Cargando…
Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017
This literature review examines infectious wildlife disease research in Austria. We analyzed 226 research papers, published between 1980 and 2017. We determined that wildlife disease papers increased significantly from 0.8 ± 0.8 publications per year in the first decade (1980–1989) when compared to...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32154271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00003 |
_version_ | 1783501986028584960 |
---|---|
author | Trimmel, Nina Eva Walzer, Chris |
author_facet | Trimmel, Nina Eva Walzer, Chris |
author_sort | Trimmel, Nina Eva |
collection | PubMed |
description | This literature review examines infectious wildlife disease research in Austria. We analyzed 226 research papers, published between 1980 and 2017. We determined that wildlife disease papers increased significantly from 0.8 ± 0.8 publications per year in the first decade (1980–1989) when compared to 2008–2017 with an average of 12.9 ± 4.1 publications per year. We illustrate information about the most investigated diseases and highlight the lack of research into certain wildlife pathogens. A special emphasis was given to diseases with zoonotic potential. The review showed that research focused on a few select species like the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), red deer (Cervus elaphus), and wild boar (Sus scrofa), all game species. Moreover, diseases affecting livestock and human health were seen more often. The review also found that only a low number of publications actually stated disease prevalence and confidence interval data. The reported diseases identified were classified according to their notifiable status and the distribution at the wildlife–human and wildlife–livestock interface. Furthermore, we try to argue why research into some diseases is prioritized, and why other diseases are underrepresented in current Austrian research. While spatiotemporal indicators could not be assessed due to the variability in methodologies and objectives of various studies, the information provided by this review offers the first comprehensive evaluation of the status of infectious wildlife disease research in Austria. Therefore, this study could assist investigators to identify further areas of priorities for research and conservation efforts and for wildlife management professionals to inform policy and funding strategies. With this review, we want to encourage research in the field of wildlife diseases in Austria to enhance current knowledge in the prevention of further loss in biodiversity and to find new measures to promote “One Health” on a global scale. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7046627 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70466272020-03-09 Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017 Trimmel, Nina Eva Walzer, Chris Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science This literature review examines infectious wildlife disease research in Austria. We analyzed 226 research papers, published between 1980 and 2017. We determined that wildlife disease papers increased significantly from 0.8 ± 0.8 publications per year in the first decade (1980–1989) when compared to 2008–2017 with an average of 12.9 ± 4.1 publications per year. We illustrate information about the most investigated diseases and highlight the lack of research into certain wildlife pathogens. A special emphasis was given to diseases with zoonotic potential. The review showed that research focused on a few select species like the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), red deer (Cervus elaphus), and wild boar (Sus scrofa), all game species. Moreover, diseases affecting livestock and human health were seen more often. The review also found that only a low number of publications actually stated disease prevalence and confidence interval data. The reported diseases identified were classified according to their notifiable status and the distribution at the wildlife–human and wildlife–livestock interface. Furthermore, we try to argue why research into some diseases is prioritized, and why other diseases are underrepresented in current Austrian research. While spatiotemporal indicators could not be assessed due to the variability in methodologies and objectives of various studies, the information provided by this review offers the first comprehensive evaluation of the status of infectious wildlife disease research in Austria. Therefore, this study could assist investigators to identify further areas of priorities for research and conservation efforts and for wildlife management professionals to inform policy and funding strategies. With this review, we want to encourage research in the field of wildlife diseases in Austria to enhance current knowledge in the prevention of further loss in biodiversity and to find new measures to promote “One Health” on a global scale. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7046627/ /pubmed/32154271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00003 Text en Copyright © 2020 Trimmel and Walzer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Science Trimmel, Nina Eva Walzer, Chris Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017 |
title | Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017 |
title_full | Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017 |
title_fullStr | Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017 |
title_full_unstemmed | Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017 |
title_short | Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017 |
title_sort | infectious wildlife diseases in austria—a literature review from 1980 until 2017 |
topic | Veterinary Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32154271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trimmelninaeva infectiouswildlifediseasesinaustriaaliteraturereviewfrom1980until2017 AT walzerchris infectiouswildlifediseasesinaustriaaliteraturereviewfrom1980until2017 |