Cargando…

Antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review

The belief that, for the individual patient, the benefit of prompt and continued use of antimicrobials outweighs any potential harm is a significant barrier to improved stewardship of these vital agents. Antimicrobial stewardship may be perceived as utilitarian rationing, seeking to preserve the ava...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arulkumaran, Nishkantha, Routledge, Matthew, Schlebusch, Sanmarié, Lipman, Jeffrey, Conway Morris, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05929-3
_version_ 1783501955411214336
author Arulkumaran, Nishkantha
Routledge, Matthew
Schlebusch, Sanmarié
Lipman, Jeffrey
Conway Morris, Andrew
author_facet Arulkumaran, Nishkantha
Routledge, Matthew
Schlebusch, Sanmarié
Lipman, Jeffrey
Conway Morris, Andrew
author_sort Arulkumaran, Nishkantha
collection PubMed
description The belief that, for the individual patient, the benefit of prompt and continued use of antimicrobials outweighs any potential harm is a significant barrier to improved stewardship of these vital agents. Antimicrobial stewardship may be perceived as utilitarian rationing, seeking to preserve the availability of effective antimicrobials by limiting the development of resistance in a manner which could conflict with the immediate treatment of the patient in need. This view does not account for the growing evidence of antimicrobial-associated harm to individual patients. This review sets out the evidence for antimicrobial-associated harm and how this should be balanced with the need for prompt and appropriate therapy in infection. It describes the mechanisms by which antimicrobials may harm patients including: mitochondrial toxicity; immune cell toxicity; adverse drug reactions; selection of resistant organisms within a given patient; and disruption of the microbiome. Finally, the article indicates how the harms of antimicrobials may be mitigated and identifies areas for research and development in this field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7046486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70464862020-05-15 Antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review Arulkumaran, Nishkantha Routledge, Matthew Schlebusch, Sanmarié Lipman, Jeffrey Conway Morris, Andrew Intensive Care Med Narrative Review The belief that, for the individual patient, the benefit of prompt and continued use of antimicrobials outweighs any potential harm is a significant barrier to improved stewardship of these vital agents. Antimicrobial stewardship may be perceived as utilitarian rationing, seeking to preserve the availability of effective antimicrobials by limiting the development of resistance in a manner which could conflict with the immediate treatment of the patient in need. This view does not account for the growing evidence of antimicrobial-associated harm to individual patients. This review sets out the evidence for antimicrobial-associated harm and how this should be balanced with the need for prompt and appropriate therapy in infection. It describes the mechanisms by which antimicrobials may harm patients including: mitochondrial toxicity; immune cell toxicity; adverse drug reactions; selection of resistant organisms within a given patient; and disruption of the microbiome. Finally, the article indicates how the harms of antimicrobials may be mitigated and identifies areas for research and development in this field. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-01-29 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7046486/ /pubmed/31996961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05929-3 Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Narrative Review
Arulkumaran, Nishkantha
Routledge, Matthew
Schlebusch, Sanmarié
Lipman, Jeffrey
Conway Morris, Andrew
Antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review
title Antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review
title_full Antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review
title_fullStr Antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review
title_short Antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review
title_sort antimicrobial-associated harm in critical care: a narrative review
topic Narrative Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05929-3
work_keys_str_mv AT arulkumarannishkantha antimicrobialassociatedharmincriticalcareanarrativereview
AT routledgematthew antimicrobialassociatedharmincriticalcareanarrativereview
AT schlebuschsanmarie antimicrobialassociatedharmincriticalcareanarrativereview
AT lipmanjeffrey antimicrobialassociatedharmincriticalcareanarrativereview
AT conwaymorrisandrew antimicrobialassociatedharmincriticalcareanarrativereview