Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

BACKGROUND/AIM: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign, poorly understood disorder that is difficult to manage. Medical interventions such as sucralfate, sulfasalzine, human fibrin, and a high fibre diet are reported as the first line of treatment. The aim of this study is to perform a sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qari, Yousef, Mosli, Mahmoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898642
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_213_19
_version_ 1783501841806393344
author Qari, Yousef
Mosli, Mahmoud
author_facet Qari, Yousef
Mosli, Mahmoud
author_sort Qari, Yousef
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign, poorly understood disorder that is difficult to manage. Medical interventions such as sucralfate, sulfasalzine, human fibrin, and a high fibre diet are reported as the first line of treatment. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for SRUS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomised clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies that evaluated medical treatments for SRUS. Two authors independently performed selection of eligible studies based on eligiblity criteria. Data extraction from potentially eligible studies was carried out according to predefined data collection methods. Medical treatments, including sucralfate, sulfasalzine, human fibrin, a high fibre diet, and psyllium powder as a single or combination therapy were compared to placebo alone or combined with other treatments. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with ulcer remission; this was presented as pooled prevalence (PP) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The I(2) value and Q statistic test were used to test for heterogeneity. In the presence of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies with 216 patients (males = 118, females = 98) diagnosed with SRUS were analysed in the final meta-analysis. The pooled effect estimate of treatment efficacy revealed that, of the patients receiving medical treatment, 57% had resolution of their ulcers (PP 0.57; 95% CI; 0.41 to 0.73). Statistically significant heterogeneity was observed (I(2)= 63%; τ2 = 0.64, P = <0.01). The scarcity of RCTs comparing medical treatments with other interventions was a major limitation. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients receiving medical treatment for the management of SRUS experience resolution of their ulcers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70457672020-03-12 A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome Qari, Yousef Mosli, Mahmoud Saudi J Gastroenterol Systematic Review/Meta Analysis BACKGROUND/AIM: Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign, poorly understood disorder that is difficult to manage. Medical interventions such as sucralfate, sulfasalzine, human fibrin, and a high fibre diet are reported as the first line of treatment. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for SRUS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomised clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies that evaluated medical treatments for SRUS. Two authors independently performed selection of eligible studies based on eligiblity criteria. Data extraction from potentially eligible studies was carried out according to predefined data collection methods. Medical treatments, including sucralfate, sulfasalzine, human fibrin, a high fibre diet, and psyllium powder as a single or combination therapy were compared to placebo alone or combined with other treatments. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with ulcer remission; this was presented as pooled prevalence (PP) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The I(2) value and Q statistic test were used to test for heterogeneity. In the presence of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies with 216 patients (males = 118, females = 98) diagnosed with SRUS were analysed in the final meta-analysis. The pooled effect estimate of treatment efficacy revealed that, of the patients receiving medical treatment, 57% had resolution of their ulcers (PP 0.57; 95% CI; 0.41 to 0.73). Statistically significant heterogeneity was observed (I(2)= 63%; τ2 = 0.64, P = <0.01). The scarcity of RCTs comparing medical treatments with other interventions was a major limitation. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients receiving medical treatment for the management of SRUS experience resolution of their ulcers. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7045767/ /pubmed/31898642 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_213_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Systematic Review/Meta Analysis
Qari, Yousef
Mosli, Mahmoud
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome
topic Systematic Review/Meta Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898642
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjg.SJG_213_19
work_keys_str_mv AT qariyousef asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyofmedicaltreatmentsforthemanagementofsolitaryrectalulcersyndrome
AT moslimahmoud asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyofmedicaltreatmentsforthemanagementofsolitaryrectalulcersyndrome
AT qariyousef systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyofmedicaltreatmentsforthemanagementofsolitaryrectalulcersyndrome
AT moslimahmoud systematicreviewandmetaanalysisoftheefficacyofmedicaltreatmentsforthemanagementofsolitaryrectalulcersyndrome