Cargando…

Self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common health problem and has significant negative effects on a woman’s quality of life. The transvaginal mesh procedure is a durable reconstructive surgery, but the mesh kits are expensive for underdeveloped countries. Our previous case-series study show...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Juan, Yu, Jiajie, Morse, Abraham, Fünfgeld, Christian, Huang, Kuanhui, Gong, Jian, Tao, Guangshi, Wang, Binan, Wang, Yuling, Jiang, Xiangyang, Ababaikeli, Gulina, Liu, Peishu, Nisier, Hatiguli, Zhang, Xiaowei, Wang, Ping, Sun, Xin, Zhu, Lan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32102687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3966-3
_version_ 1783501811606355968
author Chen, Juan
Yu, Jiajie
Morse, Abraham
Fünfgeld, Christian
Huang, Kuanhui
Gong, Jian
Tao, Guangshi
Wang, Binan
Wang, Yuling
Jiang, Xiangyang
Ababaikeli, Gulina
Liu, Peishu
Nisier, Hatiguli
Zhang, Xiaowei
Wang, Ping
Sun, Xin
Zhu, Lan
author_facet Chen, Juan
Yu, Jiajie
Morse, Abraham
Fünfgeld, Christian
Huang, Kuanhui
Gong, Jian
Tao, Guangshi
Wang, Binan
Wang, Yuling
Jiang, Xiangyang
Ababaikeli, Gulina
Liu, Peishu
Nisier, Hatiguli
Zhang, Xiaowei
Wang, Ping
Sun, Xin
Zhu, Lan
author_sort Chen, Juan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common health problem and has significant negative effects on a woman’s quality of life. The transvaginal mesh procedure is a durable reconstructive surgery, but the mesh kits are expensive for underdeveloped countries. Our previous case-series study showed that the use of self-cut mesh had a good success rate (91.8% at 1-year follow-up) and low complication rate. This trial is designed to compare a self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh procedure with a mesh kit for the treatment of symptomatic stage III–IV anterior or apical prolapse in terms of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: The trial is a randomized controlled multicenter non-inferiority trial. The primary outcome measure is the composite success rate at 1-year follow-up. The secondary outcomes are anatomic outcomes of each vaginal segment (anterior, posterior and apical) using the POP-Q score, subjective improvement of quality of life according to questionnaires, intraoperative parameters, complications and costs. Analysis will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Based on a comparable success rate of 90% and 10% as the margin (β = 0.2 and one-sided α = 0.025), about 312 patients in total from 11 centers will be recruited including 10% dropout. The aims of the research are to demonstrate whether the self-cut mesh procedure is non-inferior to the mesh-kit procedure and to investigate the performance of titanium-coated mesh for vaginal prolapse repair. DISCUSSION: This multicenter non-inferiority trial will evaluate whether the efficacy and safety of self-cut mesh is non-inferior to mesh kits in women with severe symptomatic stage III–IV anterior or apical prolapse. If we are able to show that the self-cut mesh procedure is non-inferior to the mesh-kit procedure in success rates, then the self-cut mesh procedure may be more cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03283124. Registered on 17 January 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70456112020-03-03 Self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial Chen, Juan Yu, Jiajie Morse, Abraham Fünfgeld, Christian Huang, Kuanhui Gong, Jian Tao, Guangshi Wang, Binan Wang, Yuling Jiang, Xiangyang Ababaikeli, Gulina Liu, Peishu Nisier, Hatiguli Zhang, Xiaowei Wang, Ping Sun, Xin Zhu, Lan Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common health problem and has significant negative effects on a woman’s quality of life. The transvaginal mesh procedure is a durable reconstructive surgery, but the mesh kits are expensive for underdeveloped countries. Our previous case-series study showed that the use of self-cut mesh had a good success rate (91.8% at 1-year follow-up) and low complication rate. This trial is designed to compare a self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh procedure with a mesh kit for the treatment of symptomatic stage III–IV anterior or apical prolapse in terms of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: The trial is a randomized controlled multicenter non-inferiority trial. The primary outcome measure is the composite success rate at 1-year follow-up. The secondary outcomes are anatomic outcomes of each vaginal segment (anterior, posterior and apical) using the POP-Q score, subjective improvement of quality of life according to questionnaires, intraoperative parameters, complications and costs. Analysis will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Based on a comparable success rate of 90% and 10% as the margin (β = 0.2 and one-sided α = 0.025), about 312 patients in total from 11 centers will be recruited including 10% dropout. The aims of the research are to demonstrate whether the self-cut mesh procedure is non-inferior to the mesh-kit procedure and to investigate the performance of titanium-coated mesh for vaginal prolapse repair. DISCUSSION: This multicenter non-inferiority trial will evaluate whether the efficacy and safety of self-cut mesh is non-inferior to mesh kits in women with severe symptomatic stage III–IV anterior or apical prolapse. If we are able to show that the self-cut mesh procedure is non-inferior to the mesh-kit procedure in success rates, then the self-cut mesh procedure may be more cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03283124. Registered on 17 January 2018. BioMed Central 2020-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7045611/ /pubmed/32102687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3966-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Chen, Juan
Yu, Jiajie
Morse, Abraham
Fünfgeld, Christian
Huang, Kuanhui
Gong, Jian
Tao, Guangshi
Wang, Binan
Wang, Yuling
Jiang, Xiangyang
Ababaikeli, Gulina
Liu, Peishu
Nisier, Hatiguli
Zhang, Xiaowei
Wang, Ping
Sun, Xin
Zhu, Lan
Self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial
title Self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial
title_full Self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial
title_fullStr Self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial
title_full_unstemmed Self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial
title_short Self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial
title_sort self-cut titanium-coated polypropylene mesh versus pre-cut mesh-kit for transvaginal treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32102687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3966-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjuan selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT yujiajie selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT morseabraham selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT funfgeldchristian selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT huangkuanhui selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT gongjian selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT taoguangshi selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT wangbinan selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT wangyuling selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT jiangxiangyang selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT ababaikeligulina selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT liupeishu selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT nisierhatiguli selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT zhangxiaowei selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT wangping selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT sunxin selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial
AT zhulan selfcuttitaniumcoatedpolypropylenemeshversusprecutmeshkitfortransvaginaltreatmentofseverepelvicorganprolapsestudyprotocolforamulticenternoninferioritytrial