Cargando…

What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The social gradient in chronic disease (CD) is well-documented, and the ability to effectively self-manage is crucial to reducing morbidity and mortality from CD. This systematic review aimed to assess the moderating effect of socioeconomic status on self-management support (SMS) interve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hardman, Ruth, Begg, Stephen, Spelten, Evelien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32106889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5010-4
_version_ 1783501835605114880
author Hardman, Ruth
Begg, Stephen
Spelten, Evelien
author_facet Hardman, Ruth
Begg, Stephen
Spelten, Evelien
author_sort Hardman, Ruth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The social gradient in chronic disease (CD) is well-documented, and the ability to effectively self-manage is crucial to reducing morbidity and mortality from CD. This systematic review aimed to assess the moderating effect of socioeconomic status on self-management support (SMS) interventions in relation to participation, retention and post-intervention outcomes. METHODS: Six databases were searched for studies of any design published until December 2018. Eligible studies reported on outcomes from SMS interventions for adults with chronic disease, where socioeconomic status was recorded and a between-groups comparison on SES was made. Possible outcomes were participation rates, retention rates and clinical or behavioural post-intervention results. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were retrieved, including five studies on participation, five on attrition and nine studies reporting on outcomes following SMS intervention. All participation studies reported reduced engagement in low SES cohorts. Studies assessing retention and post-intervention outcomes had variable results, related to the diversity of interventions. A reduction in health disparity was seen in longer interventions that were individually tailored. Most studies did not provide a theoretical justification for the intervention being investigated, although four studies referred to Bandura’s concept of self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The limited research suggests that socioeconomic status does moderate the efficacy of SMS interventions, such that without careful tailoring and direct targeting of barriers to self-management, SMS may exacerbate the social gradient in chronic disease outcomes. Screening for patient disadvantage or workload, rather than simply recording SES, may increase the chances of tailored interventions being directed to those most likely to benefit from them. Future interventions for low SES populations should consider focussing more on treatment burden and patient capacity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration CRD42019124760. Registration date 17/4/19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70457332020-03-03 What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review Hardman, Ruth Begg, Stephen Spelten, Evelien BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The social gradient in chronic disease (CD) is well-documented, and the ability to effectively self-manage is crucial to reducing morbidity and mortality from CD. This systematic review aimed to assess the moderating effect of socioeconomic status on self-management support (SMS) interventions in relation to participation, retention and post-intervention outcomes. METHODS: Six databases were searched for studies of any design published until December 2018. Eligible studies reported on outcomes from SMS interventions for adults with chronic disease, where socioeconomic status was recorded and a between-groups comparison on SES was made. Possible outcomes were participation rates, retention rates and clinical or behavioural post-intervention results. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were retrieved, including five studies on participation, five on attrition and nine studies reporting on outcomes following SMS intervention. All participation studies reported reduced engagement in low SES cohorts. Studies assessing retention and post-intervention outcomes had variable results, related to the diversity of interventions. A reduction in health disparity was seen in longer interventions that were individually tailored. Most studies did not provide a theoretical justification for the intervention being investigated, although four studies referred to Bandura’s concept of self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The limited research suggests that socioeconomic status does moderate the efficacy of SMS interventions, such that without careful tailoring and direct targeting of barriers to self-management, SMS may exacerbate the social gradient in chronic disease outcomes. Screening for patient disadvantage or workload, rather than simply recording SES, may increase the chances of tailored interventions being directed to those most likely to benefit from them. Future interventions for low SES populations should consider focussing more on treatment burden and patient capacity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration CRD42019124760. Registration date 17/4/19. BioMed Central 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7045733/ /pubmed/32106889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5010-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hardman, Ruth
Begg, Stephen
Spelten, Evelien
What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review
title What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review
title_full What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review
title_fullStr What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review
title_short What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review
title_sort what impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32106889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5010-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hardmanruth whatimpactdochronicdiseaseselfmanagementsupportinterventionshaveonhealthinequitygapsrelatedtosocioeconomicstatusasystematicreview
AT beggstephen whatimpactdochronicdiseaseselfmanagementsupportinterventionshaveonhealthinequitygapsrelatedtosocioeconomicstatusasystematicreview
AT speltenevelien whatimpactdochronicdiseaseselfmanagementsupportinterventionshaveonhealthinequitygapsrelatedtosocioeconomicstatusasystematicreview