Cargando…

Gastrostomy uptake in motor neurone disease: a mixed-methods study of patients’ decision making

OBJECTIVES: Gastrostomy decision making is a complicated, multifaceted process for people with motor neuron disease (MND). This study explored demographic and disease-related factors that may impact on gastrostomy uptake; and reasons why people with MND accepted or declined gastrostomy, with a focus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labra, Julie, Hogden, Anne, Power, Emma, James, Natalie, Flood, Victoria M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32102824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034751
_version_ 1783501740686966784
author Labra, Julie
Hogden, Anne
Power, Emma
James, Natalie
Flood, Victoria M
author_facet Labra, Julie
Hogden, Anne
Power, Emma
James, Natalie
Flood, Victoria M
author_sort Labra, Julie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Gastrostomy decision making is a complicated, multifaceted process for people with motor neuron disease (MND). This study explored demographic and disease-related factors that may impact on gastrostomy uptake; and reasons why people with MND accepted or declined gastrostomy, with a focus on how perceptions of swallowing and nutrition may influence decision making. DESIGN: Prospective, cross sectional, mixed methods. SETTING: An Australian multidisciplinary, specialty MND Service. PARTICIPANTS: 33 patients were recommended gastrostomy by the treating medical specialist. 16 of 33 were invited to participate in the prospective decision making study; of whom 10 provided informed consent. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and disease-related factors contributing to uptake are described. A stepped approach was applied to gain a comprehensive understanding of why people with MND accept or decline gastrostomy. Instruments included standardised assessments, nutrition survey and semistructured interview. Data were collected at three separate appointments, spanning a 3-week period. RESULTS: Gastrostomy uptake was 73% following medical specialist recommendation. Participants took days, weeks or months to consider their preferences, with lengthy hospital waiting times for the procedure. Gender, site of onset and rate of disease progression were observed to contribute to uptake. Age and symptom duration did not. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data suggests that patient perceptions of swallowing and nutrition contribute to gastrostomy acceptance; however, the decision making process is heterogeneous and these factors may not be the sole or primary reasons for acceptance. Other reported factors included: reducing carer burden, improving quality of life, increasing independence, continuing participation in social outings and gaining control. CONCLUSIONS: Future research may give greater insight into how healthcare organisations can better facilitate gastrostomy decision making, to meet the needs of people living with MND. Larger, prospective, multisite studies may build on these findings to better inform clinical guidelines and minimise the impacts of delayed gastrostomy insertion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70452392020-03-09 Gastrostomy uptake in motor neurone disease: a mixed-methods study of patients’ decision making Labra, Julie Hogden, Anne Power, Emma James, Natalie Flood, Victoria M BMJ Open Neurology OBJECTIVES: Gastrostomy decision making is a complicated, multifaceted process for people with motor neuron disease (MND). This study explored demographic and disease-related factors that may impact on gastrostomy uptake; and reasons why people with MND accepted or declined gastrostomy, with a focus on how perceptions of swallowing and nutrition may influence decision making. DESIGN: Prospective, cross sectional, mixed methods. SETTING: An Australian multidisciplinary, specialty MND Service. PARTICIPANTS: 33 patients were recommended gastrostomy by the treating medical specialist. 16 of 33 were invited to participate in the prospective decision making study; of whom 10 provided informed consent. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and disease-related factors contributing to uptake are described. A stepped approach was applied to gain a comprehensive understanding of why people with MND accept or decline gastrostomy. Instruments included standardised assessments, nutrition survey and semistructured interview. Data were collected at three separate appointments, spanning a 3-week period. RESULTS: Gastrostomy uptake was 73% following medical specialist recommendation. Participants took days, weeks or months to consider their preferences, with lengthy hospital waiting times for the procedure. Gender, site of onset and rate of disease progression were observed to contribute to uptake. Age and symptom duration did not. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data suggests that patient perceptions of swallowing and nutrition contribute to gastrostomy acceptance; however, the decision making process is heterogeneous and these factors may not be the sole or primary reasons for acceptance. Other reported factors included: reducing carer burden, improving quality of life, increasing independence, continuing participation in social outings and gaining control. CONCLUSIONS: Future research may give greater insight into how healthcare organisations can better facilitate gastrostomy decision making, to meet the needs of people living with MND. Larger, prospective, multisite studies may build on these findings to better inform clinical guidelines and minimise the impacts of delayed gastrostomy insertion. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7045239/ /pubmed/32102824 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034751 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Neurology
Labra, Julie
Hogden, Anne
Power, Emma
James, Natalie
Flood, Victoria M
Gastrostomy uptake in motor neurone disease: a mixed-methods study of patients’ decision making
title Gastrostomy uptake in motor neurone disease: a mixed-methods study of patients’ decision making
title_full Gastrostomy uptake in motor neurone disease: a mixed-methods study of patients’ decision making
title_fullStr Gastrostomy uptake in motor neurone disease: a mixed-methods study of patients’ decision making
title_full_unstemmed Gastrostomy uptake in motor neurone disease: a mixed-methods study of patients’ decision making
title_short Gastrostomy uptake in motor neurone disease: a mixed-methods study of patients’ decision making
title_sort gastrostomy uptake in motor neurone disease: a mixed-methods study of patients’ decision making
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32102824
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034751
work_keys_str_mv AT labrajulie gastrostomyuptakeinmotorneuronediseaseamixedmethodsstudyofpatientsdecisionmaking
AT hogdenanne gastrostomyuptakeinmotorneuronediseaseamixedmethodsstudyofpatientsdecisionmaking
AT poweremma gastrostomyuptakeinmotorneuronediseaseamixedmethodsstudyofpatientsdecisionmaking
AT jamesnatalie gastrostomyuptakeinmotorneuronediseaseamixedmethodsstudyofpatientsdecisionmaking
AT floodvictoriam gastrostomyuptakeinmotorneuronediseaseamixedmethodsstudyofpatientsdecisionmaking