Cargando…
Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities
BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a nonmalignant neoplasm composed of multinucleated giant and mononuclear stromal cells. This study aimed to compare imaging findings of GCT pre- and post-denosumab treatment, including lesion size, percentage of signal intensity/density change, and time of initi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32108273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00845-y |
_version_ | 1783502036860403712 |
---|---|
author | Alothman, Maram Althobaity, Waleed Asiri, Yasser Alreshoodi, Saleh Alismail, Khalid Alshaalan, Meshal |
author_facet | Alothman, Maram Althobaity, Waleed Asiri, Yasser Alreshoodi, Saleh Alismail, Khalid Alshaalan, Meshal |
author_sort | Alothman, Maram |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a nonmalignant neoplasm composed of multinucleated giant and mononuclear stromal cells. This study aimed to compare imaging findings of GCT pre- and post-denosumab treatment, including lesion size, percentage of signal intensity/density change, and time of initial objective tumor response. This will have a great impact on selection of most appropriate imaging technique to accurately measure therapy response and its related complications, which would influence the physicians to tailor the treatment regimen to suit each patient. RESULTS: As per inverse Choi density/size (ICDS), 16 patients (84.2%) had an objective tumor response and 15 (78.9%) had an increase in density or decrease in signal intensity, and the mean of signal intensity decrease in the treated lesions was 32.4% (95% CI, 18–46.7). Only seven patients (36.8%) had tumors demonstrating ≥ 10% decrease in size, all of which showed a positive change in signal/density except for one. Moreover, 17 patients (89.4%) showed a clear demarcation/low signal intensity margin surrounding ≥ two third of the lesion periphery. The median time to first objective tumor response was approximately 23 weeks. CONCLUSION: Based on the ICDS criteria, most patients with giant cell tumor of bone show objective tumor response to denosumab. Modification of ICDS to include marginal sclerosis or clear demarcation of the lesions might be considered as a separate response criterion to accurately assess the treatment response in patients with GCT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7046877 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70468772020-03-13 Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities Alothman, Maram Althobaity, Waleed Asiri, Yasser Alreshoodi, Saleh Alismail, Khalid Alshaalan, Meshal Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a nonmalignant neoplasm composed of multinucleated giant and mononuclear stromal cells. This study aimed to compare imaging findings of GCT pre- and post-denosumab treatment, including lesion size, percentage of signal intensity/density change, and time of initial objective tumor response. This will have a great impact on selection of most appropriate imaging technique to accurately measure therapy response and its related complications, which would influence the physicians to tailor the treatment regimen to suit each patient. RESULTS: As per inverse Choi density/size (ICDS), 16 patients (84.2%) had an objective tumor response and 15 (78.9%) had an increase in density or decrease in signal intensity, and the mean of signal intensity decrease in the treated lesions was 32.4% (95% CI, 18–46.7). Only seven patients (36.8%) had tumors demonstrating ≥ 10% decrease in size, all of which showed a positive change in signal/density except for one. Moreover, 17 patients (89.4%) showed a clear demarcation/low signal intensity margin surrounding ≥ two third of the lesion periphery. The median time to first objective tumor response was approximately 23 weeks. CONCLUSION: Based on the ICDS criteria, most patients with giant cell tumor of bone show objective tumor response to denosumab. Modification of ICDS to include marginal sclerosis or clear demarcation of the lesions might be considered as a separate response criterion to accurately assess the treatment response in patients with GCT. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7046877/ /pubmed/32108273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00845-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Alothman, Maram Althobaity, Waleed Asiri, Yasser Alreshoodi, Saleh Alismail, Khalid Alshaalan, Meshal Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities |
title | Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities |
title_full | Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities |
title_fullStr | Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities |
title_full_unstemmed | Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities |
title_short | Giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities |
title_sort | giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab treatment: assessment of tumor response using various imaging modalities |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7046877/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32108273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00845-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alothmanmaram giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities AT althobaitywaleed giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities AT asiriyasser giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities AT alreshoodisaleh giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities AT alismailkhalid giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities AT alshaalanmeshal giantcelltumorofbonefollowingdenosumabtreatmentassessmentoftumorresponseusingvariousimagingmodalities |