Cargando…

Effectiveness and safety of different doses of pioglitazone in psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Pioglitazone may be beneficial in the treatment of psoriasis. However, based on the effectiveness and safety considerations, it has not been widely used. To fully evaluate the strength of evidence supporting psoriasis treatment with pioglitazone, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jing-Zhan, Ding, Yuan, Xiang, Fang, Yu, Shi-Rong, Zhang, De-Zhi, Guan, Meng-Meng, Kang, Xiao-Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31977550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000642
_version_ 1783501932226150400
author Zhang, Jing-Zhan
Ding, Yuan
Xiang, Fang
Yu, Shi-Rong
Zhang, De-Zhi
Guan, Meng-Meng
Kang, Xiao-Jing
author_facet Zhang, Jing-Zhan
Ding, Yuan
Xiang, Fang
Yu, Shi-Rong
Zhang, De-Zhi
Guan, Meng-Meng
Kang, Xiao-Jing
author_sort Zhang, Jing-Zhan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pioglitazone may be beneficial in the treatment of psoriasis. However, based on the effectiveness and safety considerations, it has not been widely used. To fully evaluate the strength of evidence supporting psoriasis treatment with pioglitazone, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing published studies. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched before February 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pioglitazone administration compared with placebo, administered to patients with psoriasis for at least 10 weeks, and published in English were included. Quality of the included RCTs was identified by the modified Jadad scale. The quality of evidence for each outcome was evaluated using the GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool online software. Primary outcomes were proportion of patients showing psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score improvement (>75%) and the mean percent change in PASI score from baseline to the end of treatment. Dichotomous data were analyzed using odds ratios (ORs) corresponding to the 95% confidence interval (CI), whereas continuous variables, expressed as mean and standard deviation, were analyzed using the mean differences (MD) with the 95% CI. RESULTS: Six RCTs were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed that pioglitazone reduced the PASI scores in patients with psoriasis compared with the control group when administered at 30 mg per day (P < 0.001, MD = –3.82, 95% CI = –5.70, –1.93) and at 15 mg per day (P = 0.04, MD = –3.53, 95% CI = –6.86, –0.20). The PASI-75 of the pioglitazone group was significantly higher than that of the control group at 30 mg per day (P < 0.001, OR = 8.30, 95% CI = 3.99, 17.27) and at 15 mg per day (P = 0.03, OR = 2.96, 95% CI = 1.08, 8.06). No statistically significant differences in total adverse events were observed between the groups. There were no significant differences in common adverse reactions such as weight gain and elevated liver enzymes between the two pioglitazone groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of pioglitazone in the current treatment of psoriasis is beneficial. The therapeutic effect of the daily 30 mg dose may be greater than that of the 15 mg dose per day with no significant change in the frequency of adverse reactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7046258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70462582020-03-10 Effectiveness and safety of different doses of pioglitazone in psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Zhang, Jing-Zhan Ding, Yuan Xiang, Fang Yu, Shi-Rong Zhang, De-Zhi Guan, Meng-Meng Kang, Xiao-Jing Chin Med J (Engl) Meta Analysis BACKGROUND: Pioglitazone may be beneficial in the treatment of psoriasis. However, based on the effectiveness and safety considerations, it has not been widely used. To fully evaluate the strength of evidence supporting psoriasis treatment with pioglitazone, we conducted a meta-analysis of existing published studies. METHODS: PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched before February 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pioglitazone administration compared with placebo, administered to patients with psoriasis for at least 10 weeks, and published in English were included. Quality of the included RCTs was identified by the modified Jadad scale. The quality of evidence for each outcome was evaluated using the GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool online software. Primary outcomes were proportion of patients showing psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score improvement (>75%) and the mean percent change in PASI score from baseline to the end of treatment. Dichotomous data were analyzed using odds ratios (ORs) corresponding to the 95% confidence interval (CI), whereas continuous variables, expressed as mean and standard deviation, were analyzed using the mean differences (MD) with the 95% CI. RESULTS: Six RCTs were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed that pioglitazone reduced the PASI scores in patients with psoriasis compared with the control group when administered at 30 mg per day (P < 0.001, MD = –3.82, 95% CI = –5.70, –1.93) and at 15 mg per day (P = 0.04, MD = –3.53, 95% CI = –6.86, –0.20). The PASI-75 of the pioglitazone group was significantly higher than that of the control group at 30 mg per day (P < 0.001, OR = 8.30, 95% CI = 3.99, 17.27) and at 15 mg per day (P = 0.03, OR = 2.96, 95% CI = 1.08, 8.06). No statistically significant differences in total adverse events were observed between the groups. There were no significant differences in common adverse reactions such as weight gain and elevated liver enzymes between the two pioglitazone groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of pioglitazone in the current treatment of psoriasis is beneficial. The therapeutic effect of the daily 30 mg dose may be greater than that of the 15 mg dose per day with no significant change in the frequency of adverse reactions. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-02-20 2020-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7046258/ /pubmed/31977550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000642 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Meta Analysis
Zhang, Jing-Zhan
Ding, Yuan
Xiang, Fang
Yu, Shi-Rong
Zhang, De-Zhi
Guan, Meng-Meng
Kang, Xiao-Jing
Effectiveness and safety of different doses of pioglitazone in psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Effectiveness and safety of different doses of pioglitazone in psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Effectiveness and safety of different doses of pioglitazone in psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of different doses of pioglitazone in psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of different doses of pioglitazone in psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Effectiveness and safety of different doses of pioglitazone in psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort effectiveness and safety of different doses of pioglitazone in psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Meta Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31977550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000642
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjingzhan effectivenessandsafetyofdifferentdosesofpioglitazoneinpsoriasisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dingyuan effectivenessandsafetyofdifferentdosesofpioglitazoneinpsoriasisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xiangfang effectivenessandsafetyofdifferentdosesofpioglitazoneinpsoriasisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yushirong effectivenessandsafetyofdifferentdosesofpioglitazoneinpsoriasisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangdezhi effectivenessandsafetyofdifferentdosesofpioglitazoneinpsoriasisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT guanmengmeng effectivenessandsafetyofdifferentdosesofpioglitazoneinpsoriasisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kangxiaojing effectivenessandsafetyofdifferentdosesofpioglitazoneinpsoriasisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials