Cargando…
Evaluating follow-up and complexity in cancer clinical trials (EFACCT): an eDelphi study of research professionals’ perspectives
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient follow-up and complexity in cancer clinical trial delivery, using consensus methods to: (1) identify research professionals’ priorities, (2) understand localised challenges, (3) define study complexity and workloads supporting the development of a trial rating and com...
Autores principales: | Jones, Helene Markham, Curtis, Ffion, Law, Graham, Bridle, Christopher, Boyle, Dorothy, Ahmed, Tanweer |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034269 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Defining and Scoping Participatory Health Informatics: An eDelphi Study
por: Denecke, Kerstin, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Paediatric pneumonia research priorities in the context of COVID-19: An eDelphi study
por: King, Carina, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Priority research questions in atopic dermatitis: an International Eczema Council eDelphi consensus
por: Abuabara, K., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Clinical information quality of digital health technologies: protocol for an international eDelphi study
por: Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study
por: Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip, et al.
Publicado: (2022)