Cargando…
Comparing Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State Nanopores
[Image: see text] Nanopores bear great potential as single-molecule tools for bioanalytical sensing and sequencing, due to their exceptional sensing capabilities, high-throughput, and low cost. The detection principle relies on detecting small differences in the ionic current as biomolecules travers...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American
Chemical Society
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b09353 |
_version_ | 1783501831261913088 |
---|---|
author | Fragasso, Alessio Schmid, Sonja Dekker, Cees |
author_facet | Fragasso, Alessio Schmid, Sonja Dekker, Cees |
author_sort | Fragasso, Alessio |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Nanopores bear great potential as single-molecule tools for bioanalytical sensing and sequencing, due to their exceptional sensing capabilities, high-throughput, and low cost. The detection principle relies on detecting small differences in the ionic current as biomolecules traverse the nanopore. A major bottleneck for the further progress of this technology is the noise that is present in the ionic current recordings, because it limits the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and thereby the effective time resolution of the experiment. Here, we review the main types of noise at low and high frequencies and discuss the underlying physics. Moreover, we compare biological and solid-state nanopores in terms of the SNR, the important figure of merit, by measuring translocations of a short ssDNA through a selected set of nanopores under typical experimental conditions. We find that SiN(x) solid-state nanopores provide the highest SNR, due to the large currents at which they can be operated and the relatively low noise at high frequencies. However, the real game-changer for many applications is a controlled slowdown of the translocation speed, which for MspA was shown to increase the SNR > 160-fold. Finally, we discuss practical approaches for lowering the noise for optimal experimental performance and further development of the nanopore technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7045697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American
Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70456972020-02-28 Comparing Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State Nanopores Fragasso, Alessio Schmid, Sonja Dekker, Cees ACS Nano [Image: see text] Nanopores bear great potential as single-molecule tools for bioanalytical sensing and sequencing, due to their exceptional sensing capabilities, high-throughput, and low cost. The detection principle relies on detecting small differences in the ionic current as biomolecules traverse the nanopore. A major bottleneck for the further progress of this technology is the noise that is present in the ionic current recordings, because it limits the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and thereby the effective time resolution of the experiment. Here, we review the main types of noise at low and high frequencies and discuss the underlying physics. Moreover, we compare biological and solid-state nanopores in terms of the SNR, the important figure of merit, by measuring translocations of a short ssDNA through a selected set of nanopores under typical experimental conditions. We find that SiN(x) solid-state nanopores provide the highest SNR, due to the large currents at which they can be operated and the relatively low noise at high frequencies. However, the real game-changer for many applications is a controlled slowdown of the translocation speed, which for MspA was shown to increase the SNR > 160-fold. Finally, we discuss practical approaches for lowering the noise for optimal experimental performance and further development of the nanopore technology. American Chemical Society 2020-02-12 2020-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7045697/ /pubmed/32049492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b09353 Text en Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Fragasso, Alessio Schmid, Sonja Dekker, Cees Comparing Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State Nanopores |
title | Comparing
Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State
Nanopores |
title_full | Comparing
Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State
Nanopores |
title_fullStr | Comparing
Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State
Nanopores |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing
Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State
Nanopores |
title_short | Comparing
Current Noise in Biological and Solid-State
Nanopores |
title_sort | comparing
current noise in biological and solid-state
nanopores |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32049492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b09353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fragassoalessio comparingcurrentnoiseinbiologicalandsolidstatenanopores AT schmidsonja comparingcurrentnoiseinbiologicalandsolidstatenanopores AT dekkercees comparingcurrentnoiseinbiologicalandsolidstatenanopores |