Cargando…

Biomechanical comparison of plantar-to-dorsal and dorsal-to-plantar screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis

OBJECTIVE: To compare screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis. METHODS: Eight matched pairs of cadaver feet underwent subtalar joint arthrodesis with two 7.3mm cannulated screws. Randomization was used to assign screw orientation, such that one foot in each pair was assigned dorsal to plant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaudhari, Nileshkumar, Godoy-Santos, Alexandre Leme, Netto, Cesar de Cesar, Rodriguez, Ramon, Dun, Shouchen, He, Jun Kit, McKissack, Haley, Fleisig, Glenn S., Pires, Eduardo Araujo, Shah, Ashish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32159606
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5052
_version_ 1783501944960057344
author Chaudhari, Nileshkumar
Godoy-Santos, Alexandre Leme
Netto, Cesar de Cesar
Rodriguez, Ramon
Dun, Shouchen
He, Jun Kit
McKissack, Haley
Fleisig, Glenn S.
Pires, Eduardo Araujo
Shah, Ashish
author_facet Chaudhari, Nileshkumar
Godoy-Santos, Alexandre Leme
Netto, Cesar de Cesar
Rodriguez, Ramon
Dun, Shouchen
He, Jun Kit
McKissack, Haley
Fleisig, Glenn S.
Pires, Eduardo Araujo
Shah, Ashish
author_sort Chaudhari, Nileshkumar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis. METHODS: Eight matched pairs of cadaver feet underwent subtalar joint arthrodesis with two 7.3mm cannulated screws. Randomization was used to assign screw orientation, such that one foot in each pair was assigned dorsal to plantar screw orientation (DP Group), and the other foot, plantar to dorsal orientation (PD Group). Standard surgical technique with fluoroscopy was used for each approach. Following fixation, each specimen was loaded to failure with a Bionix (®) 858 MTS device, applying a downward axial force at a distance to create torque. Torque to failure was compared between DP and PD Groups using Student’s t test, with p=0.05 used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Statistical analysis demonstrated that the mean torque to failure slightly favored the DP Group (37.3Nm) to the PD Group (32.2Nm). However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.55). CONCLUSION: In subtalar arthrodesis, there is no significant difference in construct strength between dorsal-to-plantar and plantar-to-dorsal screw orientation. The approach chosen by the surgeon should be based on factors other than the biomechanical strength of the screw orientation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7046341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70463412020-03-10 Biomechanical comparison of plantar-to-dorsal and dorsal-to-plantar screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis Chaudhari, Nileshkumar Godoy-Santos, Alexandre Leme Netto, Cesar de Cesar Rodriguez, Ramon Dun, Shouchen He, Jun Kit McKissack, Haley Fleisig, Glenn S. Pires, Eduardo Araujo Shah, Ashish Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis. METHODS: Eight matched pairs of cadaver feet underwent subtalar joint arthrodesis with two 7.3mm cannulated screws. Randomization was used to assign screw orientation, such that one foot in each pair was assigned dorsal to plantar screw orientation (DP Group), and the other foot, plantar to dorsal orientation (PD Group). Standard surgical technique with fluoroscopy was used for each approach. Following fixation, each specimen was loaded to failure with a Bionix (®) 858 MTS device, applying a downward axial force at a distance to create torque. Torque to failure was compared between DP and PD Groups using Student’s t test, with p=0.05 used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Statistical analysis demonstrated that the mean torque to failure slightly favored the DP Group (37.3Nm) to the PD Group (32.2Nm). However, the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p=0.55). CONCLUSION: In subtalar arthrodesis, there is no significant difference in construct strength between dorsal-to-plantar and plantar-to-dorsal screw orientation. The approach chosen by the surgeon should be based on factors other than the biomechanical strength of the screw orientation. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7046341/ /pubmed/32159606 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5052 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chaudhari, Nileshkumar
Godoy-Santos, Alexandre Leme
Netto, Cesar de Cesar
Rodriguez, Ramon
Dun, Shouchen
He, Jun Kit
McKissack, Haley
Fleisig, Glenn S.
Pires, Eduardo Araujo
Shah, Ashish
Biomechanical comparison of plantar-to-dorsal and dorsal-to-plantar screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis
title Biomechanical comparison of plantar-to-dorsal and dorsal-to-plantar screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis
title_full Biomechanical comparison of plantar-to-dorsal and dorsal-to-plantar screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison of plantar-to-dorsal and dorsal-to-plantar screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison of plantar-to-dorsal and dorsal-to-plantar screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis
title_short Biomechanical comparison of plantar-to-dorsal and dorsal-to-plantar screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis
title_sort biomechanical comparison of plantar-to-dorsal and dorsal-to-plantar screw fixation strength for subtalar arthrodesis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32159606
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5052
work_keys_str_mv AT chaudharinileshkumar biomechanicalcomparisonofplantartodorsalanddorsaltoplantarscrewfixationstrengthforsubtalararthrodesis
AT godoysantosalexandreleme biomechanicalcomparisonofplantartodorsalanddorsaltoplantarscrewfixationstrengthforsubtalararthrodesis
AT nettocesardecesar biomechanicalcomparisonofplantartodorsalanddorsaltoplantarscrewfixationstrengthforsubtalararthrodesis
AT rodriguezramon biomechanicalcomparisonofplantartodorsalanddorsaltoplantarscrewfixationstrengthforsubtalararthrodesis
AT dunshouchen biomechanicalcomparisonofplantartodorsalanddorsaltoplantarscrewfixationstrengthforsubtalararthrodesis
AT hejunkit biomechanicalcomparisonofplantartodorsalanddorsaltoplantarscrewfixationstrengthforsubtalararthrodesis
AT mckissackhaley biomechanicalcomparisonofplantartodorsalanddorsaltoplantarscrewfixationstrengthforsubtalararthrodesis
AT fleisigglenns biomechanicalcomparisonofplantartodorsalanddorsaltoplantarscrewfixationstrengthforsubtalararthrodesis
AT pireseduardoaraujo biomechanicalcomparisonofplantartodorsalanddorsaltoplantarscrewfixationstrengthforsubtalararthrodesis
AT shahashish biomechanicalcomparisonofplantartodorsalanddorsaltoplantarscrewfixationstrengthforsubtalararthrodesis