Cargando…
Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is frequently complicated by cytopenias. Thrombocytopenia is usually non severe and its frequency ranges from 20% to 40%. It is mostly an autoimmune process caused by autoantibodies against platelet surface glycoproteins and it is associated with worse prognosis in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR)
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32185250 http://dx.doi.org/10.31138/mjr.28.1.20 |
_version_ | 1783501870492286976 |
---|---|
author | Galanopoulos, Nikolaos Christoforidou, Anna Bezirgiannidou, Zoe |
author_facet | Galanopoulos, Nikolaos Christoforidou, Anna Bezirgiannidou, Zoe |
author_sort | Galanopoulos, Nikolaos |
collection | PubMed |
description | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is frequently complicated by cytopenias. Thrombocytopenia is usually non severe and its frequency ranges from 20% to 40%. It is mostly an autoimmune process caused by autoantibodies against platelet surface glycoproteins and it is associated with worse prognosis in SLE. It can also be a result of SLE treatment with azathioprine, methotrexate and rarely hydroxychloroquine or thrombotic microangiopathy or macrophage activation syndrome. If thrombocytopenia is mild (>50×10(9)/L) and there is no other evidence of disease there is no need of therapy. Severe thrombocytopenia is less frequent and needs therapeutic management. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of therapy. Continuous high dose oral prednisolone or pulse high dose methylprednisolone (MP) with or without intravenous immune globulin are used in the acute phase. Second line agents (hydroxychloroquine, danazol, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, rituximab) are usually needed. Splenectomy is indicated for recurrent or resistant cases. There are no evidence-based guidelines to facilitate selection of one drug over another but certainly the co-existence of other systemic SLE manifestations must be taken into account. Newer therapies are emerging although there is no consensus on the treatment of refractory lupus thrombocytopenia due to the absence of controlled randomized trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7045921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70459212020-03-17 Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications Galanopoulos, Nikolaos Christoforidou, Anna Bezirgiannidou, Zoe Mediterr J Rheumatol Review Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is frequently complicated by cytopenias. Thrombocytopenia is usually non severe and its frequency ranges from 20% to 40%. It is mostly an autoimmune process caused by autoantibodies against platelet surface glycoproteins and it is associated with worse prognosis in SLE. It can also be a result of SLE treatment with azathioprine, methotrexate and rarely hydroxychloroquine or thrombotic microangiopathy or macrophage activation syndrome. If thrombocytopenia is mild (>50×10(9)/L) and there is no other evidence of disease there is no need of therapy. Severe thrombocytopenia is less frequent and needs therapeutic management. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of therapy. Continuous high dose oral prednisolone or pulse high dose methylprednisolone (MP) with or without intravenous immune globulin are used in the acute phase. Second line agents (hydroxychloroquine, danazol, azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, rituximab) are usually needed. Splenectomy is indicated for recurrent or resistant cases. There are no evidence-based guidelines to facilitate selection of one drug over another but certainly the co-existence of other systemic SLE manifestations must be taken into account. Newer therapies are emerging although there is no consensus on the treatment of refractory lupus thrombocytopenia due to the absence of controlled randomized trials. The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR) 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7045921/ /pubmed/32185250 http://dx.doi.org/10.31138/mjr.28.1.20 Text en © 2017 The Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology (MJR) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Review Galanopoulos, Nikolaos Christoforidou, Anna Bezirgiannidou, Zoe Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications |
title | Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications |
title_full | Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications |
title_fullStr | Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications |
title_full_unstemmed | Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications |
title_short | Lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications |
title_sort | lupus thrombocytopenia: pathogenesis and therapeutic implications |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32185250 http://dx.doi.org/10.31138/mjr.28.1.20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galanopoulosnikolaos lupusthrombocytopeniapathogenesisandtherapeuticimplications AT christoforidouanna lupusthrombocytopeniapathogenesisandtherapeuticimplications AT bezirgiannidouzoe lupusthrombocytopeniapathogenesisandtherapeuticimplications |