Cargando…

Comparing Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State Nanopores

[Image: see text] Nanopores bear great potential as single-molecule tools for bioanalytical sensing and sequencing, due to their exceptional sensing capabilities, high-throughput, and low cost. The detection principle relies on detecting small differences in the ionic current as biomolecules travers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fragasso, Alessio, Schmid, Sonja, Dekker, Cees
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b09353
_version_ 1783501831261913088
author Fragasso, Alessio
Schmid, Sonja
Dekker, Cees
author_facet Fragasso, Alessio
Schmid, Sonja
Dekker, Cees
author_sort Fragasso, Alessio
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Nanopores bear great potential as single-molecule tools for bioanalytical sensing and sequencing, due to their exceptional sensing capabilities, high-throughput, and low cost. The detection principle relies on detecting small differences in the ionic current as biomolecules traverse the nanopore. A major bottleneck for the further progress of this technology is the noise that is present in the ionic current recordings, because it limits the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and thereby the effective time resolution of the experiment. Here, we review the main types of noise at low and high frequencies and discuss the underlying physics. Moreover, we compare biological and solid-state nanopores in terms of the SNR, the important figure of merit, by measuring translocations of a short ssDNA through a selected set of nanopores under typical experimental conditions. We find that SiN(x) solid-state nanopores provide the highest SNR, due to the large currents at which they can be operated and the relatively low noise at high frequencies. However, the real game-changer for many applications is a controlled slowdown of the translocation speed, which for MspA was shown to increase the SNR > 160-fold. Finally, we discuss practical approaches for lowering the noise for optimal experimental performance and further development of the nanopore technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70456972020-02-28 Comparing Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State Nanopores Fragasso, Alessio Schmid, Sonja Dekker, Cees ACS Nano [Image: see text] Nanopores bear great potential as single-molecule tools for bioanalytical sensing and sequencing, due to their exceptional sensing capabilities, high-throughput, and low cost. The detection principle relies on detecting small differences in the ionic current as biomolecules traverse the nanopore. A major bottleneck for the further progress of this technology is the noise that is present in the ionic current recordings, because it limits the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and thereby the effective time resolution of the experiment. Here, we review the main types of noise at low and high frequencies and discuss the underlying physics. Moreover, we compare biological and solid-state nanopores in terms of the SNR, the important figure of merit, by measuring translocations of a short ssDNA through a selected set of nanopores under typical experimental conditions. We find that SiN(x) solid-state nanopores provide the highest SNR, due to the large currents at which they can be operated and the relatively low noise at high frequencies. However, the real game-changer for many applications is a controlled slowdown of the translocation speed, which for MspA was shown to increase the SNR > 160-fold. Finally, we discuss practical approaches for lowering the noise for optimal experimental performance and further development of the nanopore technology. American Chemical Society 2020-02-12 2020-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7045697/ /pubmed/32049492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b09353 Text en Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Fragasso, Alessio
Schmid, Sonja
Dekker, Cees
Comparing Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State Nanopores
title Comparing Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State Nanopores
title_full Comparing Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State Nanopores
title_fullStr Comparing Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State Nanopores
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State Nanopores
title_short Comparing Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State Nanopores
title_sort comparing current noise in biological and solid-state nanopores
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b09353
work_keys_str_mv AT fragassoalessio comparingcurrentnoiseinbiologicalandsolidstatenanopores
AT schmidsonja comparingcurrentnoiseinbiologicalandsolidstatenanopores
AT dekkercees comparingcurrentnoiseinbiologicalandsolidstatenanopores