Cargando…

Dosimetric consequences of image guidance techniques on robust optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy for treatment of breast Cancer

PURPOSE: To investigate the consequences of residual setup error on target dose distribution using various image registration strategies for breast cancer treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 11 post-lumpectomy patients who received IMPT, 44 dose distr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Xiaoying, Mailhot Vega, Raymond B., Li, Zuofeng, Zheng, Dandan, Mendenhall, Nancy, Bradley, Julie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01495-6
_version_ 1783501780258127872
author Liang, Xiaoying
Mailhot Vega, Raymond B.
Li, Zuofeng
Zheng, Dandan
Mendenhall, Nancy
Bradley, Julie A.
author_facet Liang, Xiaoying
Mailhot Vega, Raymond B.
Li, Zuofeng
Zheng, Dandan
Mendenhall, Nancy
Bradley, Julie A.
author_sort Liang, Xiaoying
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the consequences of residual setup error on target dose distribution using various image registration strategies for breast cancer treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 11 post-lumpectomy patients who received IMPT, 44 dose distributions were computed. For each patient, the original plan (Plan-O) and three verification plans were calculated using different alignments: bony anatomy (VPlan-B), breast tissue (VPlan-T), and skin (VPlan-S). The target coverage were evaluated for each alignment technique. Additionally, 2 subvolumes—BreastNearSkin (1-cm rim of anterior CTV) and BreastNearCW (1-cm rim of posterior CTV)—were created to help localize CTV underdosing. Furthermore, we divided the setup error into the posture error and breast error. Patients with a large posture error and those with good posture setup but a large breast error were identified to evaluate the effect of posture error and breast error. RESULTS: For Plan-O, VPlan-B, VPlan-T, and VPlan-S, respectively, the median (interquartile range) breast CTV D95 was 95.7%(94.7–96.3%), 95.1% (93.9–95.7%), 95.2% (94.8–95.6%), and 95.2% (94.9–95.7%); BreastNearCW D95 was 96.9% (95.6–97.3%), 94.8% (93.5–97.0%), 95.6% (94.8–97.0%), 95.6% (94.8–97.1%); and BreastNearSkin D95 was 94.1% (92.7–94.4%), 93.6% (92.2–94.5%), 93.5% (92.4–94.5%), and 94.4% (92.2–94.5%) of the prescription dose. 4/11 patients had ≥1% decrease in breast CTV D95, 1 of whom developed breast edema while the other 3 all had a > 2(o) posture error. The CTV D95 variation was within 1% for the patients with good posture setup but >2(o) breast error. CONCLUSION: Acceptable target coverage was achieved with all three alignment strategies. Breast tissue and skin alignment maintained the breast target coverage marginally better than bony alignment, with which the posterior CTV along the chest wall is the predominant area affected by under-dosing. For target dose distribution, posture error appears more influential than breast error.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70454662020-03-03 Dosimetric consequences of image guidance techniques on robust optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy for treatment of breast Cancer Liang, Xiaoying Mailhot Vega, Raymond B. Li, Zuofeng Zheng, Dandan Mendenhall, Nancy Bradley, Julie A. Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: To investigate the consequences of residual setup error on target dose distribution using various image registration strategies for breast cancer treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 11 post-lumpectomy patients who received IMPT, 44 dose distributions were computed. For each patient, the original plan (Plan-O) and three verification plans were calculated using different alignments: bony anatomy (VPlan-B), breast tissue (VPlan-T), and skin (VPlan-S). The target coverage were evaluated for each alignment technique. Additionally, 2 subvolumes—BreastNearSkin (1-cm rim of anterior CTV) and BreastNearCW (1-cm rim of posterior CTV)—were created to help localize CTV underdosing. Furthermore, we divided the setup error into the posture error and breast error. Patients with a large posture error and those with good posture setup but a large breast error were identified to evaluate the effect of posture error and breast error. RESULTS: For Plan-O, VPlan-B, VPlan-T, and VPlan-S, respectively, the median (interquartile range) breast CTV D95 was 95.7%(94.7–96.3%), 95.1% (93.9–95.7%), 95.2% (94.8–95.6%), and 95.2% (94.9–95.7%); BreastNearCW D95 was 96.9% (95.6–97.3%), 94.8% (93.5–97.0%), 95.6% (94.8–97.0%), 95.6% (94.8–97.1%); and BreastNearSkin D95 was 94.1% (92.7–94.4%), 93.6% (92.2–94.5%), 93.5% (92.4–94.5%), and 94.4% (92.2–94.5%) of the prescription dose. 4/11 patients had ≥1% decrease in breast CTV D95, 1 of whom developed breast edema while the other 3 all had a > 2(o) posture error. The CTV D95 variation was within 1% for the patients with good posture setup but >2(o) breast error. CONCLUSION: Acceptable target coverage was achieved with all three alignment strategies. Breast tissue and skin alignment maintained the breast target coverage marginally better than bony alignment, with which the posterior CTV along the chest wall is the predominant area affected by under-dosing. For target dose distribution, posture error appears more influential than breast error. BioMed Central 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7045466/ /pubmed/32103762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01495-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Liang, Xiaoying
Mailhot Vega, Raymond B.
Li, Zuofeng
Zheng, Dandan
Mendenhall, Nancy
Bradley, Julie A.
Dosimetric consequences of image guidance techniques on robust optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy for treatment of breast Cancer
title Dosimetric consequences of image guidance techniques on robust optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy for treatment of breast Cancer
title_full Dosimetric consequences of image guidance techniques on robust optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy for treatment of breast Cancer
title_fullStr Dosimetric consequences of image guidance techniques on robust optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy for treatment of breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric consequences of image guidance techniques on robust optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy for treatment of breast Cancer
title_short Dosimetric consequences of image guidance techniques on robust optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy for treatment of breast Cancer
title_sort dosimetric consequences of image guidance techniques on robust optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy for treatment of breast cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01495-6
work_keys_str_mv AT liangxiaoying dosimetricconsequencesofimageguidancetechniquesonrobustoptimizedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortreatmentofbreastcancer
AT mailhotvegaraymondb dosimetricconsequencesofimageguidancetechniquesonrobustoptimizedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortreatmentofbreastcancer
AT lizuofeng dosimetricconsequencesofimageguidancetechniquesonrobustoptimizedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortreatmentofbreastcancer
AT zhengdandan dosimetricconsequencesofimageguidancetechniquesonrobustoptimizedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortreatmentofbreastcancer
AT mendenhallnancy dosimetricconsequencesofimageguidancetechniquesonrobustoptimizedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortreatmentofbreastcancer
AT bradleyjuliea dosimetricconsequencesofimageguidancetechniquesonrobustoptimizedintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortreatmentofbreastcancer