Cargando…
Procreative Non-Maleficence: A South African Human Rights Perspective on Heritable Human Genome Editing
If the safety and efficacy issues relating to heritable genome editing can be resolved, how should liberal democratic societies regulate the use of this technology by prospective parents who wish to effect edits to the genomes of their prospective children? We suggest that recent developments in Sou...
Autores principales: | Thaldar, Donrich, Shozi, Bonginkosi |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7047083/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32091250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2019.0036 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A virtual deliberative public engagement study on heritable genome editing among South Africans: Study protocol
por: Thaldar, Donrich, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Future of global regulation of human genome editing: a South African perspective on the WHO Draft Governance Framework on Human Genome Editing
por: Shozi, Bonginkosi, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
A deliberative public engagement study on heritable human genome editing among South Africans: Study results
por: Thaldar, Donrich, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Is benefit sharing with research participants lawful in South Africa? An unexplored question in the governance of genomics research
por: Thaldar, Donrich, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Does human germline genome editing violate human dignity? An African perspective
por: Shozi, Bonginkosi
Publicado: (2021)