariationinopinionandpracticesacrosseurope
AT mazurekbirgit tinnitushealthcareasurveyrevealingextensivevariationinopinionandpracticesacrosseurope
AT haiderhaula tinnitushealthcareasurveyrevealingextensivevariationinopinionandpracticesacrosseurope
AT cederrothchistopherr tinnitushealthcareasurveyrevealingextensivevariationinopinionandpracticesacrosseurope
AT norenaarnaud tinnitushealthcareasurveyrevealingextensivevariationinopinionandpracticesacrosseurope
AT lapiraalec tinnitushealthcareasurveyrevealingextensivevariationinopinionandpracticesacrosseurope
AT bibasathanasios tinnitushealthcareasurveyrevealingextensivevariationinopinionandpracticesacrosseurope
AT hoarederekj tinnitushealthcareasurveyrevealingextensivevariationinopinionandpracticesacrosseurope