Cargando…

Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017

This literature review examines infectious wildlife disease research in Austria. We analyzed 226 research papers, published between 1980 and 2017. We determined that wildlife disease papers increased significantly from 0.8 ± 0.8 publications per year in the first decade (1980–1989) when compared to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trimmel, Nina Eva, Walzer, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32154271
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00003
_version_ 1783501986028584960
author Trimmel, Nina Eva
Walzer, Chris
author_facet Trimmel, Nina Eva
Walzer, Chris
author_sort Trimmel, Nina Eva
collection PubMed
description This literature review examines infectious wildlife disease research in Austria. We analyzed 226 research papers, published between 1980 and 2017. We determined that wildlife disease papers increased significantly from 0.8 ± 0.8 publications per year in the first decade (1980–1989) when compared to 2008–2017 with an average of 12.9 ± 4.1 publications per year. We illustrate information about the most investigated diseases and highlight the lack of research into certain wildlife pathogens. A special emphasis was given to diseases with zoonotic potential. The review showed that research focused on a few select species like the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), red deer (Cervus elaphus), and wild boar (Sus scrofa), all game species. Moreover, diseases affecting livestock and human health were seen more often. The review also found that only a low number of publications actually stated disease prevalence and confidence interval data. The reported diseases identified were classified according to their notifiable status and the distribution at the wildlife–human and wildlife–livestock interface. Furthermore, we try to argue why research into some diseases is prioritized, and why other diseases are underrepresented in current Austrian research. While spatiotemporal indicators could not be assessed due to the variability in methodologies and objectives of various studies, the information provided by this review offers the first comprehensive evaluation of the status of infectious wildlife disease research in Austria. Therefore, this study could assist investigators to identify further areas of priorities for research and conservation efforts and for wildlife management professionals to inform policy and funding strategies. With this review, we want to encourage research in the field of wildlife diseases in Austria to enhance current knowledge in the prevention of further loss in biodiversity and to find new measures to promote “One Health” on a global scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7046627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70466272020-03-09 Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017 Trimmel, Nina Eva Walzer, Chris Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science This literature review examines infectious wildlife disease research in Austria. We analyzed 226 research papers, published between 1980 and 2017. We determined that wildlife disease papers increased significantly from 0.8 ± 0.8 publications per year in the first decade (1980–1989) when compared to 2008–2017 with an average of 12.9 ± 4.1 publications per year. We illustrate information about the most investigated diseases and highlight the lack of research into certain wildlife pathogens. A special emphasis was given to diseases with zoonotic potential. The review showed that research focused on a few select species like the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), red deer (Cervus elaphus), and wild boar (Sus scrofa), all game species. Moreover, diseases affecting livestock and human health were seen more often. The review also found that only a low number of publications actually stated disease prevalence and confidence interval data. The reported diseases identified were classified according to their notifiable status and the distribution at the wildlife–human and wildlife–livestock interface. Furthermore, we try to argue why research into some diseases is prioritized, and why other diseases are underrepresented in current Austrian research. While spatiotemporal indicators could not be assessed due to the variability in methodologies and objectives of various studies, the information provided by this review offers the first comprehensive evaluation of the status of infectious wildlife disease research in Austria. Therefore, this study could assist investigators to identify further areas of priorities for research and conservation efforts and for wildlife management professionals to inform policy and funding strategies. With this review, we want to encourage research in the field of wildlife diseases in Austria to enhance current knowledge in the prevention of further loss in biodiversity and to find new measures to promote “One Health” on a global scale. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7046627/ /pubmed/32154271 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00003 Text en Copyright © 2020 Trimmel and Walzer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Trimmel, Nina Eva
Walzer, Chris
Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017
title Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017
title_full Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017
title_fullStr Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017
title_full_unstemmed Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017
title_short Infectious Wildlife Diseases in Austria—A Literature Review From 1980 Until 2017
title_sort infectious wildlife diseases in austria—a literature review from 1980 until 2017
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32154271
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00003
work_keys_str_mv AT trimmelninaeva infectiouswildlifediseasesinaustriaaliteraturereviewfrom1980until2017
AT walzerchris infectiouswildlifediseasesinaustriaaliteraturereviewfrom1980until2017