Cargando…

Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers between Young Adult Male Smokers and Nonsmokers

Background This study aims to compare the differences in the means of bone formation and resorption markers between young adult male smokers and nonsmokers. Methods This study employed a cross-sectional, descriptive design. Thirty-five smokers and 38 nonsmokers were recruited. All participants compl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Bashaireh, Ahmad M, Alqudah, Ola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140342
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6782
_version_ 1783501881778110464
author Al-Bashaireh, Ahmad M
Alqudah, Ola
author_facet Al-Bashaireh, Ahmad M
Alqudah, Ola
author_sort Al-Bashaireh, Ahmad M
collection PubMed
description Background This study aims to compare the differences in the means of bone formation and resorption markers between young adult male smokers and nonsmokers. Methods This study employed a cross-sectional, descriptive design. Thirty-five smokers and 38 nonsmokers were recruited. All participants completed self-reported questionnaires about demographics, physical activity, and smoking status. In addition, blood specimens were collected to determine serum levels of bone turnover markers. Results Regarding bone formation markers, the least square means (LSM) for osteoprotegerin (OPG) and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) were similar for smoking and nonsmoking groups. Regarding bone resorption markers, the LSM serum carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CTXI) level was found to be significantly lower in smokers than nonsmokers [0.82 ± 0.83 vs. 1.30 ± 0.82 ng/mL, F (1, 66) = 5.73, p = 0.020]. The LSM for soluble-receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (sRANKL) [1.64 ± 0.60 vs. 1.69 ± 0.62 ng/mL, F (1,64) = 10.74, p = 0.002] and RANKL/OPG [2.62 ± 1.09 vs. 2.81 ± 1.10 ng/mL, F (1,65) = 5.88, p = 0.018] were different for smoking and nonsmoking groups. Exploration of the moderating influence of physical activity on smoking effects revealed significant effect for the interaction between smoking status and physical activity on sRANKL [F (2, 64) = 8.63, p = 0.001] and RANKL/OPG ratio [F (2, 65) = 5.49, p = 0.006]. Conclusion Our study provides evidence for the effect of smoking on bone resorption markers in young adult males. Such effects should be carefully considered side by side with other lifestyles that may lead to poor bone health and increased risk for osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7045972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70459722020-03-05 Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers between Young Adult Male Smokers and Nonsmokers Al-Bashaireh, Ahmad M Alqudah, Ola Cureus Public Health Background This study aims to compare the differences in the means of bone formation and resorption markers between young adult male smokers and nonsmokers. Methods This study employed a cross-sectional, descriptive design. Thirty-five smokers and 38 nonsmokers were recruited. All participants completed self-reported questionnaires about demographics, physical activity, and smoking status. In addition, blood specimens were collected to determine serum levels of bone turnover markers. Results Regarding bone formation markers, the least square means (LSM) for osteoprotegerin (OPG) and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) were similar for smoking and nonsmoking groups. Regarding bone resorption markers, the LSM serum carboxyl-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CTXI) level was found to be significantly lower in smokers than nonsmokers [0.82 ± 0.83 vs. 1.30 ± 0.82 ng/mL, F (1, 66) = 5.73, p = 0.020]. The LSM for soluble-receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (sRANKL) [1.64 ± 0.60 vs. 1.69 ± 0.62 ng/mL, F (1,64) = 10.74, p = 0.002] and RANKL/OPG [2.62 ± 1.09 vs. 2.81 ± 1.10 ng/mL, F (1,65) = 5.88, p = 0.018] were different for smoking and nonsmoking groups. Exploration of the moderating influence of physical activity on smoking effects revealed significant effect for the interaction between smoking status and physical activity on sRANKL [F (2, 64) = 8.63, p = 0.001] and RANKL/OPG ratio [F (2, 65) = 5.49, p = 0.006]. Conclusion Our study provides evidence for the effect of smoking on bone resorption markers in young adult males. Such effects should be carefully considered side by side with other lifestyles that may lead to poor bone health and increased risk for osteoporosis. Cureus 2020-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7045972/ /pubmed/32140342 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6782 Text en Copyright © 2020, Al-Bashaireh et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Public Health
Al-Bashaireh, Ahmad M
Alqudah, Ola
Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers between Young Adult Male Smokers and Nonsmokers
title Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers between Young Adult Male Smokers and Nonsmokers
title_full Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers between Young Adult Male Smokers and Nonsmokers
title_fullStr Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers between Young Adult Male Smokers and Nonsmokers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers between Young Adult Male Smokers and Nonsmokers
title_short Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers between Young Adult Male Smokers and Nonsmokers
title_sort comparison of bone turnover markers between young adult male smokers and nonsmokers
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140342
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6782
work_keys_str_mv AT albashairehahmadm comparisonofboneturnovermarkersbetweenyoungadultmalesmokersandnonsmokers
AT alqudahola comparisonofboneturnovermarkersbetweenyoungadultmalesmokersandnonsmokers