Cargando…
Mixed methods pilot study of a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme among adults with pre-diabetes in the USA
OBJECTIVES: (1) To estimate weight change from a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme (LC-DPP) and (2) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an LC-DPP. RESEARCH DESIGN: Single-arm, mixed methods (ie, integration of quantitative and qualitative data) pilot study. SETTING: Primary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033397 |
_version_ | 1783501734489882624 |
---|---|
author | Hafez Griauzde, Dina Saslow, Laura Patterson, Kaitlyn Ansari, Tahoora Liestenfeltz, Bradley Tisack, Aaron Bihn, Patti Shopinski, Samuel Richardson, Caroline R |
author_facet | Hafez Griauzde, Dina Saslow, Laura Patterson, Kaitlyn Ansari, Tahoora Liestenfeltz, Bradley Tisack, Aaron Bihn, Patti Shopinski, Samuel Richardson, Caroline R |
author_sort | Hafez Griauzde, Dina |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: (1) To estimate weight change from a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme (LC-DPP) and (2) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an LC-DPP. RESEARCH DESIGN: Single-arm, mixed methods (ie, integration of quantitative and qualitative data) pilot study. SETTING: Primary care clinic within a large academic medical centre in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with pre-diabetes and Body Mass Index of ≥25 kg/m(2). INTERVENTION: We adapted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP)—an evidence-based, low-fat dietary intervention—to teach participants to follow a very low-carbohydrate diet (VLCD). Participants attended 23 group-based classes over 1 year. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were (1) weight change and (2) percentage of participants who achieved ≥5% wt loss. Secondary outcome measures included intervention feasibility and acceptability (eg, attendance and qualitative interview feedback). RESULTS: Our enrolment target was 22. One person dropped out before a baseline weight was obtained; data from 21 individuals were analysed. Mean weight loss in kilogram was 4.3 (SD 4.8) at 6 months and 4.9 (SD 5.8) at 12 months. Mean per cent body weight changes were 4.5 (SD 5.0) at 6 months and 5.2 (SD 6.0) at 12 months; 8/21 individuals (38%) achieved ≥5% wt loss at 12 months. Mean attendance was 10.3/16 weekly sessions and 3.4/7 biweekly or monthly sessions. Among interviewees (n=14), three factors facilitated VLCD adherence: (1) enjoyment of low-carbohydrate foods, (2) diminished hunger and cravings and (3) health benefits beyond weight loss. Three factors hindered VLCD adherence: (1) enjoyment of high-carbohydrate foods, (2) lack of social support and (3) difficulty preplanning meals. CONCLUSIONS: An LC-DPP is feasible, acceptable and may be an effective option to help individuals with pre-diabetes to lose weight. Data from this pilot will be used to plan a fully powered randomised controlled trial of weight loss among NDPP versus LC-DPP participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03258918. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7045213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70452132020-03-09 Mixed methods pilot study of a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme among adults with pre-diabetes in the USA Hafez Griauzde, Dina Saslow, Laura Patterson, Kaitlyn Ansari, Tahoora Liestenfeltz, Bradley Tisack, Aaron Bihn, Patti Shopinski, Samuel Richardson, Caroline R BMJ Open Nutrition and Metabolism OBJECTIVES: (1) To estimate weight change from a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme (LC-DPP) and (2) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of an LC-DPP. RESEARCH DESIGN: Single-arm, mixed methods (ie, integration of quantitative and qualitative data) pilot study. SETTING: Primary care clinic within a large academic medical centre in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with pre-diabetes and Body Mass Index of ≥25 kg/m(2). INTERVENTION: We adapted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP)—an evidence-based, low-fat dietary intervention—to teach participants to follow a very low-carbohydrate diet (VLCD). Participants attended 23 group-based classes over 1 year. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were (1) weight change and (2) percentage of participants who achieved ≥5% wt loss. Secondary outcome measures included intervention feasibility and acceptability (eg, attendance and qualitative interview feedback). RESULTS: Our enrolment target was 22. One person dropped out before a baseline weight was obtained; data from 21 individuals were analysed. Mean weight loss in kilogram was 4.3 (SD 4.8) at 6 months and 4.9 (SD 5.8) at 12 months. Mean per cent body weight changes were 4.5 (SD 5.0) at 6 months and 5.2 (SD 6.0) at 12 months; 8/21 individuals (38%) achieved ≥5% wt loss at 12 months. Mean attendance was 10.3/16 weekly sessions and 3.4/7 biweekly or monthly sessions. Among interviewees (n=14), three factors facilitated VLCD adherence: (1) enjoyment of low-carbohydrate foods, (2) diminished hunger and cravings and (3) health benefits beyond weight loss. Three factors hindered VLCD adherence: (1) enjoyment of high-carbohydrate foods, (2) lack of social support and (3) difficulty preplanning meals. CONCLUSIONS: An LC-DPP is feasible, acceptable and may be an effective option to help individuals with pre-diabetes to lose weight. Data from this pilot will be used to plan a fully powered randomised controlled trial of weight loss among NDPP versus LC-DPP participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03258918. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7045213/ /pubmed/31969366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033397 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Nutrition and Metabolism Hafez Griauzde, Dina Saslow, Laura Patterson, Kaitlyn Ansari, Tahoora Liestenfeltz, Bradley Tisack, Aaron Bihn, Patti Shopinski, Samuel Richardson, Caroline R Mixed methods pilot study of a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme among adults with pre-diabetes in the USA |
title | Mixed methods pilot study of a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme among adults with pre-diabetes in the USA |
title_full | Mixed methods pilot study of a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme among adults with pre-diabetes in the USA |
title_fullStr | Mixed methods pilot study of a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme among adults with pre-diabetes in the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | Mixed methods pilot study of a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme among adults with pre-diabetes in the USA |
title_short | Mixed methods pilot study of a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme among adults with pre-diabetes in the USA |
title_sort | mixed methods pilot study of a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention programme among adults with pre-diabetes in the usa |
topic | Nutrition and Metabolism |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31969366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033397 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hafezgriauzdedina mixedmethodspilotstudyofalowcarbohydratediabetespreventionprogrammeamongadultswithprediabetesintheusa AT saslowlaura mixedmethodspilotstudyofalowcarbohydratediabetespreventionprogrammeamongadultswithprediabetesintheusa AT pattersonkaitlyn mixedmethodspilotstudyofalowcarbohydratediabetespreventionprogrammeamongadultswithprediabetesintheusa AT ansaritahoora mixedmethodspilotstudyofalowcarbohydratediabetespreventionprogrammeamongadultswithprediabetesintheusa AT liestenfeltzbradley mixedmethodspilotstudyofalowcarbohydratediabetespreventionprogrammeamongadultswithprediabetesintheusa AT tisackaaron mixedmethodspilotstudyofalowcarbohydratediabetespreventionprogrammeamongadultswithprediabetesintheusa AT bihnpatti mixedmethodspilotstudyofalowcarbohydratediabetespreventionprogrammeamongadultswithprediabetesintheusa AT shopinskisamuel mixedmethodspilotstudyofalowcarbohydratediabetespreventionprogrammeamongadultswithprediabetesintheusa AT richardsoncaroliner mixedmethodspilotstudyofalowcarbohydratediabetespreventionprogrammeamongadultswithprediabetesintheusa |