Cargando…

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve local control; however, whether it can improve overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients remains controversial. We therefore aimed to examine the benefits of surgery alone, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Feng, Wang, Jili, Yu, Hao, Cheng, Xiaofei, Li, Xinke, Zhu, Xuan, Xu, Xiangming, Lin, Jianjiang, Chen, Xin, Yan, Senxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01497-4
_version_ 1783501770338598912
author Zhao, Feng
Wang, Jili
Yu, Hao
Cheng, Xiaofei
Li, Xinke
Zhu, Xuan
Xu, Xiangming
Lin, Jianjiang
Chen, Xin
Yan, Senxiang
author_facet Zhao, Feng
Wang, Jili
Yu, Hao
Cheng, Xiaofei
Li, Xinke
Zhu, Xuan
Xu, Xiangming
Lin, Jianjiang
Chen, Xin
Yan, Senxiang
author_sort Zhao, Feng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve local control; however, whether it can improve overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients remains controversial. We therefore aimed to examine the benefits of surgery alone, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT), adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy in stage II (T3/4N0M0) and III (any T and N + M0) on the OS of rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Date from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were used. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare patient prognoses across different treatment modalities. Cox hazard regression analysis were used to identify independent predictors of OS. RESULTS: For stage T3/4N0M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 115.89 months (M), 111.97 M, and 117.22 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival, 88.96 M). For stage T1/2N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 121.50 M, 124.25 M, and 121.20 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 83.81 M). For stage T3/4N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT (HR = 0.436; 95% CI, 0.396~0.478; p < 0.001) resulted in significantly longer OS than adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy (mean survival, 104.47 M, 93.94 M, and 93.62 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 54.87 M). Older age (> 60 years), black race, unmarried status, high tumour grade, and tumour size > 5 cm were all associated with a poor prognosis (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy results in better OS than surgery alone in LARC patients. Neoadjuvant RT has the potential to be highly recommended over adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N + M0 patients; however, it showed no OS advantage over adjuvant RT or surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N0M0 and T1/2N + M0 patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70454102020-03-03 Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients Zhao, Feng Wang, Jili Yu, Hao Cheng, Xiaofei Li, Xinke Zhu, Xuan Xu, Xiangming Lin, Jianjiang Chen, Xin Yan, Senxiang Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve local control; however, whether it can improve overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients remains controversial. We therefore aimed to examine the benefits of surgery alone, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT), adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy in stage II (T3/4N0M0) and III (any T and N + M0) on the OS of rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Date from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were used. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare patient prognoses across different treatment modalities. Cox hazard regression analysis were used to identify independent predictors of OS. RESULTS: For stage T3/4N0M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 115.89 months (M), 111.97 M, and 117.22 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival, 88.96 M). For stage T1/2N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 121.50 M, 124.25 M, and 121.20 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 83.81 M). For stage T3/4N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT (HR = 0.436; 95% CI, 0.396~0.478; p < 0.001) resulted in significantly longer OS than adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy (mean survival, 104.47 M, 93.94 M, and 93.62 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 54.87 M). Older age (> 60 years), black race, unmarried status, high tumour grade, and tumour size > 5 cm were all associated with a poor prognosis (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy results in better OS than surgery alone in LARC patients. Neoadjuvant RT has the potential to be highly recommended over adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N + M0 patients; however, it showed no OS advantage over adjuvant RT or surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N0M0 and T1/2N + M0 patients. BioMed Central 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7045410/ /pubmed/32103755 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01497-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zhao, Feng
Wang, Jili
Yu, Hao
Cheng, Xiaofei
Li, Xinke
Zhu, Xuan
Xu, Xiangming
Lin, Jianjiang
Chen, Xin
Yan, Senxiang
Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients
title Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients
title_full Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients
title_short Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients
title_sort neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for t3/4n+m0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103755
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01497-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaofeng neoadjuvantradiotherapyimprovesoverallsurvivalfort34nm0rectalcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyof20300patients
AT wangjili neoadjuvantradiotherapyimprovesoverallsurvivalfort34nm0rectalcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyof20300patients
AT yuhao neoadjuvantradiotherapyimprovesoverallsurvivalfort34nm0rectalcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyof20300patients
AT chengxiaofei neoadjuvantradiotherapyimprovesoverallsurvivalfort34nm0rectalcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyof20300patients
AT lixinke neoadjuvantradiotherapyimprovesoverallsurvivalfort34nm0rectalcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyof20300patients
AT zhuxuan neoadjuvantradiotherapyimprovesoverallsurvivalfort34nm0rectalcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyof20300patients
AT xuxiangming neoadjuvantradiotherapyimprovesoverallsurvivalfort34nm0rectalcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyof20300patients
AT linjianjiang neoadjuvantradiotherapyimprovesoverallsurvivalfort34nm0rectalcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyof20300patients
AT chenxin neoadjuvantradiotherapyimprovesoverallsurvivalfort34nm0rectalcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyof20300patients
AT yansenxiang neoadjuvantradiotherapyimprovesoverallsurvivalfort34nm0rectalcancerpatientsapopulationbasedstudyof20300patients