Cargando…

Do solar system experiments constrain scalar–tensor gravity?

It is now established that, contrary to common belief, (electro-)vacuum Brans–Dicke gravity does not reduce to general relativity (GR) for large values of the Brans–Dicke coupling [Formula: see text] . Since the essence of experimental tests of scalar–tensor gravity consists of providing lower bound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faraoni, Valerio, Côté, Jeremy, Giusti, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32165858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7721-4
_version_ 1783501845570781184
author Faraoni, Valerio
Côté, Jeremy
Giusti, Andrea
author_facet Faraoni, Valerio
Côté, Jeremy
Giusti, Andrea
author_sort Faraoni, Valerio
collection PubMed
description It is now established that, contrary to common belief, (electro-)vacuum Brans–Dicke gravity does not reduce to general relativity (GR) for large values of the Brans–Dicke coupling [Formula: see text] . Since the essence of experimental tests of scalar–tensor gravity consists of providing lower bounds on [Formula: see text] , in light of the misguided assumption of the equivalence between the limit [Formula: see text] and the GR limit of Brans–Dicke gravity, the parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism on which these tests are based could be in jeopardy. We show that, in the linearized approximation used by the PPN formalism, the anomaly in the limit to general relativity disappears. However, it survives to second (and higher) order and in strong gravity. In other words, while the weak gravity regime cannot tell apart GR and [Formula: see text] Brans–Dicke gravity, when higher order terms in the PPN analysis of Brans–Dicke gravity are included, the latter never reduces to the one of GR in this limit. This fact is relevant for experiments aiming to test second order light deflection and Shapiro time delay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70457862020-03-10 Do solar system experiments constrain scalar–tensor gravity? Faraoni, Valerio Côté, Jeremy Giusti, Andrea Eur Phys J C Part Fields Regular Article - Theoretical Physics It is now established that, contrary to common belief, (electro-)vacuum Brans–Dicke gravity does not reduce to general relativity (GR) for large values of the Brans–Dicke coupling [Formula: see text] . Since the essence of experimental tests of scalar–tensor gravity consists of providing lower bounds on [Formula: see text] , in light of the misguided assumption of the equivalence between the limit [Formula: see text] and the GR limit of Brans–Dicke gravity, the parametrized post-Newtonian (PPN) formalism on which these tests are based could be in jeopardy. We show that, in the linearized approximation used by the PPN formalism, the anomaly in the limit to general relativity disappears. However, it survives to second (and higher) order and in strong gravity. In other words, while the weak gravity regime cannot tell apart GR and [Formula: see text] Brans–Dicke gravity, when higher order terms in the PPN analysis of Brans–Dicke gravity are included, the latter never reduces to the one of GR in this limit. This fact is relevant for experiments aiming to test second order light deflection and Shapiro time delay. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7045786/ /pubmed/32165858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7721-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Funded by SCOAP3
spellingShingle Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
Faraoni, Valerio
Côté, Jeremy
Giusti, Andrea
Do solar system experiments constrain scalar–tensor gravity?
title Do solar system experiments constrain scalar–tensor gravity?
title_full Do solar system experiments constrain scalar–tensor gravity?
title_fullStr Do solar system experiments constrain scalar–tensor gravity?
title_full_unstemmed Do solar system experiments constrain scalar–tensor gravity?
title_short Do solar system experiments constrain scalar–tensor gravity?
title_sort do solar system experiments constrain scalar–tensor gravity?
topic Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32165858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7721-4
work_keys_str_mv AT faraonivalerio dosolarsystemexperimentsconstrainscalartensorgravity
AT cotejeremy dosolarsystemexperimentsconstrainscalartensorgravity
AT giustiandrea dosolarsystemexperimentsconstrainscalartensorgravity