Cargando…
Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the implementation of an intrapartum training package (PROMPT (PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training)) across a health service reduced the proportion of term babies born with Apgar score <7 at 5 min (<7(5mins)). DESIGN: Stepped-wedge cluster randomised co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31302601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008625 |
_version_ | 1783501844368064512 |
---|---|
author | Lenguerrand, Erik Winter, Cathy Siassakos, Dimitrios MacLennan, Graeme Innes, Karen Lynch, Pauline Cameron, Alan Crofts, Joanna McDonald, Alison McCormack, Kirsty Forrest, Mark Norrie, John Bhattacharya, Siladitya Draycott, Tim |
author_facet | Lenguerrand, Erik Winter, Cathy Siassakos, Dimitrios MacLennan, Graeme Innes, Karen Lynch, Pauline Cameron, Alan Crofts, Joanna McDonald, Alison McCormack, Kirsty Forrest, Mark Norrie, John Bhattacharya, Siladitya Draycott, Tim |
author_sort | Lenguerrand, Erik |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the implementation of an intrapartum training package (PROMPT (PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training)) across a health service reduced the proportion of term babies born with Apgar score <7 at 5 min (<7(5mins)). DESIGN: Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Twelve randomised maternity units with ≥900 births/year in Scotland. Three additional units were included in a supplementary analysis to assess the effect across Scotland. The intervention commenced in March 2014 with follow-up until September 2016. INTERVENTION: The PROMPT training package (Second edition), with subsequent unit-level implementation of PROMPT courses for all maternity staff. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of term babies with Apgar<7(5mins). RESULTS: 87 204 eligible births (99.2% with an Apgar score), of which 1291 infants had an Apgar<7(5mins) were delivered in the 12 randomised maternity units. Two units did not implement the intervention. The overall Apgar<7(5mins) rate observed in the 12 randomised units was 1.49%, increasing from 1.32% preintervention to 1.59% postintervention. Once adjusted for a secular time trend, the ‘intention-to-treat’ analysis indicated a moderate but non-significant reduction in the rate of term babies with an Apgar scores <7(5mins) following PROMPT training (OR=0.79 95%CI(0.63 to 1.01)). However, some units implemented the intervention earlier than their allocated step, whereas others delayed the intervention. The content and authenticity of the implemented intervention varied widely at unit level. When the actual date of implementation of the intervention in each unit was considered in the analysis, there was no evidence of improvement (OR=1.01 (0.84 to 1.22)). No intervention effect was detected by broadening the analysis to include all 15 large Scottish maternity units. Units with a history of higher rates of Apgar<7(5mins) maintained higher Apgar rates during the study (OR=2.09 (1.28 to 3.41)) compared with units with pre-study rates aligned to the national rate. CONCLUSIONS: PROMPT training, as implemented, had no effect on the rate of Apgar <7(5mins) in Scotland during the study period. Local implementation at scale was found to be more difficult than anticipated. Further research is required to understand why the positive effects observed in other single-unit studies have not been replicated in Scottish maternity units, and how units can be best supported to locally implement the intervention authentically and effectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11640515. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7045781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70457812020-03-09 Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial Lenguerrand, Erik Winter, Cathy Siassakos, Dimitrios MacLennan, Graeme Innes, Karen Lynch, Pauline Cameron, Alan Crofts, Joanna McDonald, Alison McCormack, Kirsty Forrest, Mark Norrie, John Bhattacharya, Siladitya Draycott, Tim BMJ Qual Saf Original Research OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the implementation of an intrapartum training package (PROMPT (PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training)) across a health service reduced the proportion of term babies born with Apgar score <7 at 5 min (<7(5mins)). DESIGN: Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Twelve randomised maternity units with ≥900 births/year in Scotland. Three additional units were included in a supplementary analysis to assess the effect across Scotland. The intervention commenced in March 2014 with follow-up until September 2016. INTERVENTION: The PROMPT training package (Second edition), with subsequent unit-level implementation of PROMPT courses for all maternity staff. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of term babies with Apgar<7(5mins). RESULTS: 87 204 eligible births (99.2% with an Apgar score), of which 1291 infants had an Apgar<7(5mins) were delivered in the 12 randomised maternity units. Two units did not implement the intervention. The overall Apgar<7(5mins) rate observed in the 12 randomised units was 1.49%, increasing from 1.32% preintervention to 1.59% postintervention. Once adjusted for a secular time trend, the ‘intention-to-treat’ analysis indicated a moderate but non-significant reduction in the rate of term babies with an Apgar scores <7(5mins) following PROMPT training (OR=0.79 95%CI(0.63 to 1.01)). However, some units implemented the intervention earlier than their allocated step, whereas others delayed the intervention. The content and authenticity of the implemented intervention varied widely at unit level. When the actual date of implementation of the intervention in each unit was considered in the analysis, there was no evidence of improvement (OR=1.01 (0.84 to 1.22)). No intervention effect was detected by broadening the analysis to include all 15 large Scottish maternity units. Units with a history of higher rates of Apgar<7(5mins) maintained higher Apgar rates during the study (OR=2.09 (1.28 to 3.41)) compared with units with pre-study rates aligned to the national rate. CONCLUSIONS: PROMPT training, as implemented, had no effect on the rate of Apgar <7(5mins) in Scotland during the study period. Local implementation at scale was found to be more difficult than anticipated. Further research is required to understand why the positive effects observed in other single-unit studies have not been replicated in Scottish maternity units, and how units can be best supported to locally implement the intervention authentically and effectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11640515. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02 2019-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7045781/ /pubmed/31302601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008625 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lenguerrand, Erik Winter, Cathy Siassakos, Dimitrios MacLennan, Graeme Innes, Karen Lynch, Pauline Cameron, Alan Crofts, Joanna McDonald, Alison McCormack, Kirsty Forrest, Mark Norrie, John Bhattacharya, Siladitya Draycott, Tim Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial |
title | Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in scotland: the thistle stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31302601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008625 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lenguerranderik effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wintercathy effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT siassakosdimitrios effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT maclennangraeme effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT inneskaren effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lynchpauline effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cameronalan effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT croftsjoanna effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mcdonaldalison effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mccormackkirsty effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT forrestmark effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT norriejohn effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bhattacharyasiladitya effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT draycotttim effectofhandsoninterprofessionalsimulationtrainingforlocalemergenciesinscotlandthethistlesteppedwedgedesignrandomisedcontrolledtrial |