Cargando…

Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities

BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a nonmalignant neoplasm composed of multinucleated giant and mononuclear stromal cells. This study aimed to compare imaging findings of GCT pre- and post-denosumab treatment, including lesion size, percentage of signal intensity/density change, and time of initi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alothman, Maram, Althobaity, Waleed, Asiri, Yasser, Alreshoodi, Saleh, Alismail, Khalid, Alshaalan, Meshal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32108273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00845-y
_version_ 1783502036860403712
author Alothman, Maram
Althobaity, Waleed
Asiri, Yasser
Alreshoodi, Saleh
Alismail, Khalid
Alshaalan, Meshal
author_facet Alothman, Maram
Althobaity, Waleed
Asiri, Yasser
Alreshoodi, Saleh
Alismail, Khalid
Alshaalan, Meshal
author_sort Alothman, Maram
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a nonmalignant neoplasm composed of multinucleated giant and mononuclear stromal cells. This study aimed to compare imaging findings of GCT pre- and post-denosumab treatment, including lesion size, percentage of signal intensity/density change, and time of initial objective tumor response. This will have a great impact on selection of most appropriate imaging technique to accurately measure therapy response and its related complications, which would influence the physicians to tailor the treatment regimen to suit each patient. RESULTS: As per inverse Choi density/size (ICDS), 16 patients (84.2%) had an objective tumor response and 15 (78.9%) had an increase in density or decrease in signal intensity, and the mean of signal intensity decrease in the treated lesions was 32.4% (95% CI, 18–46.7). Only seven patients (36.8%) had tumors demonstrating ≥ 10% decrease in size, all of which showed a positive change in signal/density except for one. Moreover, 17 patients (89.4%) showed a clear demarcation/low signal intensity margin surrounding ≥ two third of the lesion periphery. The median time to first objective tumor response was approximately 23 weeks. CONCLUSION: Based on the ICDS criteria, most patients with giant cell tumor of bone show objective tumor response to denosumab. Modification of ICDS to include marginal sclerosis or clear demarcation of the lesions might be considered as a separate response criterion to accurately assess the treatment response in patients with GCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7046877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70468772020-03-13 Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities Alothman, Maram Althobaity, Waleed Asiri, Yasser Alreshoodi, Saleh Alismail, Khalid Alshaalan, Meshal Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a nonmalignant neoplasm composed of multinucleated giant and mononuclear stromal cells. This study aimed to compare imaging findings of GCT pre- and post-denosumab treatment, including lesion size, percentage of signal intensity/density change, and time of initial objective tumor response. This will have a great impact on selection of most appropriate imaging technique to accurately measure therapy response and its related complications, which would influence the physicians to tailor the treatment regimen to suit each patient. RESULTS: As per inverse Choi density/size (ICDS), 16 patients (84.2%) had an objective tumor response and 15 (78.9%) had an increase in density or decrease in signal intensity, and the mean of signal intensity decrease in the treated lesions was 32.4% (95% CI, 18–46.7). Only seven patients (36.8%) had tumors demonstrating ≥ 10% decrease in size, all of which showed a positive change in signal/density except for one. Moreover, 17 patients (89.4%) showed a clear demarcation/low signal intensity margin surrounding ≥ two third of the lesion periphery. The median time to first objective tumor response was approximately 23 weeks. CONCLUSION: Based on the ICDS criteria, most patients with giant cell tumor of bone show objective tumor response to denosumab. Modification of ICDS to include marginal sclerosis or clear demarcation of the lesions might be considered as a separate response criterion to accurately assess the treatment response in patients with GCT. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7046877/ /pubmed/32108273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00845-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Alothman, Maram
Althobaity, Waleed
Asiri, Yasser
Alreshoodi, Saleh
Alismail, Khalid
Alshaalan, Meshal
Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities
title Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities
title_full Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities
title_fullStr Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities
title_full_unstemmed Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities
title_short Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities
title_sort giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32108273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00845-y
work_keys_str_mv AT alothmanmaram giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities
AT althobaitywaleed giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities
AT asiriyasser giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities
AT alreshoodisaleh giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities
AT alismailkhalid giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities
AT alshaalanmeshal giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities