Cargando…

Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is frequently complicated by cytopenias. Thrombocytopenia is usually non severe and its frequency ranges from 20% to 40%. It is mostly an autoimmune process caused by autoantibodies against platelet surface glycoproteins and it is associated with worse prognosis in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galanopoulos, Nikolaos, Christoforidou, Anna, Bezirgiannidou, Zoe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR) 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32185250
http://dx.doi.org/10.31138/mjr.28.1.20
_version_ 1783501870492286976
author Galanopoulos, Nikolaos
Christoforidou, Anna
Bezirgiannidou, Zoe
author_facet Galanopoulos, Nikolaos
Christoforidou, Anna
Bezirgiannidou, Zoe
author_sort Galanopoulos, Nikolaos
collection PubMed
description Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is frequently complicated by cytopenias. Thrombocytopenia is usually non severe and its frequency ranges from 20% to 40%. It is mostly an autoimmune process caused by autoantibodies against platelet surface glycoproteins and it is associated with worse prognosis in SLE. It can also be a result of SLE treatment with azathioprine, methotrexate and rarely hydroxychloroquine or thrombotic microangiopathy or macrophage activation syndrome. If thrombocytopenia is mild (>50×10(9)/L) and there is no other evidence of disease there is no need of therapy. Severe thrombocytopenia is less frequent and needs therapeutic management. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of therapy. Continuous high dose oral prednisolone or pulse high dose methylprednisolone (MP) with or without intravenous immune globulin are used in the acute phase. Second line agents (hydroxychloroquine, danazol, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, rituximab) are usually needed. Splenectomy is indicated for recurrent or resistant cases. There are no evidence-based guidelines to facilitate selection of one drug over another but certainly the co-existence of other systemic SLE manifestations must be taken into account. Newer therapies are emerging although there is no consensus on the treatment of refractory lupus thrombocytopenia due to the absence of controlled randomized trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70459212020-03-17 Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications Galanopoulos, Nikolaos Christoforidou, Anna Bezirgiannidou, Zoe Mediterr J Rheumatol Review Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is frequently complicated by cytopenias. Thrombocytopenia is usually non severe and its frequency ranges from 20% to 40%. It is mostly an autoimmune process caused by autoantibodies against platelet surface glycoproteins and it is associated with worse prognosis in SLE. It can also be a result of SLE treatment with azathioprine, methotrexate and rarely hydroxychloroquine or thrombotic microangiopathy or macrophage activation syndrome. If thrombocytopenia is mild (>50×10(9)/L) and there is no other evidence of disease there is no need of therapy. Severe thrombocytopenia is less frequent and needs therapeutic management. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of therapy. Continuous high dose oral prednisolone or pulse high dose methylprednisolone (MP) with or without intravenous immune globulin are used in the acute phase. Second line agents (hydroxychloroquine, danazol, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, rituximab) are usually needed. Splenectomy is indicated for recurrent or resistant cases. There are no evidence-based guidelines to facilitate selection of one drug over another but certainly the co-existence of other systemic SLE manifestations must be taken into account. Newer therapies are emerging although there is no consensus on the treatment of refractory lupus thrombocytopenia due to the absence of controlled randomized trials. The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR) 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7045921/ /pubmed/32185250 http://dx.doi.org/10.31138/mjr.28.1.20 Text en © 2017 The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Review
Galanopoulos, Nikolaos
Christoforidou, Anna
Bezirgiannidou, Zoe
Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications
title Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications
title_full Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications
title_fullStr Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications
title_full_unstemmed Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications
title_short Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications
title_sort lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32185250
http://dx.doi.org/10.31138/mjr.28.1.20
work_keys_str_mv AT galanopoulosnikolaos lupusthrombocytopeniapathogenesisandtherapeuticimplications
AT christoforidouanna lupusthrombocytopeniapathogenesisandtherapeuticimplications
AT bezirgiannidouzoe lupusthrombocytopeniapathogenesisandtherapeuticimplications