Cargando…

Dissemination of trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic clinical trials: an audit of trial investigators intentions

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of Phase III clinical trials given a favourable opinion by a research ethics committee in the UK that provided trial results to those who participated. DESIGN: Audit of records. SETTING: Phase III clinical trials registered on the UK’s research permissions syst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Raza, M Zulfiqar, Bruhn, Hanne, Gillies, Katie
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:	Ethics
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045144/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32014881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035730

Ejemplares similares

Providing trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic effectiveness RCTs: a scoping review
por: Bruhn, Hanne, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Informal professionalization of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials in Russia
por: Zvonareva, Olga, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Denneny, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Results dissemination of registered clinical trials across Polish academic institutions: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Strzebonska, Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Advance consent for participation in randomised controlled trials for emergency conditions: a scoping review
por: Niznick, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Public reporting of clinical trial findings as an ethical responsibility to participants: a qualitative study
por: Morrow, Richard L, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Phase I trial compensation: How much do healthy volunteers actually earn from clinical trial enrollment?
por: Fisher, Jill A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review
por: Niznick, Naomi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Lived Experience Of Participants in an African RandomiseD trial (LEOPARD): protocol for an in-depth qualitative study within a multisite randomised controlled trial for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis
por: Lawrence, David S, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Ensuring respect for persons in COMPASS: a cluster randomised pragmatic clinical trial
por: Andrews, Joseph E, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Details of risk–benefit communication in informed consent documents for phase I/II trials
por: Kahrass, Hannes, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cross-sectional assessment of patient attitudes towards participation in clinical trials: does making results publicly available matter?
por: Jones, Christopher W, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Do protocols for new randomised trials take previous similar trials into account? Cohort study of contemporary trial protocols
por: Paludan-Müller, Asger Sand, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Money-oriented risk-takers or deliberate decision-makers: a cross-sectional survey study of participants in controlled human infection trials
por: Hoogerwerf, Marie-Astrid, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Continued Access to Investigational Medicinal Products for Clinical Trial Participants—An Industry Approach
por: KELMAN, ARIELLA, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

TwiC or treat? Are trials within cohorts ethically defensible?
por: Weijer, Charles, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Informed consent in cluster randomised trials: a guide for the perplexed
por: Nix, Hayden P, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reconsidering ‘minimal risk’ to expand the repertoire of trials with waiver of informed consent for research
por: Monach, Paul A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A critical appraisal of clinical trials conducted and subsequent drug approvals in India and South Africa
por: Limaye, Dnyanesh, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Measuring clinical trial transparency: an empirical analysis of newly approved drugs and large pharmaceutical companies
por: Miller, Jennifer E, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Protocol for a systematic scoping review of reasons given to justify the performance of randomised controlled trials
por: Dewar, Brian, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

What, how, when and who of trial results summaries for trial participants: stakeholder-informed guidance from the RECAP project
por: Bruhn, Hanne, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Patient burden and clinical advances associated with postapproval monotherapy cancer drug trials: a retrospective cohort study
por: Carlisle, Benjamin Gregory, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Rationalisations for women-only randomised controlled trials in conditions that affect both sexes: a scoping review protocol
por: Matthewson, Ainsley, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Consent concerns in clinical trials of investigational therapies for COVID-19: Vulnerability versus voluntariness
por: Bhatt, Arun
Publicado: (2020)

Consent processes in cluster-randomised trials in residential facilities for older adults: a systematic review of reporting practices and proposed guidelines
por: DiazOrdaz, Karla, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Improved parental understanding by an enhanced informed consent form: a randomized controlled study nested in a paediatric drug trial
por: Koonrungsesomboon, Nut, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Predictors of patient’s intentions to participate in pragmatic clinical trials: An initial exploration
por: Gibson, Bryan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Clinical trial registration, reporting, publication and FDAAA compliance: a cross-sectional analysis and ranking of new drugs approved by the FDA in 2012
por: Miller, Jennifer E, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
por: Mhaskar, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Deferred consent in emergency obstetric research: findings from qualitative interviews with women and recruiters in the ACROBAT pilot trial for severe postpartum haemorrhage
por: Sweeney, Lorna, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Best Case/Worst Case: protocol for a multisite randomised clinical trial of a scenario planning intervention for patients with kidney failure
por: Haug, Karlie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

How do community advisory boards fulfil their ethical role in HIV clinical trials? A protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence
por: Pancras, Godwin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Parental comprehension of the benefits/risks of first-line randomised clinical trials in children with solid tumours: a two-stage cross-sectional interview study
por: Chappuy, Hélène, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study
por: Parker, Melissa J, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Clinical trial transparency and data sharing among biopharmaceutical companies and the role of company size, location and product type: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis
por: Axson, Sydney A, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

2052: Empirical assessment of a theatrical performance on attitudes and behavior intentions toward research: The informed consent play
por: Rothwell, Erin, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Self-directed multimedia process for delivering participant informed consent
por: Chapman, Niamh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

2171: Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in Clinical and Translational Studies
por: Otado, Jane A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Approaches to governance of participant-led research: a qualitative case study
por: Grant, Azure Dominique, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_b0cb787f37dg9vogubq6a8fiqq